Library

Notes: Background  Head and neck dermatitis (HND) is a variant of atopic dermatitis often seen in young adults. A hypersensitivity to Malassezi antigens is considered to be of pathogenic importance. Previous mostly uncontrolled studies have shown that oral antimycotics might be of use in this condition.Objective  To evaluate the efficacy of itraconazole in the treatment of HND in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Patients  Adult patients with HND were included. Systemic steroids and oral/topical antimycotics were avoided 1 and 2 months prior to the trial. Topical steroids were not allowed in the head and neck area within 2 weeks. Patients in generally good health were included and female patients had to have had a negative urine pregnancy test. The patients signed an informed consent.Study design  The study included a 7-day treatment period and a follow-up period of 105 days. Control visits were carried out on days 3, 7 and 14 and after 15 weeks.Methods  The SCORAD index (one for the head and neck area and one for the remaining surface area) and global evaluations by patient and investigator were used for clinical evaluation at each visit. Prick tests with Malassezia antigens and Candida albicans antigen were carried out at the start of the trial and included positive and negative controls. The patients were randomized into three groups, which were treated with 400 mg itraconazole daily, 200 mg itraconazole daily or placebo, respectively, for 7 days.Results  The number of patients included was 53: 18 had 200 mg itraconazole daily, 17 had 400 mg itraconazole daily and 18 placebo. At days 7 and 14, significant improvement was seen in the SCORAD of the head and neck area for the groups given 400 mg itraconazole daily (P = 0.0385 and P = 0.0134), and 200 mg daily (P = 0.0104 and P = 0.0006). Patients in the placebo group improved slightly (P = 0.0785). At day 14, comparison of improvement of SCORAD of the head and neck area between all three groups showed a significant difference in favour of the 200 mg itraconazole group compared to the placebo group (P = 0.0318). The prick test was positive for Pityrosporum ovale in 37% and negative for C. albicans in all patients.Conclusions  One week of treatment with 200 or 400 mg itraconazole as a single treatment has a significant effect on the head and neck area. Compared to placebo there was a significant improvement in SCORAD of the head and neck area in favour of the 200 mg itraconazole group after 14 days. The important observation seems to be that antifungal systemic treatment has a significant SCORAD reduction of atopic dermatitis, irrespective of the presence of allergy.

Notes: Chronic hand eczema can be incapacitating, and there is little knowledge of the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with topical corticosteroids. We compared the efficacy and safety of two different schedules for the treatment of chronic hand eczema with a potent topical corticosteroid, mometasone furoate. In a prospective, open, randomized trial, 120 patients with chronic hand eczema were treated daily with mometasone furoate fatty cream until the dermatitis cleared or for a maximum of 9 weeks. Those who cleared were randomized to treatment for up to 36 weeks with mometasone furoate on Sunday, Tuesday and Thursday (group A), mometasone furoate on Saturday and Sunday (group B) or no further corticosteroid treatment (group C). In the event of relapse, patients were permitted daily treatment with mometasone furoate for 3 weeks on two separate occasions. For 50 of 106 randomized patients, daily treatment for 3 weeks controlled their dermatitis; 29 needed 6 weeks and 27 needed 9 weeks of treatment. During the maintenance phase, 29 of 35 (83%) in group A, 25 of 37 (68%) in group B and nine of 34 (26%) in group C had no recurrences (P = 0.001, χ2-test). Side-effects were minimal. It is concluded that long-term, intermittent treatment of chronic hand eczema with mometasone furoate fatty cream is effective and safe.

Notes: Summary Three cases of acrodermatitis enteropathica (a. e.) from two nonrelated families are described. Two siblings had characteristic symptoms of a. e. in childhood. Both survived to adulthood without treatment, at which time the clinical picture became uncharacteristic of a. e. Even so, the serum zinc levels confirmed the diagnosis in both cases. The third case showed classic symptoms of a. e.; the patient had a greatly reduced serum zinc level and responded at once to treatment with zinc sulphate. Heterozygous carriers of the gene for a. e. have often had slightly reduced serum zinc levels. The value of this test could probably be improved by corresting the normal range of serum zinc for factors known to influence this, such as the patient's age and serum albumin level. The normal range ought also to be corrected for diural and postprandial variations of serum zinc.