Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 97 (1992), S. 8181-8187 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: The perturbation theory of intermolecular forces in conjunction with the supermolecular Møller–Plesset perturbation theory is applied to the analysis of the potential-energy surfaces of Kr–H2O and Kr–NH3 complexes. The valleylike minimum region on the potential-energy surface of Kr–H2O ranges from the coplanar geometry with the C2 axis of H2O nearly perpendicular to the O–Kr axis (T structure) to the H-bond structure in which Kr faces the H atom of H2O. Compared to the previously studied Ar–H2O [J. Chem. Phys. 94, 2807 (1991)] the minimum has more of the H-bond character. The minimum for Kr–NH3 corresponds to the T structure only, in accordance to the result for Ar–NH3 [J. Chem. Phys. 91, 7809 (1989)]. The minima in Kr–H2O and Kr–NH3 are roughly 27% and 19%, respectively, deeper than for the analogous Ar complexes. To examine the proton–donor abilities of O–H and N–H bonds the ratios of the deformation energy to dispersion energy are considered. They reflect fundamental differences between the two bonds and explain why NH3 is not capable of forming the H-bond structures to rare-gas atoms.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 94 (1991), S. 6677-6685 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: The combination of supermolecular Møller–Plesset treatment with the perturbation theory of intermolecular forces is applied in the analysis of the potential energy surface of ArHCl. Two minima have been found, a primary for collinear Ar–HCl and a secondary for collinear Ar–ClH. The depths of these minima are about 12% below the empirical estimates, due to basis set unsaturation of the dispersion contribution. The Ar–HCl structure is favored by the induction and dispersion terms whereas Ar–ClH by the exchange–repulsion term. The total ab initio potential, as well as its components, are compared with related terms of recent Hutson's H6(3) potential [J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4550 (1988)] and the anisotropy of interaction is analyzed. It is concluded that the one-center multipole expansions of induction and dispersion contributions do not reproduce the correct anisotropy of induction and dispersion terms. Ab initio estimates of three-body effects in the Ar2HCl complex are also discussed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 94 (1991), S. 2807-2816 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: The combination of supermolecular Møller–Plesset treatment with the perturbation theory of intermolecular forces is applied in the analysis of the potential-energy surface of Ar–H2O. The surface is very isotropic with the lowest barrier for rotation of ∼35 cm−1 above the absolute minimum. The lower bound for De is found to be 108 cm−1 and the complex reveals a very floppy structure, with Ar moving freely from the H-bridged structure to the coplanar and almost perpendicular arrangement of the C2 –water axis and the Ar–O axis, "T-shaped'' structure. This motion is almost isoenergetic (energy change of less than 2 cm−1 ). The H-bridged structure is favored by the attractive induction and dispersion anisotropies; the T-shaped structure is favored by repulsive exchange anisotropy. The nonadditive effect in the Ar2–H2O cluster was also calculated. Implications of our results on the present models of hydrophobic interactions are also discussed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 92 (1990), S. 4357-4363 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: The basis set effects on the total self-consistent field (SCF) and second-order Møller–Plesset (MP2) interaction energies in the HF dimer (in the equilibrium geometry) are investigated in relation to their components: electrostatic, exchange, induction, and dispersion, calculated within the framework of intermolecular Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (IMPPT). The basis set dependence of the SCF interaction energy in the HF dimer is almost exactly determined by the electrostatic contribution. The exchange, induction, and the SCF-deformation terms are found substantially less sensitive. The MP2 correlation contribution reflects primarily the basis set dependence of dispersion. However, an accurate image of the basis set dependence is reproduced only if the electrostatic-correlation term is considered as well. Other correlation contributions: the deformation- correlation and exchange terms are found to be much less sensitive to basis set effects. All these conclusions are valid only under the condition that the supermolecular interaction energies are counterpoise-corrected for the basis set superposition error and IMPPT interaction energies are calculated with the full basis set of the dimer.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 92 (1990), S. 2481-2487 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Nonadditive, multibody effects arising in the supermolecular Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MPPT) (IMPPT) calculations are classified and interpreted in terms of the exchange, induction, deformation, and dispersion contributions, as defined by the perturbation theory of intermolecular forces. As an example the many-body effects in the equilateral Ar trimer and tetrahedral Ar tetramer, calculated through the MP4 level of theory with extended basis [7s4p2d], are reported and discussed. It is stressed that the "Heitler–London-exchange plus dispersion'' model for nonadditive effects is too attractive mainly because of the neglect of the second-order exchange contribution.