Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Keywords: Anthropometric parameters ; BUA ; SOS ; Ultrasound
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Few data have been published concerning the influence of height, weight and body mass index (BMI) on broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and Lunar “stiffness” index, and always in small population samples. The first aim of the present cross-sectional study was to determine whether anthropometric factors have a significant influence on ultrasound measurements. The second objective was to establish whether these parameters have real effect on bone or whether their infuence is due only to measurement errors. We measured, in 271 healthy French women (mean age 77±11 years; range 31–97 years), the following parameters: age, height, weight, lean and fat body mass, heel width, foot length, knee height and height of the external malleolus (HEM). Simple linear regression analyses between ultrasound and anthropometric parameters were performed. Age, height and heel width were significant predictors of SOS; age, height, weight, foot length, heel width, HEM, fat mass and lean mass were significant predictors of BUA; age, height, weight, heel width, HEM, fat mass and lean mass were significant predictors of stiffness. In the multiple regression analysis, once the analysis had been adjusted for age, only heel width was a significant predictor for SOS (p=0.0007), weight for BUA (p=0.0001), and weight (p=0.0001) and heel width (p=0.004) for the stiffness index. Besides their statistical meaning, the regression coefficients have a more clinically relevant interpretation which is developed in the text. These results confirm the influence of anthropometric factors on the ultrasonic parameter values, because BUA and SOS were in part dependent on heel width and weight. The influence of the position of the transducer on the calcaneus should be taken into account to optimize the methods of measurement using ultrasound.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Keywords: Bone histomorphometry ; Calcium-47 ; Calcium absorption ; Osteoporosis ; Vitamin D
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Patients with vertebral osteoporosis have a wide range of bone loss rates, bone remodelling rates and capacities for gastrointestinal (GI) calcium absorption. To test the hypothesis that variations in GI absorptive capacity determine rates of bone loss or remodelling, we have sought relationships betwen calcium absorption or vitamin D metabolite levels on the one hand and rates of cancellous and cortical bone loss (measured by serial quantiative computed tomography in the radius;n=25) or indices of bone remodelling in tetracycline-prelabelled transiliac biopsies (n=41) on the other, in a sequential untreated group. Calcium absorption (net and true) was measured in 18-day balances and by a two-isotope deconvolution method (fractional absorption and maximum absorption rate, MAR). There was no significant seasonal effect on any of these four measures of calcium absorption (variance ratio,F=0.52–1.61,p〉0.1) or on 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels (F=0.13,p〉0.1; range 11–69 pg/ml), notwithstanding the expected seasonal effect on 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels (mean 18.7 ng/ml, zenith mid July, semi-amplitude 7.5 ng/ml;F=6.82,p〈0.01). Neither this metabolite nor 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D correlated with any index of calcium absorption (p〉0.1). No measure of calcium absorption (or intake) had a significant relationship with radial cortical or cancellous bone loss (p all 〉0.1) but cancellous bone loss was associated with the rate of endogenous calcium excretion (r=0.50,p〈0.05). A positive relationship between 25-hydroxyvitamin D and unlabelled osteoid surface (a marker of reduced blast vigour) persisted after adjustment for season (Student'st=2.70,p〈0.01) but did not reflect 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels. This study did not address the question of whether reduced GI calcium absorption has a uniform effect on bone remodelling in osteoporosis. However, variations in capacity for calcium absorption are unlikely to be responsible for the heterogeneity in bone loss and remodelling rates seen in vertebral osteoporosis.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Keywords: Aging ; Bone loss ; Bone mineral density ; Broadband ultrasound attenuation ; Speed of sound ; Stiffness index ; Ultrasound
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract We performed repeated ultrasound measurements approximately 2 years apart (average 23 months ±3 months) on the os calcis of 113 healthy postmeno-pausal women recruited from two large prospective cohort studies named OFELY and EPIDOS. Group A (from OFELY) consisted of 88 women aged 52–72 (63±5) years, randomly selected from a large insurance company, and group B (from EPIDOS) consisted of 25 women aged 75–88 (80±4) years, randomly selected from the voting lists. We obtained broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) measurements, as well as the Stiffness index, with a Lunar Achilles ultrasound machine. We performed dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements of femoral neck bone mineral density (neck BMD) with a Hologic QDR 2000 for group A and with a Lunar DPX Plus for group B. The decrease that we observed over 2 years was on average ±1 SD: −1.01±4.6 dB/MHz (p=0.02) for BUA (which is approximately equal to the long-term precision error in vitro), −11.3±9.2 m/s (p=0.0001) for SOS (approximately 5 times the precision error), −3.8±4.2 %YA (p=0.0001) for Stiffness (2.5 times the precision error) and −0.01±0.03 g/cm2 (p=0.0001) for neck BMD (approximately equal to the precision error). In terms of percentage change this represents: −1.0%±4.3% for BUA, −0.8%±0.6% for SOS and −1.85%±4.4% for neck BMD. At the individual level, most SOS and Stiffness values were consistent with a decrease, whereas BUA and neck BMD values were spread out above and below the zero line of no change. The decreases in SOS and Stiffness were significantly larger in the early postmenopause (⩽20 years since menopause [YSM]) than in the late postmenopause (〉20 YSM). We observed a similar trend for BUA and BMD but this did not reach statistical significance. We found a weak but significant correlation between changes in ultrasound variables and changes in neck BMD. However, the 2-year changes observed in SOS were not significantly correlated with changes in BUA. This study suggests that the heel ultrasound measurements of SOS and Stiffness are valuable indices of postmenopausal bone loss, and could be used for follow-up in therapeutic trials.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...