ISSN:
1279-8509
Keywords:
Acute myelogenous leukemia
;
Clinical trials
;
Bone-marrow transplantation
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Abstract Since the early 80s, the EORTC Leukemia Group has included 3947 patients in 8 consecutive phase III studies on acute myelogenous leukemia, with stratification according to the age groups. Some of these patients were included by other cooperative groups (GIMEMA, HOVON), within intergroup studies. The main hypotheses tested by randomization were intensive chemotherapy consolidation, allogeneic and autologous bone marrow transplantation in the younger patients. In patients aged 60 years or more, a wait and see policy followed by a palliative chemotherapy was compared to an immediate conventional induction treatment, mitoxantrone was compared to daunorubicin, and, during remission, a low dose Ara-C maintenance treatment to no maintenance. The main results can be summarized as follows: Allogeneic BMT, and, relatively, autologous BMT do better than intensive chemotherapy consolidation with regards to the disease-free survival, but not for the overall survival after remission. In the elderly, an immediate induction and a low-dose Ara-C maintenance treatment are preferable to the other options tested. Mainly in patients aged more than 45, the supplementary toxicity of more intensive chemotherapy consolidation, with high dose Ara-C, counter balanced the increased anti-leukemic effect. Finally the trials randomizing GM-CSF during induction yielded disappointing results. The EORTC LCG is currently studying the relative value of various intercalating agents during induction, and of the G-CSF as well, and, during remission the autologous peripheral stem cells compared to bone marrow transplantation.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00282-996-0247-x
Permalink