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 96 (1992), S. 463-469 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: The perturbation theory of intermolecular forces in conjunction with the supermolecular Møller–Plesset treatment is applied in the analysis of the potential energy surface of Ar–CH4. The anisotropy of the Ar–CH4 potential energy surface is chiefly due to exchange repulsion. In the equilibrium structure, Ar approaches the face of CH4 tetrahedron thus avoiding contacts with C–H bonds. The equilibrium Ar–C separation was found equal to 7.5 a0 and the De energy to 113 cm−1. We estimate that our De may be too small by up to 25% with respect to the accurate value. The properties of Ar–CH4 are also compared with other Ar-molecule systems, such as Ar–NH3, Ar–H2O, and Ar–HCl. We find that the equilibrium structures of weak proton donors bound to Ar (CH4, NH3) are determined by the exchange repulsion, while those of efficient proton donors, such as HCl (and to a lesser extent H2O), result from the strong polarization of Ar in the field of a molecule.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 91 (1989), S. 7048-7056 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Nonadditive effects are calculated for (HF)3 and (HCl)3 complexes and analyzed via the combination of perturbation theory of intermolecular forces with Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MPPT). In both systems the nonadditivity is dominated by the self-consistent field (SCF) deformation effect, i.e., mutual polarization of the monomer wavefunctions. Heitler–London exchange and correlation effects are of secondary importance. Three-body terms exhibit much lesser basis set dependence than the two-body effects and even quite moderate basis sets which are not accurate enough for treatment of two-body forces can yield three-body effects of quantitative quality. This is due in large measure to the additivity of strongly basis set dependent components such as uncorrelated and correlated electrostatics and dispersion. Various approximate models for the three-body potentials and total interaction in the (HF)3 cluster are analyzed from the point of view of their ability to predict the orientation dependence of interaction energy.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 91 (1989), S. 7809-7817 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: The combination of supermolecular Møller–Plesset treatment with the perturbation theory of intermolecular forces is applied in the analysis of the potential energy surface of Ar–NH3. Anisotropy of the self-consistent field (SCF) potential is determined by the first-order exchange repulsion. Second-order dispersion energy, the dominating attractive contribution, is anisotropic in the reciprocal sense to the first-order exchange, i.e., minima in one nearly coincide with maxima in the other. The estimated second-order correlation correction to the exchange effect is nearly as large as a half ΔESCF in the minimum and has a "smoothing'' effect on the anisotropy of ε(20)disp. The model which combines ΔESCF with dispersion energy (SCF+D) is not accurate enough to quantitatively describe both radial and angular dependence of interaction energy. Comparison is also made between Ar–NH3 and Ar–PH3, as well as with the Ar dimer.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 94 (1991), S. 2873-2883 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Nonadditive contribution to the interaction energy in water trimer is analyzed in terms of Heitler–London exchange, SCF deformation, induction and dispersion nonadditivities. Nonadditivity originates mainly from the SCF deformation effect which is due to electric polarization. However, polarization does not serve as a universal mechanism for nonadditivity in water. In the double-donor configuration, for example, the Heitler–London exchange contribution is the most important and polarization yields the wrong sign. Correlation effects do not contribute significantly to the nonadditivity. A detailed analysis of the pair potential is also provided. The present two-body potential and its components are compared to the existing ab initio potentials (MCY) as well as to empirical ones (RWK2,TIP,SPC). The ways to improve these potentials are suggested.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    College Park, Md. : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    The Journal of Chemical Physics 93 (1990), S. 4243-4253 
    ISSN: 1089-7690
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: The Heitler–London (HL) exchange energy is responsible for the anisotropy of the pair potential in methane. The equilibrium dimer structure is that which minimizes steric repulsion between hydrogens belonging to opposite subsystems. Dispersion energy, which represents a dominating attractive contribution, displays an orientation dependence which is the mirror image of that for HL exchange. The three-body correction to the pair potential is a superposition of HL and second-order exchange nonadditivities combined with the Axilrod–Teller dispersion nonadditivity. A great deal of cancellation between these terms results in near additivity of methane interactions in the long and intermediate regions.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...