Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Conditioned reward  (1)
  • Environment-specific conditioning  (1)
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Psychopharmacology 92 (1987), S. 365-370 
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: (+)-Amphetamine ; Caffeine ; Environment-specific conditioning ; Dopamine
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Animals with a history of receiving psychomotor stimulants in a specific environment show enhanced activity when injected with saline and placed there. In the present study, a Pavlovian paradigm was used to compare the unconditioned and conditioned activity effects of (+)-amphetamine (0.1, 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 mg/kg), caffeine (0.1, 1.0, 10.0, and 30.0 mg/kg), and a saline group (n's=6–12). Rats experienced conditioning days with either drug or saline injected IP prior to a 60-min session in the activity monitor and the alternate saline or drug injected in the home cage following the session. On test days, all animals received saline in the activity monitors. Results revealed that amphetamine produced environment-specific conditioning in a dose-dependent manner; previous experience with 0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 but not 0.1 mg/kg in the activity monitor resulted in conditioned activity. A caffeine dose of 10.0 mg/kg produced stimulant effects on conditioning days and previous experience with the 1.0, 10.0, or 30.0 mg/kg dose in the activity monitor led to conditioned activity on test days. However, on test days the control groups as well as the 30.0 mg/kg experimental group showed significantly reduced activity as compared to the saline group. Thus, it appeared that caffeine produced hypoactivity 23 h after injection. Amphetamine produced conditioning in a dose-dependent manner, and the appearance of significant unconditioned activity during conditioning sessions was not necessary or sufficient to produce a conditioned effect. For caffeine there was some evidence of environment-specific conditioning, but it appears that between-group differences for caffeine may be accounted for by hypoactivity 23 h following injection.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Psychopharmacology 118 (1995), S. 437-443 
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: Bromocriptine ; Conditioned reward ; D1 receptors ; D2 receptors ; Dopamine ; Reinforcement ; Reward ; SCH 23390
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract It has been suggested that reward-related learning may require intact functioning at the dopamine D1 receptor. The present experiment tested this hypothesis by challenging the reward-enhancing effects of the D2 agonist, bromocriptine, with a D1 antagonist, SCH 23390. For comparison, the effects of the D2 antagonist, pimozide, were also evaluated. Male rats (n=240) were pre-exposed to a chamber with two levers, one producing a 3-s lights-off stimulus and the other a 3-s tone stimulus. Four conditioning sessions followed, during which levers were absent and presentations of the lights-off stimulus were paired with food. Testing consisted of comparing presses on each lever after conditioning to before conditioning for each rat. Control groups showed a significantly greater increase in responding for lights-off than tone, indicating that the lights-off stimulus had become a conditioned reward. Results showed that bromocriptine (0.25–10.0 mg/kg, IP, 60 min before test session) enhanced responding at doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg significantly more on the conditioned reward lever than on the other lever. The lowest dose of SCH 23390 (1.0 µg/kg, SC, 2 h before testing) eliminated the bromocriptine-produced enhancement at 2.5 mg/kg and a significant enhancement was seen at 10.0 mg/kg. The higher doses of SCH 23390 (5.0 and 10.0 µg/kg) eliminated the bromocriptine effect and the conditioned reward effect itself, respectively. The low dose of pimozide (0.1 mg/kg, IP, 4 h before test session) eliminated the bromocriptine-produced enhancement at 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg and a significant enhancement was now seen at 10.0 mg/kg; the higher dose (0.2 mg/kg) appeared to block the conditioned reward effect itself. These results suggest that both SCH 23390 and pimozide interfered with the reward-enhancing effects of bromocriptine. Thus, the present results suggest that reward-related learning can be enhanced through D2 receptor stimulation with bromocriptine and that this effect appears to depend on intact D1 receptor function.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...