Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Incidence  (1)
  • Key words: Exercise — Bone — Turnover — Ultrasound — Military.  (1)
  • Key words: Matched case–control study – Osteoporosis  (1)
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0827
    Keywords: Key words: Exercise — Bone — Turnover — Ultrasound — Military.
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine , Physics
    Notes: Abstract. To measure the physiological changes in bone in response to strenuous exercise we performed a prospective study of male army recruits over 10 weeks of basic training. Measurements performed at the start and completion of training consisted of ultrasound (US) measurements of the heel: velocity of sound (VOS in m/seconds) and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA in dB/MHz) and bone turnover markers; osteocalcin (OC), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP). Forty subjects were recruited for the study and 26 completed training. Over the 10-week study period there was a significant 1.7% fall in mean VOS [mean paired difference (mpd) 27.2 m/second, SEM 9.5 (95% CI 7.5–46.8) P= 0.009] and a nonsignificant 3.4% increase in BUA (P= 0.159). There were significant falls in markers of bone formation OC [11.6%, mpd 0.11 μg/liter (95% CI 0.07–0.14) P 〈 0.001] and BALP [13.3%, mpd 3.49 U/liter (CI 0.80–6.18) P= 0.013] and a nonsignificant 9.5% fall in TRAP a marker of bone resorption. The 10 recruits subsequently injured had a significantly lower VOS on entry [mean difference 24.2 m/seconds (95% CI 4.6–43.7) P= 0.017] and nonsignificantly raised BUA and baseline levels of all bone markers. The ultrasound changes may be accounted for by increase in trabecular separation and a fall in trabecular connectivity due to microfracture. The decrease in bone markers implies a fall in bone turnover.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Keywords: Incidence ; Morphometry ; Prevalence ; Sensitivity ; Specificity ; Vertebral fracture
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The absence of specific criteria for the definition of vertebral fracture has major implications for assessing the apparent prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformity. Also, little is known of the effect of using different criteria for new vertebral fractures in clinical studies. We therefore developed radiological criteria for vertebral fracture in women for assessing both the prevalence and the incidence of vertebral osteoporosis in population and in prospective studies and compared these with several other published methods. Normal ranges for vertebral shape were obtained from radiographs in 100 women aged 45–50 years. These included ranges for the ratios of anterior/posterior, central/posterior and posterior/predicted posterior vertebral heights from T4 to L5. The predicted posterior height was calculated from adjacent vertebrae. In contrast to other methods, our definition of fracture required the fulfilment of two criteria at each vertebral site, and was associated with a lower apparent prevalence of fracture in the control women due to a lower false positive rate. The prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformity using different criteria were then compared in a series of women with skeletal metastases from breast cancer in whom radiographs were obtained 6 months apart. The prevalence of vertebral deformity and the specificity for deformity varied markedly with differing criteria. Using a cut-off of 3 standard deviations the prevalence of vertebral deformity in the women with breast cancer was 46%. Using other methods, the prevalences of deformity ranged from 33% to 74%. Over a 6-month interval 25% of patients with breast cancer sustained 61 deformities using our method, of which only 8% resulted from errors in reproducibility. The number of patients sustaining new deformities was increased twofold when assessed by other methods (45%–53%), but errors of reproducibility may have accounted for 21% of the new deformities. The magnitude and distribution of these errors have important implications for the apparent therapeutic efficacy of agents in clinical trials of osteoporosis. The rapid semi-automated technique for assessing vertebral deformities on lateral spine radiographs that we have developed has a high specificity, and reduces the impact of errors of reproducibility on estimates of prevalence and incidence. The method should prove a value in assessing vertebral deformity both in population studies and in prospective clinical trials.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1433-2965
    Keywords: Key words: Matched case–control study – Osteoporosis
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract: There is controversy about the ideal timing of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and duration of treatment. In this study we have examined intrapair differences in bone mineral density (BMD) in twins who were discordant for HRT use. Twin pairs in which only one co-twin had been exposed to HRT for more than 12 months continuously were selected from 365 postmenopausal monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) pairs recruited as part of the St Thomas’ Adult UK Twin Registry of normal volunteers. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Intrapair differences in BMD between HRT users and non-users were compared. A total of 65 HRT-discordant pairs were identified, of which 36 were discordant for current HRT use (mean age: 55.3 years, median duration of HRT use: 36 months) and 29 were discordant for past HRT use (mean age: 60.4 years, median HRT duration: 30 months). Among current users BMD was consistently and significantly higher than in non-users at both sites (lumbar spine mean intrapair difference (IPD%): 12.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.1%, 17.5%; femoral neck IPD%: 8.6%, 95% CI: 3.4%, 13.7%). The intrapair differences were substantially smaller when past users and non-users were compared (lumbar spine IPD%: 2.4%, 95% CI: −3.7%, 8.6%; femoral neck IPD%: 0.4%, 95% CI: −5.3%, 6.0%). These differences remained little changed after adjusting for the potential confounding effects of the duration of HRT use, and intrapair differences in alcohol and tobacco consumption and physical exercise. The results confirm, in a closely matched design, the findings of other observational research that current use of HRT has a major effect on BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Past users of HRT do not, however, show the same benefits. The clinical implications of these findings are that HRT needs to be used continuously to influence BMD and that alternative treatments need to be considered in those who discontinue HRT.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...