Library

Notes: Summary The otolith contribution and otolith-visual interaction in eye and head stabilization were investigated in alert cats submitted to sinusoidal linear accelerations in three defined directions of space: up-down (Z motion), left-right (Y motion), and forward-back (X motion). Otolith stimulation alone was performed in total darkness with stimulus frequency varying from 0.05 to 1.39 Hz at a constant half peak-to-peak amplitude of 0.145 m (corresponding acceleration range 0.0014–1.13 g) Optokinetic stimuli were provided by sinusoidally moving a pseudorandom visual pattern in the Z and Y directions, using a similar half peak-to-peak amplitude (0.145 m, i.e., 16.1°) in the 0.025–1.39 Hz frequency domain (corresponding velocity range 2.5°–141°/s). Congruent otolith-visual interaction (costimulation, CS) was produced by moving the cat in front of the earth-stationary visual pattern, while conflicting interaction was obtained by suppressing all visual motion cues during linear motion (visual stabilization method, VS, with cat and visual pattern moving together, in phase). Electromyographic (EMG) activity of antagonist neck extensor (splenius capitis) and flexor (longus capitis) muscles as well as horizontal and vertical eye movements (electrooculography, EOG) were recorded in these different experimental conditions. Results showed that otolith-neck (ONR) and otolith-ocular (OOR) responses were produced during pure otolith stimulation with relatively weak stimuli (0.036 g) in all directions tested. Both EMG and EOG response gain slightly increased, while response phase lead decreased (with respect to stimulus velocity) as stimulus frequency increased in the range 0.25–1.39 Hz. Otolith contribution to compensatory eye and neck responses increased with stimulus frequency, leading to EMG and EOG responses, which oppose the imposed displacement more and more. But the otolith system alone remained unable to produce perfect compensatory responses, even at the highest frequency tested. In contrast, optokinetic stimuli in the Z and Y directions evoked consistent and compensatory eye movement responses (OKR) in a lower frequency range (0.025–0.25 Hz). Increasing stimulus frequency induced strong gain reduction and phase lag. Oculo-neck coupling or eye-head synergy was found during optokinetic stimulation in the Z and Y directions. It was characterized by bilateral activation of neck extensors and flexors during upward and downward eye movements, respectively, and by ipsilateral activation of neck muscles during horizontal eye movements. These visually-induced neck responses seemed related to eye velocity signals. Dynamic properties of neck and eye responses were significantly improved when both inputs were combined (CS). Near perfect compensatory eye movement and neck muscle responses closely related to stimulus velocity were observed over all frequencies tested, in the three directions defined. The present study indicates that eye-head coordination processes during linear motion are mainly dependent on the visual system at low frequencies (below 0.25 Hz), with close functional coupling of OKR and eye-head synergy. The otolith system basically works at higher stimulus frequencies and triggers Synergist OOR and ONR. However, both sensorimotor subsystems combine their dynamic properties to provide better eyehead coordination in an extended frequency range and, as evidenced under VS condition, visual and otolith inputs also contribute to eye and neck responses at high and low frequency, respectively. These general laws on functional coupling of the eye and head stabilizing reflexes during linear motion are valid in the three directions tested, even though the relative weight of visual and otolith inputs may vary according to motion direction and/or kinematics.

