Library

X
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Activity and toxicity of GI147211 in breast, colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancer patients: An EORTC–ECSG phase II clinical study (2000)
    Springer
    Annals of oncology 11 (2000), S. 793-797 
    Details
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: breast cancer ; camptothecins ; colorectal cancer ; GI147211 ; non-small-cell lung cancer ; topoisomerase I
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background:GI147211 is a water-soluble synthetic analogue ofcamptothecin showing promising in vivoand in vitroantitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile. Patients and methods:Between April 1995 and November 1996, 67eligible patients with pretreated breast cancer (25 patients) andchemo-naïve colorectal (19 patients) and non-small-cell lung cancer (23patients) were entered into three multicentric, non-randomized phase IItrials. Treatment schedule consisted of intravenous GI147211 administered ata dose of 1.2 mg/m2/day for five consecutive days every threeweeks. Results:Hematological toxicity was common with grade 3–4neutropenia in 54% of patients and neutropenic fever together or notassociated with infection in 14.5% of patients. Grade 3–4thrombocytopenia and grade 2–4 anemia were observed in 20% andin 68% of patients, respectively. Non-hematological toxicity wasgenerally mild to moderate and consisted mainly of gastrointestinal toxicity,asthenia and alopecia. A dose-escalation to 1.5 mg/m2/d wasfeasible in 17 (25%) patients. The antitumor activity of GI147211 wasmoderate in breast cancer patients (3 partial responses (PRs), response rate(RR) 13%) and minimal in non-small cell lung cancer patients (2 PRs,RR 9%). No objective responses were obtained in colorectal patients. Conclusions:GI147211, at the dose and schedule employed in thisstudy, showed an acceptable safety profile but a modest antitumor activity inthe examined tumor types.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008373031714
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Vascular endothelial growth factor measured in platelet poor plasma allows optimal separation between cancer patients and volunteers: A key to study an angiogenic marker in vivo? (1999)
    Springer
    Annals of oncology 10 (1999), S. 965-971 
    Details
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: angiogenesis ; biological monitoring ; platelets ; vascular endothelial growth factor
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background: Serum VEGF levels are elevated in cancer patients and are used as a tumor marker in different malignancies. We have measured VEGF levels in different blood compartments in cancer patients and healthy volunteers in order to assess the most suitable way of processing blood for measuring VEGF as a marker of tumor-angiogenesis. Patients and methods: VEGF concentrations were analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in serum (VEGFS), EDTA plasma (VEGFEDTA), citrated plasma (VEGFC), CTAD-plasma (VEGFCTAD), platelet poor plasma (VEGFPPP), platelet rich plasma after induction of platelet activation (VEGFPRP). Platelet activation was assessed by measuring PF4 concentrations in different plasma samples. Results: We observed higher VEGFS (P = 0.0027), VEGFEDTA (P = 0.003) and VEGFPPP (P = 0.0007) levels in cancer patients than in volunteers; VEGFPRP concentrations showed no significant difference (P = 0.208). Analysis of the correlation between VEGFplt and VEGFS in cancer patients showed a similar correlation in a comparable VEGFS concentration range as in the volunteers. When comparing VEGFC to VEGFCTAD, we find significantly higher VEGF and PF4 levels in citrated plasma (VEGF: P = 0.00019; PF4: P = 0.00023). Conclusions: It is likely that VEGFS in cancer patients encompass platelet-delivered VEGF and VEGF from other sources, notably from (neo)-angiogenesis in tumoral tissue. The best discrimination between volunteers and cancer patients was observed in PPP. As generating plasma can induce platelet activation, with consequent VEGF release from platelets, we suggest that to assess free circulating VEGF, CTAD plasma should be used.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008377921886
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
    Paper (German National Licenses)
    Fulltext
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...