Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1995-1999  (2)
  • 1965-1969
  • 1960-1964
  • Ulam's game  (2)
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Machine learning 25 (1996), S. 71-110 
    ISSN: 0885-6125
    Keywords: On-line learning ; conversion strategies ; noise robustness ; binomial weights ; exponential weights ; weighted majority algorithm ; expert advice ; mistake bounds ; Ulam's game
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Computer Science
    Notes: Abstract We study the problem of deterministically predicting boolean values by combining the boolean predictions of several experts. Previous on-line algorithms for this problem predict with the weighted majority of the experts' predictions. These algorithms give each expert an exponential weight β m where β is a constant in [0, 1) andm is the number of mistakes made by the expert in the past. We show that it is better to use sums of binomials as weights. In particular, we present a deterministic algorithm using binomial weights that has a better worst case mistake bound than the best deterministic algorithm using exponential weights. The binomial weights naturally arise from a version space argument. We also show how both exponential and binomial weighting schemes can be used to make prediction algorithms robust against noise.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Machine learning 25 (1996), S. 71-110 
    ISSN: 0885-6125
    Keywords: On-line learning ; conversion strategies ; noise robustness ; binomial weights ; exponential weights ; weighted majority algorithm ; expert advice ; mistake bounds ; Ulam's game
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Computer Science
    Notes: Abstract We study the problem of deterministically predicting boolean valuesby combining the boolean predictions of several experts.Previous on-line algorithms for this problem predict with the weightedmajority of the experts' predictions.These algorithms give each expert an exponential weight βmwhere β is a constant in [0,1) and m is the number of mistakesmade by the expert in the past. We show that it is better to usesums of binomials as weights.In particular, we present a deterministic algorithmusing binomial weights that has a better worst case mistake bound than thebest deterministic algorithm using exponential weights.The binomial weights naturally arise from a version space argument.We also show how both exponential and binomial weighting schemes can beused to make prediction algorithms robust against noise.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...