Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0789
    Keywords: Denitrification ; Ammonia volatilization ; Wetland rice soils ; Urea ; 15N-balance method
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Geosciences , Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
    Notes: Summary The relative importance of ammonia volatilization and denitrification as loss processes following the application of urea to flooded rice by the traditional method was assessed at four sites with different characteristics in the Philippines. The effect of reducing ammonia loss on denitrification and total N loss was also studied. The total N loss was determined by a 15N-balance method and ammonia volatilization was assessed by a bulk aerodynamic method following the application of urea to small plots (4.8×5.2 m). As run-off was prevented and leaching losses were negligible, the denitrification loss was assessed as the difference between total N loss and ammonia loss. When urea was broadcast into the floodwater at transplanting, the ammonia loss varied from 10% to 56% of the applied N. Loss was smallest at Aguilar where wind speeds were low and the greatest at Mabitac where floodwater pH values and temperatures were high and the winds were strong. The ammonia loss was reduced at all sites by incorporating the urea into the soil by harrowing. However, the reduction achieved varied markedly between sites, with the largest reduction (from 56% to 7% loss of the applied N) being observed at Mabitac. The total N lost from the basal application into the floodwater ranged from 59% to 71% of the applied N. Incorporating the urea by harrowing reduced the total N loss at two sites, increased the total N loss at the third site, and had no effect at the fourth site. The denitrification losses ranged widely (from 3% to 50% of the applied N) when urea was broadcast into the floodwater at the four sites. The denitrification loss was low when the ammonia loss was high (Mabitac) and high when the ammonia loss was low (Aguilar). Reducing ammonia losses by incorporating the urea into the flooded soil resulted in increased denitrification losses at three of the sites and appeared to have no effect on denitrification at the fourth site. The results show that reducing the ammonia loss by incorporating urea into the soil does not necessarily result in reduced total N loss, and suggest that the efficiency of fertilizer N will be improved only when both N-loss processes are controlled simultaneously.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Nutrient cycling in agroecosystems 26 (1990), S. 157-167 
    ISSN: 1573-0867
    Keywords: Ammonia volatilization ; green manure ; partially acidulated phosphate rock ; integrated nutrient management
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
    Notes: Abstract The use of N fertilizer in Asia has increased from 24 to 39% of the world's total consumption between 1973 and 1987/88. Approximately 60% of the N fertilizer consumed in Asia is used on rice (Oryza sativa L.). However, the N applied to rice, primarily as urea, is not effectively utilized by the crop. Ammonia volatilization is recognized as a major mechanism of N loss, causing ineffective N utilization. Basal incorporation of urea without standing water; deep placement of urea; and modification of urea with algicides, urea inhibitors or coatings are strategies to reduce ammonia loss. Loss of N by nitrification-denitrification may be a serious problem particularly when soil is dried between rice crops, then flooded for the subsequent rice crop. The use of organic N sources, such as green manure and organic manures, as partial substitutes of inorganic N fertilizer is receiving renewed research interest. The use of P fertilizers for rice is most necessary on Oxisols and Ultisols with high P-fixing capacity. Phosphate rock and partially acidulated phosphate rock are alternatives to soluble P sources used on these soils. Response to K is normally highest on light-textured soils. The limited available information suggests that in lowland rice-upland crop rotations, K fertilizers should be applied to the non-rice crop. Zinc deficiency can be overcome through (a) use of varieties more tolerant to zinc deficiency, (b) application of zinc sulfate, and (c) dipping seedling roots in a zinc oxide suspension. Increasing use of S-free fertilizers, intensive cropping, and use of high yielding rice varieties have led to S deficiency in many rice growing countries. Sulfur deficiency can be corrected by applying S-containing materials even with elemental S. Residual effects have also been reported even at a low rate of 20 kg S/ha. Thus, S does not need to be applied every season. To address the unresolved integrated nutrient management issues, both strategic and applied research are required on interacting soil-plant-water-nutrient-climate processes. Long-term sustainability is one of the parameters that must be considered in evaluating the desirability of alternative rice technologies.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Plant and soil 100 (1987), S. 47-69 
    ISSN: 1573-5036
    Keywords: Ammonia volatilization ; Denitrification ; Nitrogen ; Rice
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
    Notes: Summary Inappropriate method and timing of N fertilizer application was found to result in 50–60% N losses. Recent nitrogen transformation studies indicate that NH3 volatilization in lowland rice soils is an important loss mechanism, causing a 5–47% loss of applied fertilizer under field conditions. Estimated denitrification losses were between 28 and 33%. Ammonia volatilization losses from lowland rice can be controlled by i) placement of fertilizer in the reduced layer and proper timing of application, ii) using phenylphosphorodiamidate (PPD) to delay urease activity in flooded soils, and iii) using algicides to help stabilize changes in floodwater pH. Appropriate fertilizer placement and timing is probably the most effective technique in controlling denitrification at the farm level. The effectivity of nitrification inhibitors as another method is still being evaluated. With 60–80% of N absorbed by the crop derived from the native N pool, substantial yield gains in lowland rice are highly possible with resources already in the land. Extensive studies on soil N and its management, and an understanding of soil N dynamics will greatly facilitate the decrease in immobilization and ammonium fixation in the soil and the increase in N availability to the rice crop. Critical research needs include greater emphasis on N transformation processes in rainfed lowland rice which is grown under more harsh and variable environmental regimes than irrigated lowland rice.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...