Notes: Summary Extracellular activity from vestibular nuclei neurons and vertical eye movements were recorded in the alert cat during sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation in the vertical plane at frequencies varying from 0.0125 Hz to 0.75 Hz. Among a population of 96 vestibular units located in and around Deiters' nucleus, 73 neurons (76%) displayed a firing rate modulation which followed the input at the standard parameters of visual stimulation (0.05 Hz; 10.1 deg/s or 9.1 cm/s peak to peak velocity). Two different patterns of modulation were found. In 42 cells (57%) an increase in the firing rate was observed during motion of the visual scene in the downward direction, while 31 neurons (43%) showed the opposite behavior, with an enhanced firing rate during upward movement. The phase of the neuronal responses was close (± 45°) to the velocity peaks (+90°: downward and -90°: upward) of visual scene motion for 65 among the 73 neurons. Mean values of phase was-6.1 ± 19.5° (SD) and -3.2 ± 15.5° (SD) with respect to the +90° and -90° velocity peaks, respectively. In the frequency range 0.0125–0.75 Hz, the phase of the neuronal responses remained almost stable, with only a slight lag which reaches -22° at the 0.25 Hz visual stimulation. The firing rate modulation was found to be predominant at low frequencies (0.0125 Hz–0.25 Hz), with three distinct peaks of modulation occurring either at 0.025 Hz, 0.10 Hz or 0.25 Hz, depending on the recorded cells. Above 0.5 Hz, the cell modulation was very poorly developed or even absent. A gain attenuation was observed in all units, which was more important in cells showing a peak of modulation at 0.025 Hz as compared with the others (-20.7 dB vs -9.6 dB, respectively, in the 0.025 Hz–0.25 Hz decade). The gain of the optokinetic reflex (OKR) progressively decreased from mean values of 0.78 ± 0.15 to 0.05 ± 0.06 in the 0.025 Hz–0.5 Hz frequency range. A close correlation was observed between the OKR slow phase velocity and the modulation of the neuronal responses in the two cell populations with maximal modulations at 0.10 Hz or 0.25 Hz. No correlations were noticed in the third population characterized by a peak of modulation at 0.025 Hz. In all units, the phase of eye movement velocity and of neuronal responses were both related to the velocity of the visual surround motion. These correlations were also found when varying the amplitude of the visual stimulation at a fixed frequency. Saturation was observed in the unit responses at velocities above 68.5°/s. When considering both the gain attenuation in the frequency range and the correlation between firing rate modulation and OKR slow phase velocity, two rather different cell populations can be distinguished: one with neurons peaking at 0.025 Hz (strong gain attenuation; no correlation with OKR velocity) and one with neurons peaking at 0.10 Hz or 0.25 Hz (slight gain attenuation; correlation with OKR velocity). This study points to the influence of visual motion cues on vestibular nuclei unit activity in the low-frequency range. A velocity coding of visual — surround motion in the vertical plane is performed by vestibular neurons. Our results in the alert cat suggest that both retinal (retinal slip) and extraretinal (proprioceptive afferences from eye muscles, efference copy) inputs can be involved in this visually induced modulation of vestibular nuclei neurons.

Notes: Summary In the present study we have investigated in the awake cat the response dynamics of vestibular nuclei neurons to visual or/and otolith stimulation elicited by vertical linear motion. Of the 53 units tested during sinusoidal motion at 0.05 Hz (9.1 cm/ s), 1 (1.9%) was responsive to the otolith input only, 13 (24.5%) were influenced by the visual input only and 23 (43.4%) responded to both modalities. Neurons were excited either during upward or downward animal or visual surround movement. Most units displayed a firing rate modulation very close to motion velocity. All the neurons receiving convergent visual and otolith inputs (0.05 Hz, 9.1 cm/s) exhibited synergistic patterns of response. Motion velocity coding was improved in terms of inputoutput phase relationship and response sensitivity when visual and otolith signals were combined. Depending on the units, visual-otolith interactions in single neurons could follow a linear or a nonlinear mode of summation. The dynamic characteristics of visual-otolith interactions were examined in the 0.05 Hz–0.50 Hz frequency bandwidth. Visual signals seemed to predominate over otolith signals at low stimulus frequencies (up to 0.25 Hz), while the contrary was found in the higher frequency range of movement (above 0.25 Hz). The effects of visual stabilization (VS: suppression of visual motion cues) was observed in a small sample of units. As a rule, VS induced a reduction in the amplitude of unit response as compared to visual + otolith stimulation, the lower the motion frequency, the more pronounced the attenuation. VS also decreased the amplitude of the otolith-dependent component of response. The possible modes of visual-vestibular interactions in single cells are discussed. The present study supports the hypothesis that visual and vestibular motion cues are weighted according to their internal relevance.

