Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of nuclear medicine 17 (1990), S. 94-95 
    ISSN: 1619-7089
    Keywords: Uterine radiation dose ; Sodium iodide 131 ; Underestimation
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The evaluation of the risk of radiation damage to the unborn child as the result of the administration of radionuclides remains a subject for discussion (Mountford 1989). Lack of information concerning the biodistribution of radiopharmaceuticals in the early stages of pregnancy, before organogenesis has occurred, has greatly restricted the objective assessment of fetal doses. Recent observations on the biodistribution of a therapeutic dose of sodium iodide 131 in a patient with an unsuspected early pregnancy lead us to suspect that current dose estimates with respect to uterine exposure (ARSAC 1988) may seriously underestimate the actual exposure of the developing fetus.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-7217
    Keywords: buserelin ; LHRH-agonists ; rat mammary tumor ; sandostatin ; somatostatin analogs
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary The effects of treatment with a somatostatin analog (Sandostatin, SMS201-995) were investigated in female rats with dimethylbenzanthracene(DMBA)-induced rat mammary tumors. A 3-week treatment was performed using sandostatin, the LHRH-agonist buserelin alone, or buserelin in combination with sandostatin. Twice daily sandostatin treatment was performed with dosages of 0.05 µg, 0.2 µg, 1 µg, 5 µg, and 20 µg. Buserelin was used in a 2 × 5 µg/day dosage. The combined results from six different experiments show that the various dosages of sandostatin caused no tumor growth inhibition. Somatostatin receptors could not be demonstrated in these mammary tumors. Sandostatin treatment by daily injections did not suppress levels of growth hormone, prolactin, or epidermal growth factor-like activities. Estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor contents of the mammary tumors were not changed. In contrast, buserelin treatment caused highly significant tumor remission. The combined treatment with sandostatin and buserelin did not alter the treatment results obtained after treatment with buserelin alone. In conclusion, sandostatin treatment in this tumor model had no direct growth inhibitory effect and did not cause an endocrine inhibition of mammary tumor growth. However, these results do not exclude antitumor effects in human breast cancer in view of the presence of somatostatin receptors in approximately 20–45% of human tumors, besides possible different endocrine effects.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...