Bibliothek

Notizen: Abstract Background: BCH-4556 ((-)-2′-deoxy-3′-oxacytidine) is an L-nucleoside analogue shown to have broad preclinical anticancer activity, particularly against solid neoplasms such as prostate, renal, and hepatoma in vitro and in vivo, in contrast to cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) which is preferentially active against leukemia. Materials and methods: The antitumor activity of BCH-4556 was evaluated using human tumor colony-forming unit (HTCFU) assay, in which fresh tumor specimens were taken directly from patients with and without prior chemotherapy. Results: Overall, in vitro responses (50% or less survival compared to untreated controls) were observed in 11% (two of 18), 29% (five of 17) and 50% (nine of 18) of specimens treated for one hour with BCH-4556 at 1, 10 and 100 µg/ml, respectively; and 16% (nine of 55), 32% (24 of 74), 48% (35 of 73) and 65% (11 of 17) of specimens treated continuously with BCH-4556 at 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µg/ml, respectively. With the one-hour schedule, a significant difference in response rates was noted between 100 µg/ml and 1 µg/ml (P = 0.02). With the continuous schedule, significant differences in response rates were observed between 1 µg/ml and 0.1 µg/ml (P = 0.02), between 10 µg/ml and 0.1 µg/ml (P = 0.0001), as well as between 10 µg/ml and 1 µg/ml (P = 0.01). A trend suggesting the superiority of continuous exposure was observed in paired specimens (n = 18) at comparable drug concentrations. Activity was noted against ovarian (nine of 16 = 56%), renal (three of four = 75%), and melanoma (two of two = 100%) HTCFU at 10 µg/ml using the continuous schedule. Comparisons between BCH-4556 and paclitaxel were made in 32 specimens at 10 µg/ml using the continuous exposure. Twenty-three specimens showed similar responses with both drugs; seven showed better responses with BCH-4556; and two showed better responses with paclitaxel (P = 0.18). Conclusions: Promising activity was observed with BCH-4556 against ovarian, renal, and melanoma HTCFU. There appeared to be a positive relationship between BCH-4556 concentration and response using both one-hour and continuous exposures. Continuous exposure to BCH-4556 provided high response rates especially at concentrations above 10 µg/ml. For both one-hour and continuous exposures, BCH-4556 had similar, and at times, greater potency than paclitaxel against the same tumor specimens in the present study.

Notizen: Abstract Background:This study was performed to evaluate thepharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and feasibility of a combined oralformulation of 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and eniluracil (Glaxo Wellcome Inc.,Research Triangle Park, North Carolina), an inactivator of dihydropyrimidinedehydrogenase (DPD). The rationale for developing a combined eniluracil/5-FUformulation oral dosing form is to simplify treatment with these agents, whichhas been performed using separate dosing forms, and decrease the probabilityof severe toxicity and/or suboptimal therapeutic results caused byinadvertently high or conversely insufficient 5-FU dosing. Patients and methods:The trial was a randomized, three-waycrossover bioequivalence study of three oral dosing forms of eniluracil/5-FUtablets in adults with solid malignancies. Each period consisted of two daysof treatment and a five- to seven-day washout phase. Eniluracil at a dose of20 mg, which results in maximal DPD inactivation, was administered twice dailyon the first day and in the evening on the second day of each of the threetreatments. On the morning of the second day, all patients received a totaleniluracil dose of 20 mg orally and a total 5-FU dose of 2 mg orally as eitherseparate tablets (treatment A) or combined eniluracil/5-FU tablets in twodifferent strengths (2 tablets of eniluracil/5-FU at a strength (mg/mg) of10/1 (treatment B) or 8 tablets at a strength of 2.5/0.25 (treatment C)). Thepharmacokinetics of plasma 5-FU, eniluracil, and uracil, and the urinaryexcretion of eniluracil, 5-FU, uracil, and α-fluoro-β-alanine (FBAL),were studied. To determine the bioequivalence of the combined eniluracil/5-FUdosing forms compared to the separate tablets, an analysis of variance onpharmacokinetic parameters reflecting eniluracil and 5-FU exposure wasperformed. Results:Thirty-nine patients with advanced solid malignancies hadcomplete pharmacokinetic studies performed during treatments A, B, and C. Thepharmacokinetics of eniluracil and 5-FU were similar among the three types oftreatment. Both strengths of the combined eniluracil/5-FU dosing form and theseparate dosing forms were bioequivalent. Mean values for terminal half-life,systemic clearance, and apparent volume of distribution for oral 5-FU duringtreatments A/B/C were 5.5/5.6/5.6 hours, 6.6/6.6/6.5 liters/hour, and50.7/51.5/50.0 liters, respectively. The intersubject coefficient of variationfor pharmacokinetic variables reflecting 5-FU exposure and clearance intreatments ranged from 23% to 33%. The urinary excretion ofunchanged 5-FU over 24 hours following treatments A, B, and C averaged52.2%, 56.1%, and 50.8% of the administered dose of 5-FU,respectively. Parameters reflecting DPD inhibition, including plasma uraciland urinary FBAL excretion following treatments A, B, and C were similar.Toxicity was generally mild and similar following all three types oftreatments. Conclusions:The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and eniluracil weresimilar and met bioequivalence criteria following treatment with the separateoral formulations of 5-FU and eniluracil and two strengths of the combinedformulation. The availability of a combined eniluracil/5-FU oral dosing formwill likely simplify dosing and decrease the probability of severe toxicityor suboptimal therapeutic results caused by an inadvertent 5-FU overdose orinsufficient 5-FU dosing in the case of separate oral formulations, therebyenhancing the overall feasibility and therapeutic index of oral 5-FU therapy.