Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    New York, NY : Wiley-Blackwell
    Journal of Morphology 151 (1977), S. 325-352 
    ISSN: 0362-2525
    Keywords: Life and Medical Sciences ; Cell & Developmental Biology
    Source: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Dissections, manipulation of ligamentary preparations, analysis of limb proportions, and quantitative aspects of forelimb myology are used to correlate forelimb morphology in fur seals and sea lions (sub-family Otariinae) with previously published data as to their locomotor function (English, '76a). Comparisons to structure and function in generalized fissiped carnivores are then used to elucidate locomotor adaptations in fur seals and sea lions. Unique features of forelimb function during swimming in these pinnipeds include the amounts of abduction-adduction and rotary movements used. Modifications of the size, attachments and fascicle architecture of the muscles and the structure and range of possible movement of the joints suggest that in fur seals and sea lions these movements (1) take place about the glenohumeral (shoulder) joints, (2) that the movements are probably finely controlled, and (3) that they contribute to the generation of massive forward thrust via the cooperative activity of muscles capable of generating large amounts of force throughout the range of movement. Recovery movements occur through a similarly large range, and modifications of forelimb anatomy either to minimize or overcome water resistance are noted. The adaptive significance of these modifications is interpreted as allowing fur seals and sea lions to swim at speeds necessary to feed on the fast swimming prey presumably abundant in their adaptive zone.
    Additional Material: 16 Ill.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    New York, NY : Wiley-Blackwell
    Journal of Morphology 191 (1987), S. 161-175 
    ISSN: 0362-2525
    Keywords: Life and Medical Sciences ; Cell & Developmental Biology
    Source: Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: The anatomy, architecture, and innervation patterns of the hamstring muscles, biceps femoris, and semitendinosus were examined in adult cats using microdissection and glycogen-depletion techniques. The biceps femoris muscle consists of two heads. The anterior head, which attaches mainly to the femur, is divided into two parts by the extramuscular branches of its nerve. The posterior head is innervated by a single nerve. Semitendinosus is composed of two heads, one proximal and one distal to a tendonous inscription, each of which is separately innervated. The extramuscular branches of the nerves to these hamstring muscles thus partition them into innervation subvolumes termed parts. The available evidence suggests that each of the parts of these muscles so innervated is not equivalent to the collections of single motor units that have been described for ankle extensors as neuromuscular compartments. It is quite likely that each of the parts of the hamstring muscles may contain more than one neuromuscular compartment. Using chronically implanted EMG electrodes, the activation patterns of different parts of the hamstring muscles were analyzed during locomotion. The anterior and middle parts of biceps femoris are active during the early stance phase, probably producing hip extensor torque. The posterior part of biceps femoris and semitendinosus act most consistently as flexors, during the early swing phase, but also may function in synergy with hip, knee, and ankle joint extensors near the time of foot placement. Greater variability is found in the activity patterns of posterior biceps femoris and semitendinosus with respect to the kinematics of the step cycle than is observed for anterior and middle biceps femoris. It is suggested that this variation may reflect a larger role of sensory feedback in shaping the timing of activity in posterior biceps femoris and semitendinosus than in ‘monarticular’ muscles.
    Additional Material: 8 Ill.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...