Library

Notes: Aims:  To undertake a clinicopathological study of diffuse serosal neoplasms of epithelial histogenesis which clinically and pathologically mimic malignant pleural mesothelioma.Methods and results:  Over a 10-year (1990–2000) study period 53 carcinomas mimicking diffuse pleural mesothelioma (‘pseudomesotheliomatous’ carcinoma) were identified. The study group comprised 50 men and three females, age range 33–77 (median 68) years. In 46 (87%) cases there was a history of smoking and in 40 (76%) cases a history of asbestos exposure. Histologically the pleural ‘pseudomesotheliomatous’ carcinomas could be divided into two broad groups: primary pulmonary carcinomas with florid pleurotropic growth (n = 47), of which 34 (70%) were adenocarcinomas; and diffuse carcinomatous involvement of the pleura by metastatic tumour (n = 6). This latter group comprised two transitional cell carcinomas of bladder, one renal (clear) cell carcinoma, one ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, one prostatic adenocarcinoma and one squamous cell carcinoma of parotid gland origin. Follow-up data were available in 35 cases. Regardless of tumour type, survival was poor (median 8 months) and comparable to diffuse pleural mesothelioma.Conclusions:  Pleural ‘pseudomesotheliomatous’ carcinomas are uncommon (comprising 6% of referrals), pathologically heterogeneous tumours with poor prognosis. Tissue diagnosis should be obtained in all cases of suspected diffuse pleural neoplasia. By light microscopy and immunophenotype many of the tumours mimicked malignant mesothelioma. In particular, an awareness that all neoplasms exhibiting squamous differentiation may express cytokeratin 5/6 and thrombomodulin is important to prevent misinterpretation. In this respect, calretinin is regarded as the most specific and sensitive mesothelial marker. Misdiagnosis may have medico–legal implications in asbestos-related compensation claims.

Notes: Aims:  The development of synchronous diffuse malignant mesothelioma and carcinoma in individuals exposed to asbestos is rare. We report nine cases and discuss the medico–legal implications.Methods and results:  Five hundred patients seeking compensation for asbestos-related diffuse malignant mesothelioma were reviewed with access to post-mortem data. The study group comprised cases in which a second (non-mesothelial) neoplasm was identified. The study group comprised eight males, one female, mean age 68 years (range 60–75). All individuals gave a history of asbestos exposure. Synchronous malignant mesothelioma with carcinoma was identified in 9/500 (1.8%). Eight malignant mesotheliomas were pleural, one was primary peritoneal in origin. By morphological subtyping there were four epithelioid, three biphasic and two sarcomatoid mesotheliomas. In 6/9 (67%) the second tumour was a primary bronchogenic carcinoma (three adenocarcinomas, two squamous cell carcinomas and one small-cell carcinoma). In 3/9 (33%) the second tumour was a non-bronchogenic carcinoma (colonic, pancreatic and breast ductal adenocarcinoma). No other neoplasms were identified in the cohort of malignant mesotheliomas studied. Five persons had pathological evidence of asbestosis (four had bronchogenic carcinomas, one colorectal adenocarcinoma). Two persons with non-bronchogenic carcinomas had identifiable asbestos bodies but no interstitial fibrosis. In two cases the second neoplasms (primary bronchogenic squamous cell and small-cell carcinomas) were associated with diffuse interstitial fibrosis but no asbestos bodies were seen on light microscopy. In each case transmission electron microscopic mineral analysis revealed an asbestos fibre burden within the background population range for control subjects and well below that seen in cases of established asbestosis. These cases were considered to represent cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis in subjects with a history of asbestos exposure.Conclusions:  Synchronous malignant mesothelioma with carcinomas in asbestos-exposed workers is rare and identified in 1.8% of 500 malignant mesotheliomas in this series. In most cases the carcinoma represents a primary bronchogenic neoplasm. Primary lung carcinomas are recognized to be asbestos related only when occurring in association with asbestosis. In this series this combination (bronchogenic carcinoma and asbestosis) was seen in four (0.8%) cases. In post-mortem cases for possible malignant mesothelioma it is important to identify any other neoplasia and determine whether it is related to asbestos. Their presence impact upon anticipated life expectancy and in the presence of malignant mesothelioma will affect the compensation settlement.

