Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: CPT-11 ; Irinotecan ; Topotecan ; Camptothecin ; Topoisomerases ; Xenografts
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The efficacy of protracted schedules of therapy of the topoisomerase I inhibitors 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan) and 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (irinotecan; CPT-11) were evaluated against a panel of 21 human tumor xenografts derived from adult and pediatric malignancies. Tumors included eight colon adenocarcinomas, representing an intrinsically chemorefractory malignancy, six lines derived from childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (three embryonal, three alveolar) representing a chemoresponsive histiotype, sublines of rhabdomyosarcomas selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine and melphalan, and three pediatric brain tmors. All tumors were grown at the subcutaneous site. Topotecan was administered by oral gavage 5 days per week for 12 consecutive weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 1.5 mg/kg per dose. Irinotecan was given by i.v. administration daily for 5 days each week for 2 weeks [(d×5)2] (one cycle of therapy), repeated every 21 days. The MTD for three cycles was 10 mg/kg per dose. Treatment was started against advanced tumors. Topotecan caused a high frequency of objective regressions in one of eight colon tumor lines, whereas irinotecan caused complete regressions (CR) of all tumors in three colon lines and a high frequency of CRs in three additional lines. Both drugs demonstrated similar activity against rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. Topotecan caused CR of all tumors in four of six lines, and irinotecan in five of six lines evaluated. Both agents retained full activity against tumors selected for primary resistance to vincristine, but only irinotecan retained activity against a tumor selected for primary resistance to melphalan. Both agents demonstrated good activity against brain tumor xenografts with irinotecan causing CR in two of three lines and topotecan inducing CR in one of three lines. Results indicate that low-dose protracted schedules of daily administration of these topoisomerase I inhibitors is either equi-effective or more efficacious than more intense shorter schedules of administration reported previously.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Key words CPT-11 ; Topoisomerase I ; CNS tumors ; Xenograft ; Camptothecin
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  Therapy of patients with malignant central nervous system tumors is frequently unsuccessful, reflecting limitations of current surgical, radiotherapeutic, and pharmacotherapeutic treatments. The camptothecin derivative irinotecan (CPT-11) has been shown to possess antitumor activity in phase II trials for patients with carcinoma of the lung, cervix, ovary, colon, or rectum and for patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The current study was designed to test the efficacy of the drug against a panel of human tumor xenografts derived from adult and pediatric central nervous system malignancies. Tumors included childhood high-grade gliomas (D-212 MG, D-456 MG), adult high-grade gliomas (D-54 MG, D-245 MG), medulloblastomas (D341 Med, D487 Med), ependymomas (D528 EP, D612 EP), and a rhabdomyosarcoma (TE-671), as well as sublines with demonstrated resistance to busulfan (D-456 MG (BR)), cyclophosphamide (TE-671 CR), procarbazine (D-245 MG (PR)) or melphalan (TE-671 MR), growing subcutaneously and intracranially in athymic nude mice. In replicate experiments, CPT-11 was given at a dosage of 40 mg/kg per dose via intraperitoneal injection in 10% dimethylsulfoxide on days 1–5 and 8–12, which is the dosage lethal to 10% of treated animals. CPT-11 produced statistically significant (P〈0.001) growth delays in all subcutaneous xenografts tested, including those resistant to busulfan, cyclophosphamide, procarbazine, and melphalan, with growth delays ranging from 21.3 days in D487 Med to 90+ days in several tumor lines. Further, tumor regression was evident in every treated animal bearing a subcutaneous tumor, with some xenografts yielding complete tumor regression. Statistically significant (P〈0.001) increases in survival were demonstrated in the two intracranial xenografts – D341 EP (73.0% increase) and D-456 MG (114.2% increase) – treated with CPT-11. These studies demonstrate that, of over 40 drugs evaluated in this laboratory, CPT-11 is the most active against central nervous system xenografts and should be advanced to clinical trial as soon as possible.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Key words CPT-11 ; Irinotecan ; Topotecan ; Camptothecin ; Topoisomerases ; Xenografts
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  The efficacy of protracted schedules of therapy of the topoisomerase I inhibitors 9-dimethyl-aminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (topotecan) and 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxy-amptothecin (irinotecan; CPT-11) were evaluated against a panel of 21 human tumor xenografts derived from adult and pediatric malignancies. Tumors included eight colon adenocarcinomas, representing an intrinsically chemorefractory malignancy, six lines derived from childhood rhabdomyosarcoma (three embryonal, three alveolar) representing a chemoresponsive histiotype, sublines of rhabdomyosarcomas selected in vivo for resistance to vincristine and melphalan, and three pediatric brain tmors. All tumors were grown at the subcutaneous site. Topotecan was administered by oral gavage 5 days per week for 12 consecutive weeks. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 1.5 mg/kg per dose. Irinotecan was given by i.v. administration daily for 5 days each week for 2 weeks [(d×5)2] (one cycle of therapy), repeated every 21 days. The MTD for three cycles was 10 mg/kg per dose. Treatment was started against advanced tumors. Topotecan caused a high frequency of objective regressions in one of eight colon tumor lines, whereas irinotecan caused complete regressions (CR) of all tumors in three colon lines and a high frequency of CRs in three additional lines. Both drugs demonstrated similar activity against rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. Topotecan caused CR of all tumors in four of six lines, and irinotecan in five of six lines evaluated. Both agents retained full activity against tumors selected for primary resistance to vincristine, but only irinotecan retained activity against a tumor selected for primary resistance to melphalan. Both agents demonstrated good activity against brain tumor xenografts with irinotecan causing CR in two of three lines and topotecan inducing CR in one of three lines. Results indicate that low-dose protracted schedules of daily administration of these topoisomerase I inhibitors is either equi-effective or more efficacious than more intense shorter schedules of administration reported previously.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...