Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 1975-1979  (1)
Material
Years
Year
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Plant and soil 49 (1978), S. 91-103 
    ISSN: 1573-5036
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
    Notes: Summary The influence of soil moisture content and soil water potential on plant water potential, transpiration and net-photosynthesis of potted larch (Larix decidua), spruce (Picea abies) and pine (Pinus cembra) was studied under constant and close to optimum conditions in a laboratory. The ‘equilibrium’ plant water potential measured under ‘non-transpiring’ conditions came close to soil water potential, but in moist soil the equilibrium potential was slightly lower, particularly in larch where transpiration was not fully arrested. In very dry soil, plants had higher water potential than soil, presumably due to roots exploiting the wettest points within the soil. Pine, spruce and larch utilised a large part of soil moisture (down to 25wt.% soil water content or −1.5 bars potential) while maintaining plant water potential near −8, −9.5 and −12.5 bars respectively. A similar pattern occurred in dry soil. The differences between species are explained by differing stomatal sensitivity to water potential. Pine began a gradual reduction in gas-exchange below a soil water potential of −0.4 bars. Larch showed no marked reduction until the soil potential fell to −3.5 bars but below this the shut-down in gas-exchange was rapid. Spruce lay in between. In spite of the early and sensitive gas-exchange reduction with decreasing soil moisture, pine maintained the highest net photosynthesis/transpiration ratio and thus used limited soil water more slowly and economically than the other species. Seedlings maintained a higher rate of gas-exchange in strong light than in weak light, especially at low soil water potentials.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...