Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Digestive diseases and sciences 34 (1989), S. 1553-1558 
    ISSN: 1573-2568
    Keywords: midazolam ; liver biopsy ; benzodiazepines ; procedure amnesia
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The standard procedure for percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) involves only the use of local anesthesia. However, at times, a PLB can be frightening and uncomfortable. Such experiences often limit the willingness of patients to undergo subsequent follow-up biopsies. To investigate the ability of midazolam, a new water-soluble benzodiazepine preparation, noted for its potency, rapid onset of action, and amnestic qualities, to enhance patient acceptability of a follow-up liver biopsy, a “sedative dose” of midazolam (2 mg) or saline was administered immediately prior to and following a percutaneous liver biopsy. The initial dose was used to sedate the subject while not impairing patient cooperation during the biopsy procedure; the second dose was used to induce amnesia for the biopsy procedure. The next morning patient recollection for the preceding biopsy procedure and their willingness to undergo a future PLB were assessed using a questionnaire. Forty-one patients (ages 18–78) were randomized to receive either midazolam (N=21) or saline/ placebo (N=20) treatment. All PLBs were obtained with a Trucut needle. All subjects were given 2–5 cc of 2% xylocaine local anesthetic at the biopsy site. The questionnaire utilized evaluated patient experience of the procedure with respect to their recall, level of anxiety during the procedure, and willingness to undergo a repeat procedure. The data obtained revealed that those receiving midazolam admitted to experiencing less discomfort during the biopsy procedure (P〈0.04) and had less memory for the procedure (P〈0.001). More importantly, 79% of those receiving midazolam stated they would have little or no trouble undergoing a subsequent PLB as compared to 55% of those given saline. These data suggest that midazolam (1) reduces subject anxiety and perceived discomfort before and during PLB; (2) produces partial amnesia for the biopsy experience; and (3) thereby may improve patient acceptance of follow-up liver biopsies should such be required.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-2568
    Keywords: midazolam ; conscious sedation ; endoscopy
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract This study compares the effects of two different benzodiazepines used for conscious sedation during combined upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy. Subjects were assessed for their degree of analgesia and amnesia for the procedure, prior experience with endoscopy, and willingness to undergo another similar procedure should such be necessary. The patients were randomized single blind to receive either midazolam or diazepam for their preprocedure sedation. The amount of preprocedure sedation utilized was determined by titration of the dose to achieve slurring of speech. Prior to receiving either agent, the subjects were shown a standard card containing pictures of 10 common objects, were asked to name and remember them, and were told they would be “quizzed” (at 30 min and 24 hr) after being sedated for their recollection as to the objects pictured on the card. Each subject filled out a questionnaire addressing their perceived discomfort during the endoscopic procedure and their memory of the procedure 24 hr after the procedure. Sixty-three percent of the midazolam-sedated subjects reported total amnesia for their colonoscopy vs 20% of diazepam-sedated patients (P〈0.001). Fifty-three percent of midazolam-sedated patients reported total amnesia of their upper gastrointestinal endoscopy vs only 23% of diazepam-sedated subjects (P〈0.05). The midazolam-sedated subjects reported experiencing less pain with both upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (P〈0.05) and colonoscopy (P〈0.001) than did the diazepam-sedated group. Most importantly, the midazolam group was more willing to undergo another similar endoscopic procedure should they be asked to do so by their physician (P〈0.05). Subjects greater than 60 years of age required significantly less midazolam for sedation than did the younger subjects (P〈0.001). This difference in dosing based upon age was not observed in the diazepam-sedated group. Based upon these data we conclude that midazolam is superior to diazepam in producing conscious sedation for combined upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy with regard to: (1) amnesia for the procedures, (2) discomfort experienced at the time of the procedure, and (3) better patient acceptance of future gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...