ISSN:
0020-7608
Keywords:
Computational Chemistry and Molecular Modeling
;
Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
Source:
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
Topics:
Chemistry and Pharmacology
Notes:
This paper provides an analysis of the reasons for the approximate validity of the relation \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ E = \frac{3}{7}NV(0) $\end{document}, between the total energy E of a neutral atom, the number N of electrons, and the electronic potential at the nucleus V(0). Using the density functional formalism we find that the right-hand side of the above equation also appears (and is the leading term) in density functional approximations more sophisticated than the Thomas-Fermi (TF) approximation (the above equation is exact in the TF approximation). Systematic improvements to the equation appear to be difficult because the main corrections come from those terms which are more difficult to handle in the density functional formalism. After this analysis we propose a kinetic energy functional for neutral atoms in the Hartree-Fock approximation. The first term of this new functional is a rescaled Thomas-Fermi term \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ T_0^\gamma = (1 + \gamma)\int {\frac{3}{{10}}(3\pi ^2){}^{2/3}\rho ^{5/3} d{\rm r}} $$\end{document}, where γ = -0.0063 for light atoms and γ = 0.0085 for the others. The second term is the first gradient correction due to Kirzhnits \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$$ T_2 = \frac{1}{{72}}\int {\frac{{(\nabla \rho)^2 }}{\rho }d{\rm r}} $$\end{document}.For lithium to krypton atoms, this new functional gives an average error of 0.22%.
Additional Material:
1 Ill.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/qua.560220510
Permalink
