Library

Notes: Background Although most of the common allergen extracts that are used for diagnosis of type 1 hypersensitivity are now well standardized, this gives no assurance that they are within the concentration range that gives the best chance of a true diagnosis.Objective The objective of this study was to identify the most appropriate concentration range of timothy grass pollen Phleum pratense extract to diagnose sensitivity to this pollen correctly through skin-testing.Methods Dilutions of a well-standardized extract were made and used to skin test ‘true’ positive and ‘true’ negative populations of subjects as identified by case history, challenge tests and radioallergosorbent test (RAST). Weal diameters were measured and the data were submitted to receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. For any particular weal size cut–off, the optimal diagnostic concentration (ODC) range was thus calculated.Results A 3 mm weal diameter cut-off was chosen as an appropriate size for routine diagnosis. Therefore the ODC range at this diameter was used to establish a product target concentration and specification for formulation of the diagnostic reagent. This method of allergen extract standardization can lead to a true-biological unitage that can be used for labelling purposes.Conclusion The optimun concentration range at which to formulate an allergen extract, in terms of an in vitro immunologically based assay, can be determined by carrying out ROC analysis of the results of clinical studies as described in this communication. Diagnostic units (DU), are now used by us for labelling of such final formulations which conveys the information that the product is at the most appropriate concentration for diagnosis.

Notes: Background Allergen-specific immunotherapy represents a causal form of treatment for IgE-mediated allergies. The allergen extract-based analyses of immunotherapy-induced effects yielded highly controversial results regarding a beneficial role of therapy-induced IgG antibodies.Objective We analysed allergen-specific IgE, IgG subclass, and IgM responses in patients treated with a grass pollen allergy vaccine adjuvanted with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL), a Th1-inducing agent, and in a placebo group using recombinant timothy grass pollen allergen molecules (rPhl p 1, rPhl p 2, rPhl p 5).Results The strong induction of allergen-specific IgG1 and IgG4 antibodies observed only in the actively treated group was associated with significant clinical improvement. Therapy-induced allergen-specific IgM and IgG2 responses were also noted in several actively treated patients. An inhibition of allergen-dependent basophil histamine release was only obtained with sera containing therapy-induced allergen-specific IgG, but not with sera obtained before therapy or from placebo-treated patients. Moreover, patients with therapy-induced allergen-specific IgG antibodies showed a reduced induction of allergen-specific IgE responses during seasonal grass pollen exposure.Conclusion Successful immunotherapy with the MPL-adjuvanted grass pollen allergy vaccine is associated with the production of allergen-specific IgG antibodies. These blocking antibodies may have protective effects by inhibiting immediate-type reactions and systemic increases of IgE responses caused by seasonal allergen exposure.

Notes: Background: We present data showing that a Th1-inducing adjuvant can reduce the number of injections required for allergy vaccination. Allergy vaccination is the only treatment for type 1 hypersensitivity that can alter the underlying disease process. A switch of specific T-cell activity from Th2〉Th1 to Th1〉Th2 is believed to be an important change seen after long-term vaccination therapy. An immunologic adjuvant that enhances such a switch could be used to reduce the number of injections required. This would improve compliance with the treatment and provide pharmacoeconomic advantages. Such an adjuvant is 3-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL® adjuvant, Corixa). Methods: A multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind clinical study was performed with a new standardized allergy vaccine comprising a tyrosine-adsorbed glutaraldehyde-modified grass pollen extract containing MPL® adjuvant. Four subcutaneous injections of the active product were given preseasonally to 81 grass pollen-sensitive subjects, and 60 received placebo injections (tyrosine alone). Diary cards were used to record symptoms and medication taken during approximately 30 days of the grass pollen season. Results: There was a statistical advantage in favour of the active treatment for nasal (P=0.016) and ocular (P=0.003) symptoms and combined symptom and medication scores (P=0.013). Titrated skin prick testing revealed a significant reduction of skin sensitivity in the active group compared to placebo (P=0.04). Grass-pollen-specific IgG antibody was raised by active treatment (P〈0.01). A rise in IgE antibody was seen in the placebo group during the season (P〈0.01). The first year's treatment rise of IgE was not seen in the active group, and no rise occurred during the pollen season. More local adverse events were seen in the active group. There was no difference in generalized adverse events. Conclusions: A new, well-tolerated allergy vaccine, incorporating a Th1-inducing adjuvant, MPL®, was efficacious and after only four preseasonal injections produced antibody changes normally associated with long injection schedules. This may encourage wider application of allergy vaccination. The vaccine is now available in a number of countries as Pollinex Quattro®.