Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Digestive diseases and sciences 39 (1994), S. 1117-1125 
    ISSN: 1573-2568
    Keywords: esophagus ; manometry ; pH ; cough ; gastroesophageal reflux ; gastrohypopharyngeal reflux
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Fifteen consecutive patients referred because of suspicion that gastroesophageal reflux was the cause of their chronic, unexplained cough underwent combined ambulatory esophageal manometry and pH-metry in order to correlate cough episodes with gastroesophageal and gastrohypopharyngeal acid reflux. Cough episodes, which were recognized manometrically as phasic bursts of brief simultaneous elevations in all intraesophageal pressure leads, were markedly underreported by patients. If all cough events were considered, that is, single coughs plus “bursts” of coughing, patients reported on average 10% of the total manometrically recorded coughs, whereas if only cough bursts were considered, patients reported an average of 23%. Gastrohypopharyngeal acid reflux preceded 1% and 1.8%, whereas gastroesophageal reflux preceded 9% and 13%, of the total coughs and cough bursts, respectively. One percent and 1.6% of total coughs and cough bursts, respectively, appeared to precipitate reflux. Gastrohypopharyngeal reflux events were rare, with only 15 episodes recorded in nine of the 15 patients. In 13 asymptomatic volunteers, no episodes of gastrohypopharyngeal acid reflux were recorded. This study suggests that ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry provides an objective measure of temporal relationships between cough episodes and acid reflux events that is superior to relying on the patients' reporting of cough episodes. In this study population, the incidence of a direct temporal correlation between reflux and cough episodes was relatively low. However, a high proportion of patients had gastrohypopharyngeal reflux, suggesting that acid reflux to the laryngeal inlet may indirectly play a role in chronic unexplained cough.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Digestive diseases and sciences 36 (1991), S. 282-288 
    ISSN: 1573-2568
    Keywords: balloon distension ; atropine ; esophagus ; chest pain
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Intraesophageal balloon distension has been introduced recently as a provocative test in the assessment of patients with noncardiac chest pain. In order to examine the effect of balloon location and muscarinic blockade on distension-induced pain, 10 asymptomatic male volunteers were studied on two separate days using a low-compliance perfused manometry system that incorporated a silicone rubber balloon. Five-second-duration balloon distensions using balloon volumes of 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10 ml of air were performed with the balloon located both 16 cm (proximal site) and 6 cm (distal site) above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) before and after administration of atropine (10 μg/kg intravenously) or placebo in a randomized double-blind fashion. A standardized scoring system was used to assess the balloon distension-induced pain. Pain scores varied directly with balloon volume but were consistently higher with the balloon located at the proximal site versus the distal site. This was not associated with any differences in intraballoon pressures between the two sites; however, contraction amplitude orad to the balloon was greater with balloon distension at the proximal site. Atropine significantly decreased pain sensation scores with the balloon located distally but not proximally. This attenuation was not associated with significant changes in intraballoon pressures; howver, contractions orad to the balloon were markedly inhibited by atropine with distal but not with proximal distension. These studies indicate that balloon distension-induced pain varies depending on the location of distension. This difference is not explained by differences in esophageal wall tension at the site of distension. The observation that atropine decreases balloon distension-induced pain in the distal esophagus suggests that smooth muscle contraction at least partly contributes to pain sensation.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...