Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1573-7241
    Keywords: adenosine ; A1 receptor agonist ; GR79236 ; infarct size ; ischemia-reperfusion ; reperfusion injury
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Adenosine A1 receptor agonists given prior to myocardial ischemia limit ischemic injury in several species. However, the ability of adenosine receptor agonists to limit infarct size when given at reperfusion has proved controversial. We designed a three-center experimental study using a blinded, randomized treatment protocol to test the hypothesis that adenosine A1 receptor activation during early reperfusion can attenuate lethal reperfusion injury, thereby reducing infarct size. Sixty anesthetized rabbits (20 in each laboratory) underwent 30 minutes coronary artery occlusion followed by 120 minutes reperfusion. The selective adenosine A1 receptor agonist GR79236 (10.5 μg/kg, a dose shown to limit infarction in this model when given before ischemia) or vehicle were administered IV 10 minutes before reperfusion. Infarct size was assessed by tetrazolium staining and, after the randomization code was revealed, data from the three laboratories were pooled for statistical analysis. Infarct size was not modified by administration of GR79236. In the vehicle-treated group, the infarct-to-risk ratio was 28.9 ± 2.7% (n = 24) compared with 31.9 ± 2.6% (n = 26) in the GR79236-treated group (not significant). Risk zone volume was similar in the two groups (1.06 ± 0.05 cm3 vs 1.00 ± 0.05 cm3, respectively). A modest reduction in rate-pressure product was noted following the administration of GR79236, but this effect was transient. The same dose of GR79236 was found to limit infarct size when given prior to coronary artery occlusion. We conclude that A1 receptor activation does not modify lethal reperfusion injury in myocardium.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1435-1803
    Keywords: Key words Hypothermia – ischemic preconditioning – myocardial infarction – myocytes – rabbit
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The present study describes a method for rapidly cooling the whole body via its blood pool and tests whether cooling instituted after ischemia has begun can sill limit infarction. We also evaluated whether the cardiac protection seen with cooling could be added to that from ischemic preconditioning. Recently it was reported that lowering myocardial temperature by only several degrees greatly slows the extent of myocardial infarction in the beating heart experiencing regional ischemia. To further explore the potential of hypothermia for myocardial protection, rabbits underwent either a 30-, 45- or 60-min coronary artery occlusion and 3-h reperfusion. Blood from a carotid artery was allowed to circulate through a heat exchanger immersed in ice water and return to a jugular vein until the blood temperature in the left atrium reached the target temperature of 35 or 32°C. Furthermore, to elucidate the mechanism of hypothermia's protection, we also examined its effect on isolated cardiomyocytes. Rewarming began upon reperfusion in all protocols. Cooling to 32°C before a 30-min ischemia reduced infarct size from 37.3±2.5% (n=6) of the risk zone in normothermic controls to 3.6±0.3% (n=6). When cooling was begun 10 or 20 min after the onset of ischemia infarct size was still significantly smaller [8.1±1.2% and 22.8±1.8%, respectively (n=6 in each group)]. Less but significant protection was also seen with cooling to 35°:C. Cooling caused only mild bradycardia and hypotension and no apparent arrhythmias. Forty-five min of regional ischemia caused 50.7±3.3% (n=6) of risk zone to infarct in untreated hearts. Preconditioning with 5-min ischemia/10-min reperfusion reduced infarct size to 27.5±2.5% (n=6). Cooling to 32°C starting 20 min after the onset of ischemia protected the heart (28.7±2.6% infarction, n=8), and this protection could be added to the effect from ischemic preconditioning delayed the progressive increase in osmotic fragility that occurs during simulated ischemia in an additive way, but only hypothermia delayed the appearance of contracture suggesting that different mechanisms are involved. Hence blood pool cooling was easily induced and well tolerated and protected the beating heart against infarction even when hypothermia was started after the onset of coronary occlusion. We conclude that hypothermia might be a simple and useful therapy for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...