Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1530-0358
    Keywords: Outcome ; Major pelvic surgery ; Rectal cancer ; Elderly patients
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract PURPOSE: Because the elderly population in Western countries is rapidly increasing, as is their life expectancy, studies aimed at determining the impact of major surgery for primary rectal cancer in this group are warranted. The purpose of this study was to compare perioperative morbidity and mortality and long-term disease-specific and overall survival in primary rectal cancer patients, older and younger than 75 years of age, subject to major pelvic surgery. METHODS: From September 1986 to December 1996, the Prospective Colorectal Service Database identified 1,120 consecutive patients who underwent major pelvic surgery for primary rectal cancer. Of these, 157 (15 percent) were 75 years of age or older and comprise the elderly group. From the remaining 963 patients younger than 75 years of age, a representative random sample of 174 was selected and constitutes the younger group. Data were obtained from computerized databases and confirmed via chart review and telephone interviews. RESULTS: Perioperative complications were observed in 53 (34 percent) elderly and 63 (36 percent;P=not significant) younger patients. Perioperative deaths occurred in two (1.3 percent) elderly and one (0.6 percent;P=not significant) younger patient. The median follow-up time was 48 months. Although the overall survival was lower in the elderly group (P=0.02; the 5-year overall survival rates were 51 and 66 percent), the disease-specific survival rate was similar in the two groups (P=0.75; the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 69 and 71 percent). CONCLUSION: In select individuals 75 years of age or older, major pelvic surgery for primary rectal cancer can be done with perioperative morbidity and mortality rates comparable to those obtained in younger individuals, while achieving excellent disease-specific and overall long-term survival.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-2649
    Keywords: Symptoms ; Quality of life ; Cancer ; Colon cancer ; Ovarian cancer ; Prostate cancer ; Breast cancer
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Despite the importance of symptom control in the cancer population, few studies have systematically assessed the prevalence and characteristics of symptoms or the interactions between various symptom characteristics and other factors related to quality of life (QOL). As part of a validation study of a new symptom assessment instrument, inpatients and out-patients with prostate, colon, breast or ovarian cancer were evaluated using the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale and other measures of psychological condition, performance status, symptom distress and overall quality of life. The mean age of the 243 avaluable patients was 55.5 years (range 23–86 years); over 60% were women and almost two-thirds had metastatic disease. The Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score was≤80 in 49.8% and 123 were inpatients at the time of assessment. Across tumour types, 40–80% experienced lack of energy, pain, feeling drowsy, dry mouth, insomnia, or symptoms indicative of psychological distress. Although symptom characteristics were variable, the proportion of patients who described a symptom as relatively intense or frequent always exceeded the proportion who reported it as highly distressing. The mean (±SD, range) number of symptoms per patient was 11.5±6.0 (0–25); inpatients had more symptoms than outpatients (13.5±5.4 vs. 9.7±6.0, p〈0.002) and those with KPS≤80 had more symptoms than those with KPS〉80 (14.8±5.5 vs. 9.2±4.9, p〈0.0001). The number of symptoms was highly associated with heightened psychological distress and poorer quality of life (for example, r=0.67 for the relationship with the Functional Living Index-Cancer, a QOL measure). These data clarify the prevalence and characteristics of cancer-related symptoms and suggest that the number of symptoms per patient may be a useful quality of life indicator.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...