ISSN:
1573-1987
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science, Production Engineering, Mining and Metallurgy, Traffic Engineering, Precision Mechanics
Notes:
Summary In comparing the speeds of the various microradiographic methods, it has been usual to take as basis the exposure time needed for recording the X-ray image. It is more realistic to include the time required to make available the information stored in the negative, by producing an image magnified up to the resolution of the eye. From this point of view the projection method is much faster than the times-two method or contact microradiography, for a given field of view, i.e., they stand in reverse order to that of their initial exposure times. In given camera length, on the other hand, the initial exposure is the same for both projection and contact, and is much longer for the times-two method. But the overall time for production of the final image is now much the same for all three methods. As regards resolution, the projection method offers the best ultimate performance.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02282021
Permalink
