Library

Notes: Background: Lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are highly conserved and widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom. Recent studies demonstrated immunological cross-reactivity between LTP from many botanically unrelated fruits and vegetables and concluded that LTP are pan-allergens. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical relevance of such cross-reactivity in a group of subjects monosensitized to LTP.Methods: Twenty LTP-hypersensitive patients were selected from a population of about 600 subjects with history of Rosaceae allergy by means of: 1) negative skin prick test (SPT) with a commercial birch pollen extract; 2) positive SPT with a commercial plum extract, rich in LTP but virtually lacking both Bet v 1-like proteins and profilin; 3) in-vitro IgE reactivity to the 9–10 kDa fraction of peach peel or immunoblot with peach peel showing a single band at 10 kDa; and 4) total inhibition of reactivity to whole peach extract (containing Bet v 1-related allergen, profilin, and LTP) by purified peach LTP on enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA). Allergy to foods other than Rosaceae was ascertained by careful interview and analysis of medical recordings. SPT with a large series of plant-derived foods were carried out as well. The cross reactivity between LTPs from botanically unrelated plant-derived foods was assessed by ELISA inhibition tests using walnut and peanut extracts as substrate, and peach LTP as inhibitor.Results: All patients reported allergic reactions after the ingestion of at least one from a large number of vegetable foods other than Rosaceae, and in several cases clinical reactions were very severe (anaphylaxis, asthma, urticaria/angioedema). Nuts and peanuts were the most frequently reported causes of allergic reactions (80% and 40% of patients, respectively). All patients showed positive SPT to several non-Rosaceae food extracts. SPT with nuts, peanut, legumes, celery, rice, and corn were positive in the majority of patients. In ELISA inhibition studies, absorption of sera with peach LTP caused complete inhibition of IgE reactivity to walnut and peanut in all cases.Conclusion: LTP is a clinically relevant pan-allergen. Most Rosaceae-allergic, LTP-hypersensitive patients experience adverse reactions after ingestion of botanically unrelated plant-derived foods as well. In view of the high prevalence and severity of the allergic reactions induced, hazelnut, walnut, and peanut should be regarded as potentially hazardous for these patients.

Notes: Little is known about the pharmacokinetics of allergens for local immunotherapy. Thus, we studied the pharmacokinetics in allergic volunteers of a commercial allergenic vaccine in orosoluble tablets (LAIS®, Lofarma S.p.A).The carbamylated monomeric allergoid derived from Parietaria judaica major allergen (Par j 1), characterized by maintenance of the original molecular size, and the native allergen, were radiolabelled with 123I, then incorporated into the commercial soluble tablets and administered to allergic subjects. Early sequential and late static scintigraphic acquisitions were performed, and plasma radioactivity was measured at different time intervals.No difference in local pharmacokinetics was observed between the allergen and the allergoid: part of the tracer was retained in the mouth for at least 2 h after swallowing. No direct absorption through the oral mucosa could be detected, as plasma radioactivity increased only after swallowing and peaked at 2 h. However, the plasma peak attained with the allergoid in tablets was significantly higher with respect to the native allergen. Finally, some undegraded allergoid, but not the allergen, could be constantly detected in the bloodstream at plasma peak.The results showed a similar behaviour of the allergoid and the allergen in tablets as far as their local kinetics are concerned, whereas plasma peak was higher with the allergoid than with the allergen. Therefore we conclude that the chemical modification of the allergen may affect its pharmacokinetics, by making it less susceptible to enzymatic degradation.

Notes: Background:  Exposure and contact with bee moth (Galleria mellonella) larvae (Gm) can cause an allergic reaction both in anglers and breeders. We described the case of an amateur fisherman who experienced an allergic reaction using Gm but not using heat-treated Gm (h-Gm) (mummies). The aim of this study was to demonstrate by immunoblotting and radioallergosorbent test (RAST)-inhibition experiments the loss of allergenic epitopes in h-Gm extracts.Methods:  Galleria mellonella larvae and h-Gm were homogenized and extracted at 10% (w/v) in 0.5 M phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 containing 0.5% NaN3 for 16 h at 4°C. Gm and h-Gm extracts were electrophoresed in a 10% polyacrylamide precast Nupage Bis–Tris gel at 180 mA for 1 h and the resolved proteins stained with 0.1% Coomassie brilliant blue and the molecular weight calculated. For the immunoblotting detection of allergenic components the resolved extracts were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane and incubated with the patient's serum. Bound specific-IgE was detected by peroxidase-conjugated anti-human IgE. RAST inhibition experiments were performed according to the Ceska method.Results:  The protein profile of Gm and h-Gm extracts resulted markedly different in number, intensity and the position of bands, indicating that heat-treatment modifies the chemical–physical characteristics of the protein contents. The Gm extract showed a strong-coloured band at 73 kDa and more than 20 components ranging from 12 to 133 kDa; h-Gm showed two main band at 77 and 38 kDa and about 15 faint bands between 20 and 133 kDa apparently without any correspondence to the bands present in the Gm extract. Immunoblotting with the patient's serum demonstrated several bands of reactivity with the Gm extract ranging from 20 to 100 kDa and no recognizable bands, but only a diffuse smear with h-Gm. When used in a RAST inhibition experiment the h-Gm extract demonstrated an inability to compete with the Gm one for the binding to patient's IgE serum.Conclusions:  The h-Gm seems to lose the allergenic epitopes and has two advantages for anglers: to avoid new possible sensitizations as well as allergic symptoms in sensitized people, without interfering with their skills and satisfaction in their fishing performance.

