Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Bognor Regis [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell
    Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry 33 (1995), S. 97-107 
    ISSN: 0887-624X
    Keywords: transesterification ; interfaces ; diffusion ; mixing ; solvent effect ; Chemistry ; Polymer and Materials Science
    Source: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: This article presents a unique example dealing with how chemical reactions between immiscible polymers in the melt behave differently than they would do in solution. Specifically, a model reaction was chosen: the transesterification between poly(ethylene-co-methyl acrylate) (EMA) and polystyrene mono-hydroxylated at the chain end (PSOH). It was carried out in the melt in a batch mixer. The overall rate of this reaction has a similar dependence of temperature, composition of reactants, and the nature and concentration of catalyst as in solution. The reactivity of PSOH decreases drastically with increasing molecular weight, and it becomes very weak when the molecular weight exceeds 8000 g/mol. As opposed to a reaction in solution or in a homogeneous melt, mechanical mixing increases the reaction rate since it generates interfacial area and reduces the diffusion length. The EMA-g-PS graft copolymer formed at the interfaces reduces the interfacial tension, and increases the miscibility of the reaction mixture. However, its occupation of the interfaces reduces contact between the reactive moieties, thus decreasing the overall reactivity. More importantly and much to our surprise, adding 1 to 2 wt % of an inert solvent increased greatly the overall reaction rate. While an increased interfacial mixing and diffusion by the presence of minor amounts of solvent are thought to be the major factors contributing to the drastic increase in reactivity, numerous questions still remain. Nevertheless, this study clearly showed that as opposed to a reaction in solution, mechanical mixing and the presence of minor amounts of solvent are two additional and critical means to control chemical reactions between immiscible polymer melts. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Additional Material: 17 Ill.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Bognor Regis [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell
    Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 36 (1998), S. 2153-2163 
    ISSN: 0887-6266
    Keywords: reactive blending ; kinetics ; interface ; mixing ; coalescence ; Physics ; Polymer and Materials Science
    Source: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Physics
    Notes: We present an experimental study of polymer-polymer reaction kinetics at the interfaces between two immiscible polymer phases under flow in a batch mixer of type Haake Rheocord. To that end, we have developed a model chemical system that is composed of a mixture of polystyrene (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA). A small fraction of PS bear hydroxyl terminal group (PS-OH) and that of PMMA contain nonclassical isocyanate moieties that are randomly distributed along the PMMA chains (PMMA-r-NCO). This reactive system is particularly pertinent to modeling practical reactive blending processes because the amount and rate of copolymer formation can be determined with great accuracy (on the order of ppm). This study shows that the overall reaction rate is controlled primarily by interfacial generation through convective mixing. Most reaction and morphological development are accomplished within a very short period of time (1-3 min). For a PS/PMMA (60/40) reactive blend, the ultimate size of the PMMA particles is as small as 0.2 μm and is reached within 2 to 3 min. A surface coverage of about 0.5 of the PMMA particles by a monolayer of the copolymer is enough to prevent dynamic coalescence, whereas a much higher surface coverage is needed to eliminate static coalescence. In the nonentangled regime (Mn of the PS-OH = 7800 g/mol), temperature has a significant effect on the reaction rate, while it has little effect in the entangled regime (Mn of the PS-OH = 53,200 g/mol). © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 36: 2153-2163, 1998
    Additional Material: 9 Ill.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...