Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Key words Procalcitonin ; APACHE-II score ; C-reactive protein ; SIRS ; Sepsis ; Severe sepsis ; septic shock
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective: To determine the value of procalcitonin (PCT) in the early diagnosis (and differentiation) of patients with SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock in comparison to C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell and thrombocyte count, and APACHE-II score (AP-II).¶Design: Prospective cohort study including all consecutive patients admitted to the ICU with the suspected diagnosis of infection over a 7-month period.¶Patients and methods: A total of 185 patients were included: 17 patients with SIRS, 61 with sepsis, 68 with severe sepsis, and 39 patients with septic shock. CRP, cell counts, AP-II and PCT were evaluated on the first day after onset of inflammatory symptoms.¶Results: PCT values were highest in patients with septic shock (12.89 ± 4.39 ng/ml; P 〈 0.05 vs patients with severe sepsis). Patients with severe sepsis had significantly higher PCT levels than patients with sepsis or SIRS (6.91 ± 3.87 ng/ml vs 0.53 ± 2.9 ng/ml; P 〈 0.001, and 0.41 ± 3.04 ng/ml; P 〈 0.001, respectively). AP-II scores did not differ significantly between sepsis, severe sepsis and SIRS (19.26 ± 1.62, 16.09 ± 2.06, and 17.42 ± 1.72 points, respectively), but was significantly higher in patients with septic shock (29.27 ± 1.35, P 〈 0.001 vs patients with severe sepsis). Neither CRP, cell counts, nor the degree of fever showed significant differences between sepsis and severe sepsis, whereas white blood cell count and platelet count differed significantly between severe sepsis and septic shock.¶Conclusions: In contrast to AP-II, PCT appears to be a useful early marker to discriminate between sepsis and severe sepsis.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-2277
    Keywords: Key words Kidney transplantation ; Ureteral complications ; Pyeloureterostomy
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Necrosis and stenosis of the ureter are severe complications after kidney transplantation and occur with mean incidence of 2,9–13,4 %. Several surgical techniques like simple nephrostomy or complex urinary tract reconstruction have been applied for repair. In this study, our experience with native pyeloureterostomy (NPUS) using the native ureter is presented. Between March 1978 and June 1996, 2592 kidney transplantations were performed in our institution. In 48 patients (1,9 %), secondary urinary tract reconstruction by NPUS was necessary. These patients were evaluated retrospectively by review of the case notes. At the time of operation the mean age was 45 ± 14 years. Indications for NPUS were distal ureteral stenosis (n = 29), necrosis (n = 17), bleeding (n = 1) or iatrogenic lesion of the ureter (n = 1). The mean time period between transplantation and urinary tract reconstruction was 20 ± 23 days (range: 1–90 days) for necrosis and 404 ± 637 days (range: 14–2385 days) for stenosis. A pyeloureterostomy was technically feasible in all patients using the recipient's ipsilateral ureter. In 40 out of 48 patients the graft developed a normal function postoperatively (follow up: 39 ± 48 months). A graft nephrectomy was necessary only in one patient, because of complete pyelonnecrosis 6 days after NPUS. Two grafts were lost due to acute rejection. Data of five patients were not available 〉 15 years after successful reconstruction. We can conclude that NPUS is a safe and simple rescue technique for the treatment of distal ureteral complications after kidney transplantation. Therefore, this technique should be the therapy of choice when secondary reconstruction by re-ureteroneocystostomy is not possible.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...