Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Psychopharmacology 68 (1980), S. 77-83 
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: l-DOPA ; Supersensitivity ; Subsensitivity ; Dopamine ; Locomotor activity
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Mice, pretreated orally with l-DOPA (200 mg/kg) plus benserazide (50 mg/kg) (l-DOPA-B) responded when challenged 24h later with the same drug combination, with significantly greater locomotor stimulation than animals pretreated with the vehicle. The enhanced response was not due to an intrinsic effect of benserazide. Nor was it dependent on a change in central dopamine (DA) receptor sensitivity, because the two pretreatment groups (l-DOPA-B and vehicle) did not differ in their locomotor response to a range of apomorphine doses (300–3,000 μg/kg, IP). The enhanced response was, however, due to DA receptor stimulation because it was antagonised by premedication of the mice with haloperidol or pimozide. Moreover, the enhanced response to l-DOPA-B challenge was also produced when mice were pretreated (24h earlier) with a high dose of l-DOPA alone (without benserazide) (1,200 mg/kg, orally). Animals which had been pretreated with l-DOPA-B had significantly higher brain levels of l-DOPA and DA after a subsequent challenge dose of l-DOPA-B administered 24h later. Thus the enhanced response to l-DOPA-B observed in the present experiment appears to be dependent on some mechanism which produces higher concentrations of l-DOPA (and consequently DA) in the brain.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: Amphetamine ; Apomorphine ; Chronic treatment ; Dopamine ; Locomotor activity ; Noradrenaline ; Supersensitive receptors
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Mice administered dexamphetamine (4 mg/kg i.p.) once daily for 20 days displayed an enhanced locomotor response (compared to that of vehicletreated mice) to dexamphetamine when challenged 4 to 16 days but not when challenged 32 days after withdrawal. In the experiments described a 20-day dexamphetamine administration followed by an 8-day withdrawal period was used. Pimozide or haloperidol not only completely antagonised the enhanced response to dexamphetamine (2 mg/kg i.p.) in dexamphetamine-treated mice, but also antagonised all dexamphetamine-induced stimulation. Reserpine, in contrast, preferentially blocked the difference in the response to dexamphetamine of dexamphetamine-and vehicle-treated mice, without antagonising all the dexamphetamine-induced locomotion. The stimulation produced in dexamphetamine-(but not in vehicle-) treated mice by dexamphetamine was partially blocked by phentolamine, phenoxybenzamine, and propranolol. FLA-63 did not significantly influence the response to dexamphetamine in either group. That a dopaminergic mechanism plays a major role in the enhanced response to dexamphetamine was shown by the significantly greater response in dexamphetamine-treated mice to apomorphine challenge. The treatment of mice with apomorphine (10 mg/kg/day i.p. for 20 days), produced a greater response to apomorphine challenge in the apomorphine-treated mice than in vehicle-treated mice 8 days after withdrawal. The data show that with long-term administration both dexamphetamine and apomorphine are able to produce in mice what appear to be supersensitive dopamine receptors. Moreover, the enhanced response to dexamphetamine after withdrawal from long-term dexamphetamine treatment appears to require the presence of reserpine-sensitive amine stores and, to a lesser extent, the presence of unblocked α-adrenergic receptors.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-1912
    Keywords: D-1 Receptor ; D-2 Receptor ; Locomotor activity ; Supersensitivity ; Reserpine
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary With the advent of selective dopamine D-1 and D-2 agonists such as SKF38393 (2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-7,8-dihydroxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine HCl) and quinpirole (LY171555, trans-4,4a,5,6,7,8a,9-octahydro-5-propyl-2H-pyrazolo [3,4-g]-quinoline), it has become possible to examine the functional role of the two dopamine receptor subtypes as well as their interrelationship. In the present study, we pretreated mice with the granule-depleting agent reserpine (5 mg/kg sc) and tested the mice from 4 h to 10 days later. In all the studies, each mouse also received an injection of the dopamine synthesis inhibitor alpha methyl-p-tyrosine (200 mg/kg ip) 1 h before agonist challenge. Where the reserpine was given 2 or more days before testing, a second dose of reserpine was given 4 h before agonist challenge. While producing no significant locomotor stimulation 4 h after reserpine, SKF38393 produced a dose-dependent increase in coordinated locomotion 24 h and 3 days after the reserpine. Likewise, quinpirole itself produced no significant alteration in activity at 4 h, but significantly increased activity at 24 h and 3 days. The new selective D-1 agonist CY208-243 ((−)-4,6,6a,7,8,12b-hexahydro-7-methyl-indolo [4,3-ab] phenanthridine), unlike SKF38393, produced some increase in activity 4 h after reserpine, but much greater activity was seen 1 and 3 days after reserpine. The enhancement with SKF38393, CY208-243 and quinpirole was most marked 3 days after the reserpine. The behavioural stimulation produced by the mixed D-1/D-2 agonist apomorphine was also greater 3 days after reserpine pretreatment than after 4 h. The combination of SKF38393 and quinpirole produced greater locomotor stimulation than either drug alone, and the increased response, while evident 4 h after reserpine, was most marked 3 days after, and had essentially disappeared by 10 days. A similar interaction was seen between CY208243 and quinpirole. At 3 days, there was also a supersensitive response of the mice to the rearing and sniffing produced by SKF38393 plus quinpirole. Striatal binding studies with the D-1 selective ligand [3H]-SCH23390 (R-(+)-8-chloro-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine-7ol) and with the D-2 selective ligand [3H]-spiperone indicated that there were no changes in K d or B max of the D-1 or D-2 receptors at the time of maximum behavioural supersensitivity (3 days). Thus, the behavioural supersensitivity to apomorphine, SKF38393, CY208-243 and to quinpirole was not accompanied by any change in D-1 or D-2 binding in the striatum indicating that the biochemical modulation of the supersensitivity is either outside the striatum and/or associated with neurochemical alterations in the striatum other than changes in the D-1 and D-2 recognition sites.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Psychopharmacology 83 (1984), S. 70-75 
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: Dopamine ; Locomotor activity ; Nucleus accumbens ; Passive avoidance ; State-dependent learning ; Rat
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The acquisition of a one-trial step-through passive avoidance task was examined in rats following the administration of nialamide IP and dopamine (DA) or saline into the nucleus accumbens. DA-treated rats displayed impaired learning of the task as evidenced by their lower step-through latencies on a retest trial 7 days later. The specificity of this impairment was studied in a 2×2 design involving intracerebral injections prior to both training and testing trials. It was found that DA treatment prior to the training trial disrupted learning or memorization of the task but that DA did not affect performance or retrieval and did not induce state-dependent learning. These findings suggest that DA applied to the nucleus accumbens does not facilitate learning per se.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...