Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Journal of oral rehabilitation 16 (1989), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1365-2842
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Sixty-two dental students judged not to be in need of treatment for craniomandibular disorder (CMD) were randomly divided into two groups, one receiving occlusal adjustment and the other mock adjustment. A double-blind study design was applied. After 2 years of education in dentistry, including courses in stomatognathic physiology, the increase in the subjective symptoms of CMD was significantly greater in the placebo control group than in the treatment group. The difference between the groups in the increase of sites tender to palpation was less clear, showing only a trend. However, the increase was statistically significant within the placebo group but not within the treatment group. Prophylactic occlusal adjustment thus appears to be effective in reducing the occurrence of symptoms of CMD, and possibly also the occurrence of clinical signs.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Fire technology 23 (1987), S. 175-185 
    ISSN: 1572-8099
    Keywords: Fire evaluation ; expert ; consensus ; stability ; reliability ; validity ; scaling measurement
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Architecture, Civil Engineering, Surveying
    Notes: Abstract In this article some of the methodological problems associated with using the Delphi technique for the development of a Firesafety Evaluation (Points) Scheme are examined. These problems relate to: questionnaire design, the merits and demerits of Delphi groups versus panel groups, the definition of key terms (such as expert, consensus and stability), the reliability, validity and level of measurement achieved by Likert-type scaling techniques, and the differences in the decisionmaking processes of expert and nonexpert groups.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...