Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ; Coloanal anastomosis ; Anorectal manometry
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract This article examines the effect of ileal pouch-anal (n=134) and coloanal (n=16) anastomoses on resting anal canal pressures in 150 patients. METHODS: Patients underwent anal manometry before ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) and coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and again six weeks after ileostomy closure following these procedures. A water-perfused catheter system with four radial ports was used for manometry, pressures being recorded during both station and continuous pull through. RESULTS: Patients with IPAA were younger than those with CAA (34 years vs. 50 years) and had a different ratio of hand-to-stapled anastomosis (1∶2.6 vs. 1.3∶1). All CAA patients had had rectal cancer while IPAA patients suffered mainly from ulcerative colitis (n=114) or familial polyposis (n=10). The mean preoperative resting pressure for all patients was 79 mmHg (75–87, 95 percent confidence limit) and the mean fall in this pressure after surgery was 25 mmHg (−21 to −29, 95 percent confidence limit). There was no difference in preoperative pressure or fall between handsewn and stapled anastomoses, or between IPAA and CAA. CONCLUSION: There was a significant relationship between preoperative pressure and change in pressure that held true for all subgroups (change=−0.7 × preoperative pressure + 31,r=0.69). Analysis of the functional results confirmed that patients with high preoperative pressure are at risk for severe falls after surgery and are not guaranteed a good result. Conversely, patients with low preoperative pressures may actually have an increase with surgery and are not always incontinent. Patients with low preoperative anal resting pressures should not be denied anastomosis to the anus if they are continent.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Propanidid ; Liposomen ; Propofol ; Hämodynamik ; Histamin ; Katecholamine ; Key words Propanidid ; Liposomes ; Propofol ; Haemodynamics ; Histamine ; Catecholamines
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract Background. Propanidid was widely used as a short-acting i.v. anaesthetic until it was withdrawn due to severe haemodynamic side effects. It was presumed that anaphylactoid reactions with massive histamine release were caused by the solvent cremophor rather than by propanidid itself. A new liposomal preparation of propanidid was examined in this animal study and compared with propanidid in cremophor solution and with propofol. Methods. Eighteen pigs were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Group 1 (n=6): Propanidid in liposomal preparation (PropaLip; Braun Melsungen, Germany). Anaesthesia was induced with 60 mg/kg, followed by continuous infusion of 400 mg/kg·h. Group 2 (n=6): Propanidid in cremophor solution (PropaCrem; Sombrevin, Gedeon Richter, Budapest) 15 mg/kg, 100 mg/kg·h. Group 3 (n=6): Propofol (Disoprivan, Zeneca, Plankstadt, Germany) 5 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg·h. After induction and tracheal intubation, the animals were ventilated with 50% oxygen in air. Basic monitoring included noninvasive blood pressure measurements, electrocardiographic monitoring, and capnography. In a short surgical procedure, arterial and pulmonary artery catheters were placed via the right carotid artery and right internal jugular vein, respectively. As soon as the animals responded to a pain stimulus a second anaesthetic induction was performed, followed by a 60-min continuous infusion of the agent studied with invasive haemodynamic monitoring including arterial and pulmonary arterial pressures and cardiac output. Blood samples were taken for the measurement of serum levels of adrenaline, noradrenaline, cortisol, aldosterone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, and histamine. Results. Intubation conditions and quality of anaesthesia were best in propofol animals, followed by PropaCrem animals. In spite of the large dose of 410 mg/kg·h, resulting in a volume load of as much as 16.4 ml/kg·h, the PropaLip animals showed evidence of poor anaesthetic quality. In group 1 we recorded the highest increases in heart rate (91 vs. 115/min), cardiac output (5.4 vs. 7.7 l/min), plasma catecholamine levels, and histamine concentrations (124–268 ng/ml). Conclusions. In our animal study, propanidid in liposomal preparation failed to show promise as a new anaesthetic agent. Our results are discussed in view of a drug targeting the cells of the reticuloendothelial system, especially the liver, where liposomes are eliminated from the blood. This may result in the transport of propanidid to one of its major places of inactivation.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung In einer tierexperimentellen Studie wurden 18 Läuferschweine untersucht, von denen je 6 Tiere (1) Propanidid in Liposomendispersion (abgekürzt PropaLip), (2) Propanidid in Cremophor (abgekürzt PropaCrem) und (3) Propofol erhielten. Nach Narkoseeinleitung mit 60 mg/kg PropaLip, 15 mg/kg PropaCrem bzw. 5 mg/kg Propofol wurden die Tiere intubiert, für die weiteren Messungen instrumentiert und in einer anschließenden 60minütigen Narkose untersucht. Der Anästhetikaverbrauch betrug 16 mg/kg·h Propofol, 120 mg/kg·h PropaCrem und 410 mg/kg·h PropaLip. Trotz dieser hohen Dosierung und der damit verbundenen Volumenbelastung von 16,4 ml/kg·h war die Anästhesiequalität in der PropaLip-Gruppe unbefriedigend. Bei diesen Tieren traten die ausgeprägtesten Anstiege von Herzfrequenz, HZV, Katecholamin- und Histaminspiegeln auf, weitgehend konstant blieben die genannten Parameter bei der Propofolgruppe, während die PropaCrem-Tiere eine Mittelstellung einnahmen. Offenbar ist die Verfügbarkeit von Propanidid in der Liposomenpräparation schlechter als in der Cremophorlösung. Ein Zusammenhang der geringen Wirksamkeit mit der gezielten Aufnahme von Liposomen in die Zellen des RES, z.B. der Leber, wo Propanidid inaktiviert wird, wird diskutiert.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...