Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Interior method  (1)
  • Modified pruning technique  (1)
  • Potential function  (1)
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Algorithmica 4 (1989), S. 77-96 
    ISSN: 1432-0541
    Keywords: Computational geometry ; Modified pruning technique ; LinearL 1 approximation
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Computer Science , Mathematics
    Notes: Abstract In this paper we present a linear-time algorithm for approximating a set ofn points by a linear function, or a line, that minimizes theL 1 norm. The algorithmic complexity of this problem appears not to have been investigated, although anO(n 3) naive algorithm can be easily obtained based on some simple characteristics of an optimumL 1 solution. Our linear-time algorithm is optimal within a constant factor and enables us to use linearL 1 approximation of many points in practice. The complexity ofL 1 linear approximation of a piecewise linear function is also touched upon.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Algorithmica 1 (1986), S. 455-482 
    ISSN: 1432-0541
    Keywords: Linear programming ; Interior method ; Barrier function ; Newton method
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Computer Science , Mathematics
    Notes: Abstract A simple Newton-like descent algorithm for linear programming is proposed together with results of preliminary computational experiments on small- and medium-size problems. The proposed algorithm gives local superlinear convergence to the optimum and, experimentally, shows global linear convergence. It is similar to Karmarkar's algorithm in that it is an interior feasible direction method and self-correcting, while it is quite different from Karmarkar's in that it gives superlinear convergence and that no artificial extra constraint is introduced nor is protective geometry needed, but only affine geometry suffices.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Mathematical programming 40 (1988), S. 29-32 
    ISSN: 1436-4646
    Keywords: Potential function ; multiplicative penalty function ; convexity
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Computer Science , Mathematics
    Notes: Abstract Karmarkar's potential function is quasi-convex, but not convex. This note investigates the multiplicative version of the potential function, and shows that it is not necessarily convex in general, but is strictly convex when the corresponding feasible region is bounded. This implies that the multiplicative version of the potential function in Karmarkar's algorithm is convex, since it works on a simplex.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...