Notes: Abstract  The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in neck muscle and eye movement responses during the early stages of vestibular compensation (first 3 weeks after unilateral vestibular neurectomy, UVN). Electromyographic (EMG) activity from antagonist neck extensor (splenius capitis) and flexor (longus capitis) muscles and eye movements were recorded during sinusoidal visual and/or otolith vertical linear stimulations in the 0.05–1 Hz frequency range (corresponding acceleration range 0.003–1.16 g) in the head-fixed alert cat. Preoperative EMG activity from the splenius and longus capitis muscles showed a pattern of alternate activation of the antagonist neck muscles in all the cats. After UVN, two motor strategies were observed. For three of the seven cats, the temporal activation of the individual neck muscles was the same as that recorded before UVN. For the other four cats, UVN resulted in a pattern of coactivation of the flexor and extensor neck muscles because of a phase change of the splenius capitis. In both subgroups, the response patterns of the antagonist neck muscles were consistent for each cat independently of the experimental conditions, throughout the 3 weeks of testing. Cats displaying alternate activation of antagonist neck muscles showed an enhanced gain of the visually induced neck responses, particularly in the high range of stimulus frequency, and a gain decrease in the otolith-induced neck responses at the lowest frequency (0.25 Hz) only. By contrast, for cats with neck muscle coactivation, the gain of the visually induced neck responses was basically unaffected relative to preoperative values, whereas otolith-induced neck responses were considerably decreased in the whole range of stimulation. As concerns oculomotor responses, results in the two subgroups of cats were similar. The optokinetic responses were not affected by the vestibular lesion. On the contrary, otolith-induced eye responses showed a gain reduction and a phase lead. Deficits and short-term changes after UVN of otolith- and semicircular canal-evoked collic and ocular responses are compared.

Notes: Summary The aim of the present study was to investigate some aspects of the central processing of otolith information during linear motion. For this purpose, the response characteristics of 69 vestibular nuclei units to sinusoidal otolith stimulation in the vertical Z axis were analysed in the alert cat. Among this population of neurons which responded to a 0.05 Hz, 290 mm translation, 47 units (70%) displayed a firing rate modulation which followed the input frequency (H1 units). The majority of these neurons exhibited an increase in discharge rate during upward displacement, with a response phase close to the motion velocity or slightly leading downward acceleration. The acceleration related units were divided into two groups according to whether they showed clear increases or only a slight change in discharge rate when the stimulus frequency was increased. The former group was characterized by an average −16.3 dB drop in gain (from 43.9±1.8 dB, S.D. to 27.6±7 dB, S.D.) within the 0.05 Hz–0.5 Hz frequency range, while the latter group displayed an average −31.2 dB gain attenuation (from 45.1±1.1 dB, S.D. to 13.9±0 dB) within the same decade. In contrast to differences in response gain, all the units tested exhibited a relatively stable phase lead of about 20° with respect to downward peak acceleration. Conversely, units whose response was close to motion velocity in the lower frequency range (0.05 Hz–0.10 Hz) displayed a strong phase lead of about 100° when the stimulus frequency was increased (up to 0.50 Hz). These neurons were thus characterized by an acceleration related response in the higher frequency range. At the same time, an average −24.8 dB gain attenuation (from 47.7±3.4 dB to 22.9±3.7 dB) was found in the 0.05 Hz–0.5 Hz decade. The remaining 22 neurons (30%) were called H2 units since they displayed a response waveform double that of the input frequency, a response already described during sinusoidal rotation. Unit discharge reached a peak approximately in phase with maximum upward and downward velocity. Asymmetrical change in unit firing rate about the resting discharge level and different dynamic behavior of the upward and downward response components were usually found. These response characteristics suggest that the H2 patterns are centrally constructed and could result from convergence of otolith afferents having opposite polarization vectors. Other evidence suggests that these units which behave like motion-detectors can exert an influence on the neck musculature. Our results corroborate, at least in part, the findings of previous studies on the dynamic responses properties of otolith-dependent central neurons during roll tilt, or pure linear acceleration in the horizontal plane.