Notes: Background:  The use of ammoniated or nonammoniated latex extracts for the diagnosis of latex allergy is still a matter of debate. The aim of our study was to compare the characteristics of the two types of extracts by immunoblotting and RAST techniques in children with ascertained latex allergy.Methods:  Ammoniated (AL) and nonammoniated latex (NAL) extracts were prepared and blotted on SDS-PAGE to resolve their components. Also a solid phase for RAST assays was prepared with the two extracts. The sera from 18 children (mean age 11.4 years, range 6–15 years), with ascertained latex allergy (clinical history, skin test, CAP-RAST and provocation) were used for the experiments.Results:  The NAL extract is resolved in many bands (5–100 kDa), whereas AL showed only few components, likely Hev b 4, 6 and 7. IgE reactivity against AL was observed only in 5/18 patients, whereas 12/18 were positive with NAL. The blotting profile against NAL was complex and the IgE recognition pattern involved different bands.Conclusion:  The extract obtained from NAL is able to detect specific IgE against a greater number of allergenic determinants, and therefore a greater diagnostic accuracy can be expected.

Notes: Background: Allergens in Plantago lanceolata have not been characterized yet. The objective was to characterize some plantain-pollen allergens and to investigate the cross-reactivity between plantain and grass pollens. Methods: Sera from four patients monosensitive to plantain pollen and from eight grass-pollen-allergic patients showing strong skin reactivity to plantain pollen in the skin prick test (SPT) underwent immunoblot analysis with both Plantago and grass mix extract. Moreover, immunoblot inhibition experiments were done with grass mix extract as inhibitor. Results: All four sera from plantain-allergic patients reacted to two distinct bands at 17 and 19 kDa, and 2/4 sera showed further reactivity to a 40-kDa protein, which in one case represented the most prominent IgE-binding allergen. Plantain-monosensitive subjects did not show any reactivity to grass-pollen extract, and preabsorption of their sera with grass-pollen extract did not cause any loss of reactivity to plantain pollen. Sera from all eight grass-pollen-allergic controls reacted to a 30-kDa protein in plantain pollen, and some sera showed cross-reactivity to higher and lower molecular-weight structures as well. In all cases, plantain reactivity was totally abolished by preabsorption of sera with grass-pollen extract. A preliminary investigation by immunoblot showed that polyclonal IgG anti-Phl p 5 (but not polyclonal Phl p 1) from rabbit reacted to a 30-kDa protein in plantain pollen. Conclusions: Three specific allergens (of 17, 19, and 40 kDa, respectively) have been detected in plantain pollen. Further studies on a larger number of patients will determine whether these proteins may be considered major allergens. Cross-reactivity between grass and plantain pollen is mainly caused by a 30-kDa protein in plantain pollen. Group 5 grass-pollen allergen is probably responsible for most grass/plantain cross-reactivity.

Notes: Summary L-Alanosine [L-2-amino-3(N-hydroxy-N-nitrosamino)propionic acid], a tumor-inhibiting agent, induces pregnancy arrest after single or multiple SC or PO administration to rats and hamsters. Its contragestational effects are dose-and route-dependent, with no important differences in species-sensitivity or administration schedules.L-Alanosine is maximally effective shortly (3–4 days) after implantation. Both placenta and fetus appear to be target tissues. Consistent with previous in vitro findings, adenine but not aspartic acid counteracts the contragestational action ofL-alanosine. The ‘contragestational test’, i.e., the effect on conceptus growth, appears to be an interesting approach for learning more about the antiproliferative activity of an antineoplastic agent.