Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Annals of oncology 9 (1998), S. 133-138 
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: breast cancer ; clinical research ; molecular biology
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Clinical research for breast cancer is moving in three new directions following: 1) a critical analysis of three decades of randomized clinical trials for early disease; 2) increasing awareness of this lethal disease among women, generating women's associations which are pressing for improved breast cancer education, screening and treatment; 3) an exponential growth in our understanding of breast cancer molecular biology, leading to a number of innovative therapies with new targets in the cancer cell or its environment. It is the remarkable work of the Oxford Group which has finally vindicated the use of our three main weapons against breast cancer micro-metastases, namely tamoxifen, chemotherapy and ovarian ablation. There is now consensus that clinical research in the adjuvant setting may gain speed and efficiency through intergroup collaboration. Such an 'Intergroup' has been recently created in Europe and will collaborate with the American–Canadian Intergroup. Women's associations have only recently stepped forward to demand better care, and more effective therapies: they are becoming new partners in identifying critical issues in breast cancer research. Medical oncologists involved in breast cancer research are facing a new challenge: the optimal integration of traditional breast cancer therapies, namely endocrine treatments and chemotherapy, and entirely new strategies targeting signal transduction, apoptosis or angiogenesis. In view of the above, there is no doubt that we are entering a new and exciting era in breast cancer clinical research.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: adjuvant therapy ; breast cancer ; docetaxel ; feasibility
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background and purpose:Docetaxel is an active agent in thetreatment of metastatic breast cancer. We evaluated the feasibility ofdocetaxel-based sequential and combination regimens as adjuvant therapies forpatients with node-positive breast cancer. Patients and methods:Three consecutive groups of patients withnode-positive breast cancer or locally-advanced disease, aged ≤70 years,received one of the following regimens: a) sequential A → T → CMF:doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 q 3 weeks × 3, followed by docetaxel 100mg/m2 q 3 weeks × 3, followed by i.v. CMF days 1 + 8 q 4weeks × 3; b) sequential accelerated A → T → CMF: A and T wereadministered at the same doses q 2 weeks; c) combination therapy: doxorubicin50 mg/m2 + docetaxel 75 mg/m2 q 3 weeks × 4,followed by CMF × 4. When indicated, radiotherapy was administeredduring or after CMF, and tamoxifen started after the end of CMF. Results:Seventy-nine patients have been treated. Median age was48 years. A 30% rate of early treatment discontinuation was observedin patients receiving the sequential accelerated therapy (23% duringA → T), due principally to severe skin toxicity. Median relativedose-intensity was 100% in the three treatment arms. The incidence ofG3–G4 major toxicities by treated patients, was as follows: skintoxicity a: 5%; b: 27%; c: 0%; stomatitis a: 20%;b: 20%; c: 3%. The incidence of neutropenic fever was a:30%; b: 13%; c: 48%. After a median follow-up of 18months, no late toxicity has been reported. Conclusions:The accelerated sequential A → T → CMFtreatment is not feasible due to an excess of skin toxicity. The sequentialnon accelerated and the combination regimens are feasible and under evaluationin a phase III trial of adjuvant therapy.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: BCL-2 ; breast cancer ; HER-2 ; p53 ; predictive factor
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background:The selection of therapies for breast cancer is todaybased on prognostic features (chemotherapy, radiotherapy), hormone receptorstatus (hormonal therapy) and HER-2 status (trastuzumab therapy). HER-2,p53and BCL-2are tumour-related proteins that have thepotential to further improve individualisation of patient management, bypredicting response to chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and radiotherapy. Materials and methods:This paper reviews the rationale for theuse of these proteins as predictive factors, as well as the publishedliterature addressing the use of each one to predict response to hormonaltherapy, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Results:HER-2, p53and BCL-2remaininadequately assessed as predictive factors in breast cancer. HER-2 evaluationis required for the selection of patients for trastuzumab (Herceptin®)therapy, as trials of this therapy have been limited to HER-2 overexpressors.HER-2 overexpression may be predictive of resistance to hormonal therapy.Anthracyclines are effective therapy for breast cancer regardless of HER-2status, but patients whose tumours overexpress HER-2 appear to receive thegreatest relative benefit from this therapy. Studies of HER-2 as a predictorof response to CMF and to radiotherapy are inconclusive at this time. No datayet exist to support the use of p53or BCL-2as predictivefactors in the therapy of breast cancer. Conclusions:At this point in time, there is inadequate evidenceto support the use of HER-2, p53or BCL-2to guide theselection of hormonal therapy, chemotherapy or radiotherapy for breast cancer.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1569-8041
    Keywords: anastrozole ; aromatase inhibitors ; breast cancer ; hormonal therapy ; letrozole ; review ; vorozole
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Three new aromatase inhibitors have recently completed phase III evaluation as treatment of metastatic breast cancer in post-menopausal women whose disease has progressed despite tamoxifen therapy: anastrozole (ARIMIDEX, Zeneca), letrozole (FEMARA, Novartis) and vorozole (RIVIZOR, Janssen). All belong to the third generation of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors, and each is superior to previous generations in terms of potency and selectivity. The trials that have been performed compare each agent to megestrol acetate, and letrozole and vorozole to aminoglutethimide. Although the studies are not directly comparable due to differing study designs and patient populations, it has been demonstrated each of these drugs provides single agent, once-daily, oral palliation of hormone-responsive, post-menopausal metastatic breast cancer. Letrozole is clearly more effective than megestrol acetate, and anastrozole and vorozole are possibly so. All three are better tolerated than the progestin, particularly in terms of weight gain. Both letrozole and vorozole are significantly more effective, and better tolerated than aminoglutethimide. Overall, this most recent generation of aromatase inhibitors is a clear improvement on our current standard second-line therapies. In 1999, tamoxifen remains the first choice in the hormonal therapy of breast cancer. Following tamoxifen failure, the optimal second-line hormonal therapy remains undefined, but aminoglutethimide and megestrol acetate are no longer optimal therapy in this setting. The third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors must now be compared to each other, to the steroidal aromatase inhibitors, to the pure anti-oestrogens, and to tamoxifen.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    ISSN: 1573-7217
    Keywords: aromatase inhibitor ; breast cancer ; liarozole ; retinoic acid
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Liarozole is an imidazole compound that inhibits enzymes involved in steroid hormone aromatisation and retinoid metabolism. The IDBBC branch of the EORTC has performed a series of phase II studies of the agent in four groups of postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. This paper reports the results of the first two groups: ‘Chemotherapy Resistant’ (unrestricted ER status, 1 or 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, 0–2 prior hormonal therapies) and ‘Potentially Hormone Sensitive’ (ER positive or unknown, 1 or 2 prior hormonal therapies with a substantial disease free interval or progression free survival, and no history of chemotherapy for metastatic disease). Liarozole was administered at 150–300 mg orally bid. The objective response rate was 12% in the ‘Chemotherapy Resistant’ group (n=34), and 22% in the ‘Potentially Hormone Sensitive’ group (n=37), with median response durations of 9 and 14 months, respectively. Median time to treatment failure was only 2 months in both groups, due largely to the significant percentage (24%) of patients who ceased treatment following excessive mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal toxicity. This adverse event profile will limit its use in breast cancer. Results of the ‘ER negative’ and ‘Tamoxifen Refractory’ groups will be reported in a future paper.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...