Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1468-3083
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Recent data in the literature indicate that antigen-presenting cells (APC) are inactive in tumour tissue because of local immunosuppression. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) signal activation transducing mechanisms are also seriously impaired. Administration of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) may lead to APC recovery and interleukin (IL)-2 may restore local TIL activation. Moreover, IL-2 increases the systemic lymphocyte population, an event that seems to correlate with a better prognosis.〈section xml:id="abs1-3"〉〈title type="main"〉Study designThe present phase I–II study was carried out to examine whether intralesional injection of GM-CSF followed by subcutaneous IL-2 would induce a clinical response in advanced, pretreated elderly melanoma patients.〈section xml:id="abs1-4"〉〈title type="main"〉MethodsSixteen patients over 60 years of age received intralesional GM-CSF (150 ng per lesion on day 1), generally divided between the two largest cutaneous lesions, followed by perilesional subcutaneous IL-2 (3 000 000 IU) for 5 days (days 3–7 inclusive) every 3 weeks.〈section xml:id="abs1-5"〉〈title type="main"〉ResultsFour clinical responses [two partial (PR) and two minimal (MR)] (25%), which also involved lesions that had not been directly treated, and nine cases of stable disease were observed. The response duration for PR and MR was 9, 4, 4 and 2.5+ months, respectively. Stable disease (56%) recorded in the nine patients was short-term (3–6 months). Three patients rapidly progressed after two, two and one therapy cycles, respectively. The patient who reached the best PR had a fairly high absolute lymphocyte count (1600–2400/mm3). The second one, who reached complete remission after subsequent locoregional chemotherapy and hyperthermia, however, had a low absolute lymphocyte count that had doubled by the end of treatment. Blood lymphocyte values in the other patients were too varied to allow any correlation with clinical response. Therapy was well tolerated and only mild fever was observed, with the exception of one patient who had grade 3 fever, with muscle pain and arthralgia.〈section xml:id="abs1-6"〉〈title type="main"〉ConclusionsConsidering the very low toxicity observed, this treatment might be indicated in elderly patients for whom systemic therapy is no longer a viable option. Improved scheduling and timing could result from further studies.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-2277
    Keywords: Key words Organ procurement ; Organ transplantation ; Procurement programme efficiency ; Transplant Programe efficiency ; Evaluation indexes
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The number of donations per million population (pmp) per year and the number of transplants pmp/year enables one to compare donation or transplant programs made in different years in the same area or made the same year in different areas. These pmp indexes may be integrated with an evaluation system by which each organ is evaluated separately in terms of the efficiency of its procurement and transplant systems using the procurement index (percentage in terms of number of organs utilized/number of organs procurable from donors utilized in a single area during 1 year) and the transplant index (percentage in terms of number of transplants performed/number of organs harvested in a single area during 1 year). We have called them Caldes I (procurement) and Caldes II (transplant) indexes. The harvest index evaluates the efficiency of utilization of organs retrieved from suitable donors. It usually ranges between 80–90 % for the kidney, 70–95 % for the liver, 40–50 % for the heart, and 5–15 % for the lungs. The transplant index evaluates for each organ the transplant team capacity to use available organs which can be harvested locally or in different areas. It usually ranges between 60–120 %. Index determination did not require information different from the standard data available. Both the harvest and transplant indexes could be used to compare the efficiency of donation and transplant programs and policies in the same area during different years or at the same time in different areas. They can be critical in evaluating: (a) marginal donor utilization, (b) marginal organ utilization, and (c) dishomogeneity of organ retrieval and organ transplantation in different regions belonging to the same area. They also enable to evaluate if organs considered not available in a single area are offered to other areas or are not retrieved at all from available donors.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...