Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Blood culture Central venous catheter Bacterial colonisation Bacteraemia  (1)
  • Steady-state clearance  (1)
Material
Years
Keywords
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Intensive care medicine 24 (1998), S. 1217-1220 
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Key words Dopamine ; Steady-state clearance ; Renal
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective: To examine the validity of the low-dose “renal” dopamine regimen in critically ill patients by investigating the steady-state clearance of dopamine. Design: A prospective clinical study. Setting: Teaching hospital intensive care unit. Patients: 48 haemodynamically stable patients receiving a dopamine infusion. Interventions: Sampling of arterial blood and dopamine infusates. Measurement and results: Plasma and infusate dopamine levels were measured by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Steady-state clearance was determined by dividing the actual infusion rate by the steady-state plasma concentration. Dopamine clearance for the whole group was 46.4 ± 35.9 ml/kg per min (mean ± SD), which is significantly lower than 70 ± 15.2 ml/kg per min reported for elective surgical patients (p = 0.01). Twelve patients with renal dysfunction had significantly lower dopamine clearances (36 ± 16.6 ml/kg per min) than the remaining 36 patients (61 ± 38.5 ml/kg per min, p = 0.022). There was a very poor correlation between plasma dopamine level and infusion rate for the group as a whole (r = 0.47), and this worsened (r = 0.31)when only those patients on a “renal” dose of 2–5 μg/kg per min were considered (n = 30). Conclusion: Plasma dopamine clearance is lower in critically ill patients and there is a large interindividual variation. It is therefore impossible to predict the plasma level from the infusion rate. Consequently, the concept of a selective renovascular low-dose dopamine infusion is invalid in critically ill patients.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Intensive care medicine 26 (2000), S. 1373-1375 
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Blood culture Central venous catheter Bacterial colonisation Bacteraemia
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract. Objective: To evaluate the widespread practice of using qualitative culture of venous blood taken through central venous catheters (CVCs) as a means of diagnosing catheter colonisation in situ. Design: A prospective clinical study. Patients: Three hundred fifty-one CVCs were inserted into 228 critically ill patients. Interventions: Prior to CVC removal, blood was taken for qualitative culture from the CVC and a peripheral site. All catheter tips underwent semi-quantitative analysis of bacterial colony count [1]. Measurements and results: One hundred eighteen (33.6%) CVCs were found to be colonised on removal. A positive central blood culture had a sensitivity and specificity of 50.8% and 78.9% when compared with the 'gold standard' of catheter tip culture. This gives a positive predictive value of 47.7% and a negative predictive value of 76.5%. The sensitivity and specificity of a positive peripheral blood culture were 41.5% and 77.7% with positive and negative predictive values of 48.8% and 72.9%, respectively. When only those catheters removed because of systemic sepsis (n=139) were considered, a positive central blood culture had a sensitivity of 58.8% and a specificity of 69.3%. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the use of central blood culture confers a small advantage in sensitivity compared with peripheral blood culture. This advantage was further improved by only considering the catheters removed because of systemic sepsis but at the cost of a loss of specificity. Qualitative blood culture is a poor tool for the diagnosis of in-situ CVC colonisation.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...