Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1573-904X
    Keywords: individual bioequivalence ; within-subject variability ; subject-by-formulation interaction ; subgroups
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract Purpose. The FDA has proposed replacing the current averagebioequivalence criterion with population and individual bioequivalence criteriathat consider variances in addition to the difference of averages. Oneof these variances in the individual bioequivalence criterion measuressubject-by-formulation interaction, the extent to which thetest-reference difference varies from person to person. This paper discussesconceptual and statistical issues raised in various publications andpresentations with respect to the presence and estimation of such aninteraction. Methods. We focus on the importance of subject-by-formulationinteraction, an understanding of what is a large interaction, and theassessment of the magnitude of this interaction in bioequivalence studies.Simulation studies, examples from the literature, and data from FDAfiles are used to demonstrate the magnitude of the interaction and itsdistribution under various conditions. Results. The concept of a large interaction is tied to the concept of alarge mean difference. We suggest that an interaction greater than0.15 is a conservative criterion for a large interaction. Magnitudes ofestimated interaction are affected by variability, sample size, and theselection of data sets that pass average bioequivalence. Conclusions. Examples of substantial interactions are beginning toappear. More data is needed before reaching definitive conclusionsregarding the frequency and importance of observed interactions.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-904X
    Keywords: methylphenidate ; average bioequivalence ; individual bioequivalence ; human ; pharmacokinetics ; replicated design
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract Purpose. To determine the relative bioavailability of two marketed,immediate-release methylphenidate tablets. The study used a replicatedstudy design to characterize intrasubject variability, and determinebioequivalence using both average and individual bioequivalencecriteria. Methods. A replicated crossover design was employed using 20subjects. Each subject received a single 20 mg dose of the reference tableton two occasions and two doses of the test tablet on two occasions.Blood samples were obtained for 10 hr after dosing, and plasma wasassayed for methylphenidate by GC/MS. Results. The test product was more rapidly dissolved in vitro and morerapidly absorbed in vivo than the reference product. The mean Cmaxand AUC(0 − ∞) differed by 11% and 9%, respectively. Using anaverage bioequivalence criterion, the 90% confidence limits for theLn-transformed Cmax and AUC(0 − ∞), comparing the two replicatesof the test to the reference product, fell within the acceptable range of80–125%. Using an individual bioequivalence criterion the test productfailed to demonstrate equivalence in Cmax to the reference product. Conclusions. The test and reference tablets were bioequivalent usingan average bioequivalence criterion. The intrasubject variability of thegeneric product was greater and the subject-by-formulation interactionvariance was borderline high. For these reasons, the test tablets werenot individually bioequivalent to the reference tablets.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...