Notes: Malignant epithelioid mesothelioma: anti-mesothelial marker expression correlates with histological pattern Aims: Malignant epithelioid mesothelioma shows marked cytoarchitectural diversity. The aim of the study was to evaluate how immunoreactivity with mesothelial markers related to histological pattern. Methods and results: Ninety-two cases of malignant epithelioid mesothelioma (60 pleural, 32 peritoneal) were examined and classified as exhibiting tubulopapillary, adenomatoid, solid, small cell or pleomorphic patterns. All cases were immunohistochemically stained with thrombomodulin, calretinin, CD44H, and cytokeratin 5/6. Cases of malignant mesothelioma exhibited a number of different histological forms. Immunohistochemical expression of each mesothelial marker tested was not homogeneous across different histological patterns of malignant epithelioid mesothelioma, even within the same tumour section. Calretinin (with nuclear expression) was identified to show the highest overall sensitivity and lowest range variation in staining (67% sensitivity in small cell areas to 100% expression in pleomorphic areas). Cytokeratin 5/6 and thrombomodulin yielded similar overall sensitivity. Thrombomodulin appeared to demonstrate higher sensitivity for small cell variant tumour (83% sensitivity). A notable advantage with cytokeratin 5/6 was that expression was more diffuse in nature rather than the focal membranous elaboration seen in thrombomodulin. The widest range of staining was seen in small cell mesothelioma (83% sensitivity with thrombomodulin to 17% sensitivity with cytokeratin 5/6) and in tubulopapillary areas (90% sensitivity with calretinin to 38% sensitivity with CD44H). Conclusions: Calretinin appears most useful and shows the highest overall sensitivity for malignant epithelioid mesothelioma, with good expression in areas displaying a tubulopapillary, adenomatoid, solid and pleomorphic pattern. For small cell mesothelioma, thrombomodulin appears to confer higher sensitivity and is advocated, in this setting, as the first line mesothelial marker. Cytokeratin 5/6 is a useful and easily interpretable mesothelial marker. CD44H is not of particular use in the diagnosis of malignant epithelioid mesothelioma. Accurate interpretation of immunohistochemistry in mesothelioma requires an awareness of the immunophenotypic heterogeneity identified in different histological forms of the tumour, and this is of particular importance in small biopsies.

Notes: AimsTo undertake a comparative evaluation of three antimesothelial markers (thrombomodulin, cytokeratin 5/6 and calretinin) with broad spectrum cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) in differentiating between sarcomatoid mesothelioma and a spectrum of spindle cell neoplasms.Methods and resultsThirty-one malignant sarcomatoid mesotheliomas were studied. Calretinin expression was focally identified in 12 (39%) tumours and thrombomodulin and cytokeratin 5/6 immunoreactivity was seen in nine (29%) cases. In comparison there was strong diffuse cytoplasmic reactivity with the broad spectrum cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) in 24 of 31 (77%) tumours. Thirty mixed spindle cells neoplasms were studied. No calretinin expression was identified in any case. Thrombomodulin immunoreactivity was identified in four (16%) cases (two angiosarcomas, two high-grade sarcomas, not otherwise specified). Cytokeratin 5/6 expression was seen in one high-grade pulmonary sarcoma originally termed malignant fibrous histiocytoma. None of the antimesothelial markers was expressed in the four spindle cell carcinomas studied. In contrast, broad spectrum cytokeratin was diffusely expressed in all four spindle cell carcinomas (three pulmonary, one renal), both synovial sarcomas, both malignant mixed Müllerian tumours, one of three pulmonary leiomyosarcomas and two of nine sarcomas, not otherwise specified.ConclusionsImmunohistochemistry has a more limited role in the diagnosis and distinction of sarcomatoid mesothelioma from other spindle cell neoplasms. The combination of a broad spectrum cytokeratin with calretinin combines both high sensitivity (77% for AE1/AE3) with high specificity (100% for calretinin) for sarcomatoid mesothelioma and can be diagnostically useful. The mesothelial markers, thrombomodulin and cytokeratin 5/6, are not useful alone in the diagnosis of sarcomatoid mesothelioma as each shows insufficient antibody sensitivity, although together they complement calretinin.

Notes: Value of mesothelial and epithelial antibodies in distinguishing diffuse peritoneal mesothelioma in females from serous papillary carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum Aims: To evaluate the role of mesothelial markers (calretinin, thrombomodulin, cytokeratin 5/6, and CD44H) and carcinoma markers (polyclonal and monoclonal carcinoembryonic antigen, Leu-M1, CA-125 and Ber-EP4) in distinguishing diffuse peritoneal malignant mesothelioma from primary serous papillary adenocarcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum. Methods and results: Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed blocks from 32 diffuse peritoneal mesotheliomas of epithelial subtype (all females), 20 serous papillary ovarian carcinomas and three primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinomas were studied. Calretinin and Ber-EP4 appeared to be the best positive mesothelial and carcinoma marker, respectively. Nuclear calretinin expression was identified in 28 of 32 malignant mesotheliomas with no nuclear immunoreactivity in the cohorts of serous papillary ovarian and peritoneal carcinomas, thus yielding 88% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Ber-EP4 showed 95% sensitivity and 91% specificity for serous papillary ovarian carcin- oma. Thrombomodulin, cytokeratin 5/6 and CD44H immunoreactivities were seen in 18 (56%), 17 (53%) and 15 (47%) of peritoneal mesotheliomas, respectively, and in six (30%), five (25%) and five (25%) of the ovarian tumours, respectively. None of the three primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinomas expressed calretinin, thrombomodulin, cytokeratin 5/6 or CD44H. Polyclonal and monoclonal CEA, and Leu-M1 were expressed by two (10%), one (5%) and seven (35%) serous papillary ovarian carcinomas, respectively. None of the serous papillary peritoneal carcinomas expressed polyclonal CEA, monoclonal CEA or Leu-M1. CA-125 was positive in 19 (95%) and two (67%) ovarian and peritoneal carcinomas, respectively, and in eight (25%) peritoneal mesotheliomas. Conclusions: Calretinin and Ber-EP4 are useful discriminant markers in distinguishing peritoneal mesothelioma in women from serous papillary ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma. The other mesothelial markers (thrombomodulin, cytokeratin 5/6, and CD44H) and carcinoma markers (polyclonal and monoclonal CEA, and Leu-M1) yielded a too low sensitivity for practical use.

