ISSN:
1248-9204
Keywords:
Incisional hernia
;
Surgical treatment
;
Prosthesis
;
Infection
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
Summary The aim of this study was to assess the infective risks involved in the placement of a non-absorbable prosthesis in the abdominal wall, in the treatment of abdominal hernias. Two groups of patients were compared over the period 1985 to 1995. Group A (N=47) received non-absorbable (Mersilene) prostheses, placed in a potentially infected area (Altemeier class 2, 3 and 4). Group B (N=47, Altemeier class 1) comprised a similar group of patients to those in group A. The prostheses were usually placed in the retro-muscular prefascial plane. Antibiotics were given either prophylactically or therapeutically, according to the degree of sepsis surrounding the operation. The length of hospital stay was longer in group A (15.6 ± 9 as against 10 ± 6 days. p=0,0006). There were two deaths in group A and none in group B (not significant). The general complication rate was 23.7% in group A as against 8.5% in group B (p=0.016). There was no significant difference between the two groups in regard to surgical complications (group A 23.7%, group B 21.3%). The infection rate in the abdominal wall was 10.6% and 6.4% in groups A and B respectively (not significant). There was only one patient with a prosthetic infection (in group A) requiring revision. We conclude that the use of non-absorbable prostheses placed in the retromuscular prefascial space may be more widely employed, in the course of potentially contaminated intra-abdominal surgery of Altemeier class 2.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01234750
Permalink
