Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of molecular medicine 59 (1981), S. 1177-1188 
    ISSN: 1432-1440
    Keywords: Etoposide ; Mechanisms of action ; Pharmacoclinetics ; Toxicity ; Clinical activity ; Cancer ; Etoposid ; Wirkungsmechanismus ; Pharmakokinetik ; Toxizität ; Klinische Aktivität ; Krebs
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Etoposid ist ein halbsynthetisches Podophyllotoxinderivat mit einem breiten zytostatischen Wirkungsspektrum und relativ günstigem therapeutischen Index. Tierexperimentell zeigt diese Substanz einen Synergismus mitCis-Platin, Cyclophosphamid, BCNU und Cytosinarabinosid. Die Wirkmechanismen sind Hemmung des Nukleosidtransports in die Zelle, Störung der DNA- und RNA-Synthese, Einzelstrangbrüche, Störung der Proteinsynthese und Hemmung mikrotubulärer Proteine. In niedriger Konzentration wirkt Etoposid zellzyklusphasenspezifisch mit Akkumulation in der G2-Phase, in höherer Konzentration auch phasenunspezifisch. Am geeignetsten unter dem Aspekt von Wirkung und Toxizität ist die intravenöse oder orale Applikation in fraktionierten Dosen von 80–120 mg/m2 an 3–5 aufeinanderfolgenden Tagen und Wiederholung nach 21 [14–28] Tagen. Neben der dosislimitierenden Knochenmarkstoxizität sind weitere Nebenwirkungen Übelkeit, Erbrechen, Fieber, Kopfschmerz, Hypotension, Phlebitis, Mukositis, Neuropathie, Kardiotoxizität, Alopezie. Etoposid gehört zu den wirksamsten Substanzen beim kleinzelligen Bronchuskarzinom mit einer Ansprechrate von 37% (10% CR) und hat eine hohe Aktivität beim NHL (36%), Hodenkarzinom (37%), Chorion Karzinom der Frau (35%), beim Neuroblastom (29%) und bei der AMML (35%). Die Aktivität von Etoposid in Kombination mit anderen aktiven Substanzen bei diesen Tumoren wird in zur Zeit laufenden Studien untersucht; beim kleinzelligen Bronchuskarzinom sowie beim testikulären Karzinom und Non-Hodgkin-Lymphom wird Etoposid in Zukunft zu den Substanzen der ersten Wahl gehören können.
    Notes: Summary Etoposide is a semisynthetic podophyllotoxin derivative with a broad spectrum of antitumor activity and a relatively high therapeutic index. The synergism in animal withcis-platinum, cyclophosphamide, BCNU, and cytosinarabinoside is interesting for combination regimen. Mechanisms of action are inhibition of nucleoside transfer and of DNA and RNA synthesis, single stranded breaks, inhibition of protein synthesis and of microtubular assembly. While in lower concentrations etoposide is acting cell-cycle-dependent with accumulation of cells in the G2-phase it has, in high concentrations, also a cellcycle-phase-unspecific lethal effect. Most suitable is the oral and i.v. application of etoposide in fractionated doses of 80–120 mg/m2 on 3–5 consecutive days and repetition after 21 [14–28] days. Side effects are dose-limiting bone marrow toxicity, nausea, vomiting, fever, hypotension, phlebitis, mucositis, neuropathy, cardiotoxicity, alopecia. Etoposide is one of the most active single agents in small-cell bronchus carcinoma with a remission rate of 37% (10% CR), and is very active in NHL (36%), testicular carcinoma (37%), AMML (35%), choriocarcinoma (35%), and neuroblastoma (29%). The role of etoposide in combination with other active drugs in these tumors is currently investigated in bronchus and testicular carcinoma and NHL, where etoposide will belong to the drugs of the first choice in the future.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-1440
    Keywords: Pleural mesothelioma ; Prospective therapeutic study ; Combined modality treatment ; Prognostic variables
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary Between March 1981 and February 1985, 93 out of 132 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma were eligible for therapy and were prospectively assigned to receive either combined therapy or best supportive care, according to their personal preferences. Fifty-seven patients underwent multimodal therapy including surgical resection where possible, polychemotherapy, and radiation therapy in case of partial remission. Thirty-six patients received maximal supportive care only, as did 39 patients who were not eligible for treatment. The median survival was 13 months for treated patients compared to 7 for those receiving best supportive care and 5 for patients not amenable to treatment. Median progress-free survival was 6, 2, and 1 month respectively. Surgical resection did not prolong life expectancy within the treated group. In view of significant differences in the distribution of various cofactors over the two study groups, stepwise Cox model analyses were performed. Prognostic nontreatment variables related to prolonged survival were: good performance status, stage I and II, absence of chest pain, age below 50 years, and epithelial histology. Although in the Cox model analyses the survival improvement of patients being treated could be greatly attributed to other cofactors, multimodal treatment showed some prolongation of life expectancy.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...