ISSN:
1573-8744
Keywords:
population pharmacokinetics
;
NONMEM
;
simulations
;
bias
;
standard error
;
confidence intervals
;
monoexponential model
;
clinical trials
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Chemistry and Pharmacology
Notes:
Abstract In a simulation study of the estimation of population pharmacokinetic parameters, including fixed and random effects, the estimates and confidence intervals produced by NONMEM were evaluated. Data were simulated according to a monoexponential model with a wide range of design and statistical parameters, under both steady state (SS) and nonSS conditions. Within the range of values for population parameters commonly encountered in research and clinical settings, NONMEM produced parameter estimates for CL, V, σCL,and σe which exhibit relatively small biases. As the range of variability increases, these biases became larger and more variable. An important exception was bias in the estimate for σv which was large even when the underlying variability was small. NONMEM standard error estimates are appropriate as estimates of standard deviation when the underlying variability is small. Except in the case of CL,standard error estimates tend to deteriorate as underlying variability increases. An examination of confidence interval coverage indicates that caution should be exercised when the usual 95% confidence intervals are used for hypothesis testing. Finally, simulationbased corrections of point and interval estimates are possible but corrections must be performed on a casebycase basis.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01062194
Permalink
