ISSN:
1530-0358
Keywords:
Colorectal surgery complications
;
Preoperative risk assessment
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Abstract Our aim was to analyze the predictive value of a variety of preoperative risk factors on operative outcomes. We reviewed all colorectal resections performed in a single hospital between January 1985 and May 1990. Nine hundred seventy-two resections were performed on 825 patients. We studied 17 preoperative risk factors generated from various medical risk categories. Using the multivariate discriminant function analysis, we calculated that 11 of the 17 risks were of significance in predicting outcomes (all with P ≤0.031). These factors included emergent operation, age ≥75 years, congestive heart failure (CHF), prior abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy, corticosteroid use, albumin 〈2.7 g/dl, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), previous myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes, cirrhosis, and renal insufficiency. The classification function generated by the discriminant analysis was used to categorize patients into one of four risk groups depending on their “risk score.” The index used to develop each patient's “risk score” ranged from six points for an emergency operation to one point for diabetes. The mortality rates for the various risk groups were as follows: Group 1, zero to four points, 1 percent; Group 2, five to eight points, 10 percent; Group 3, 9 to 13 points, 19 percent; Group 4, 〉13 points, 33 percent. In contrast to previous reports, we showed that age ≥75 years alone is not a major preoperative risk factor but, rather, acts as a modifier for the other predictors of postoperative complications. We then assessed clinical questions concerning specific preoperative risks, such as steroid use, obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, COPD, and prior laparotomy, and their associated specific postoperative complications and have developed prevention strategies based on these findings. Through the use of the risk index, we also were able to assess an individual patient's operative risk more accurately.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02050665
Permalink