Notes: Aims : To describe iatrogenic pathological lesions in malignant pleural mesothelioma.Methods and results : All cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma confirmed by antemortem pleural biopsy and undergoing post mortem examination over a 7-year period (1995–2001) formed the study group. This comprised 48 malignant pleural mesotheliomas [epithelioid (n = 21), biphasic (n = 14) and sarcomatoid (n = 13)]. Twenty-eight of 48 (58%) had received chemical (talc) pleurodesis, 30/48 (63%) palliative localized radiotherapy, 6/48 (13%) chemotherapy, and 14/48 (30%) surgery [12/48 (26%) pleural decortication and 2/48 (4%) pleuropneumonectomy].Conclusions : Talc pleurodesis induces a marked pseudosarcomatous fibroblastic proliferation which may impart a biphasic pattern to the neoplasm. In more chronic cases, paucicellular fibrosis with a foreign body giant cell reaction is noted. The talc is polarizable and deposited in linear fashion within the tumour. In 2/28 (7%) pleurodesis cases platyform ferruginous bodies were seen in the peripheral alveolated lung parenchyma and these mimicked asbestos bodies. An awareness of this is important to prevent false attribution to asbestos. Talc could be identified by transmission electron microscopic mineral analysis in 5/15 (33%) cases examined. Tumour nodules developing subjacent to iatrogenic wound sites were noted in 8/48 (17%) cases. In 6/8 (75%) of these cases, comparative assessment of the locally irradiated subcutaneous chest wall tumour, with background pleural mesothelioma, showed no morphological difference in architectural tumour growth pattern, extent of necrosis, cytological or nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity or tumour immunophenotype. In 2/8 (25%) cases the locally irradiated tumour showed prominent bizarre multinucleated tumour giant cells and intense mixed inflammation, a feature not seen in the background (non-irradiated) tumour. All six malignant pleural mesotheliomas receiving chemotherapy appeared refractory to treatment in that chemotherapy did not appear to have any significant effect on the tumour morphology, cytonuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity, extent of necrosis or immunophenotype. In the 12 decortication specimens and two pleuropneumonectomy resections, post mortem examination identified evidence of residual malignant mesothelioma of similar morphological subtype and immunophenotype to the resected tumour.

Notes: Aims:  To evaluate the expression of the intermediate filament desmin in reactive mesothelium and malignant mesothelioma and to compare its utility with five other previously reported immunomarkers claimed to be of use in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium.Methods and results:  Sixty cases of malignant pleural mesothelioma and 40 cases of reactive mesothelial hyperplasia formed the study group. Cases were immunohistochemically stained with desmin, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), p53, Bcl-2, P-glycoprotein and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R) β-chain by the avidin–biotin complex method. The cohort of malignant pleural mesotheliomas were immunoreactive to desmin, EMA and p53 in 6/60 (10%), 48/60 (80%) and 27/60 (45%), respectively. In comparison, the cohort of reactive mesothelial hyperplasias were immunoreactive to desmin, EMA and p53 in 34/40 (85%), 8/40 (20%) and 0/40 (0%), respectively. In a smaller cohort (n = 15) of malignant pleural mesotheliomas, Bcl-2, P-glycoprotein and PDGF-R β-chain were expressed in 0/15 (0%), 2/15 (13%) and 15/15 (100%), respectively. In a small cohort (n = 15) of reactive mesothelial hyperplasias, Bcl-2, P-glycoprotein and PDGF-R β-chain were immunoreactive in 0/15 (0%), 0/15 (0%) and 6/15 (40%), respectively.Conclusions:  Desmin and EMA appear to be the most useful markers in distinguishing benign from malignant mesothelial proliferations. Desmin appears to be preferentially expressed in reactive mesothelium and EMA appears to be preferentially expressed in neoplastic mesothelium. The complementary use of both markers is advocated in ascertaining the nature of mesothelial proliferations. Immunohistochemical detection of mutated p53 oncoprotein appeared to be of less utility in this study on account of the low marker sensitivity for malignant mesothelioma. However, p53 antibody may be of use as a second-line marker of neoplastic mesothelium within a standard immunohistochemical panel of antibodies. In this study, Bcl-2, P-glycoprotein and PDGF-R β-chain appear to be of no use in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic mesothelium, although more formal evaluation of these markers is required.