Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0843
    Keywords: Key words Ifosfamide enantiomers ; N-Dechloroethylation ; Metabolism ; Enantioselective pharmacokinetics
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  The pharmacokinetics of the R and S enantiomers of ifosfamide (IFF) and of its 2- and 3-N-dechloroethylated metabolites (2-DCE-IFF and 3-DCE-IFF) were investigated in 14 cancer patients treated with a 3-h infusion of (R,S)-IFF (3 g/m2) with mesna uroprotection. An enantioselective gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric (GC-MS) assay was used to determine the concentrations in plasma and urine. The AUCs of (R)-IFF were significantly larger than those of (S)-IFF (2480±200 vs 1960±150 μM . h). The terminal half-lives (7.57±0.99 h) and mean residence times (11.17±1.10 h) of (R)-IFF were significantly longer than those of (S)-IFF, 6.03±0.82 h and 9.37±0.88 h, respectively. The mean volume of distribution at steady state of (R)-IFF (25.68±0.80 l/m2) was slightly smaller than that of (S)-IFF (27.35±0.89 l/m2). While the renal clearances of (R)-IFF and (S)-IFF were similar, the nonrenal clearance was significantly lower for (R)-IFF (30.20±2.70 vs 41.40±3.55 ml/m2 per min) as was total clearance (41.52±2.90 vs 52.37±3.75 ml/m2 per min). The AUC values for all of the DCE metabolites from (S)-IFF were significantly greater than those from (R)-IFF with 47% of the measured AUC accounted for by DCE from (S)-IFF compared to only 20% for (R)-IFF. Therefore, the enantioselective difference in IFF elimination can be partially explained by differences in N-dechloroethylation.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...