Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Allergy 48 (1993), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1398-9995
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: The efficacy of loratadine and terfenadine in perennial allergic rhinitis was evaluated in a double-blind, selected cross-over study consisting of two phases. During the first phase, 76 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis, 8–67 years old, were included in the study. Of these, 41 patients received loratadine 10 mg daily, and 35 patients received terfenadine 60 mg twice daily, for 2 weeks. According to symptoms and side-effects, 32 patients were classified as responders to loratadine, and 28 patients as responders to terfenadine. All observed symptoms were significantly reduced in both treatment groups, but with no significant differences between the two groups. Side-effects were few and mild. In patients with normal IgE, loratadine was significantly superior to terfenadine in relieving nasal secretion, whereas terfenadine was significantly superior to loratadine in relieving nasal congestion. In patients with increased IgE, patients treated with loratadine showed significantly greater reduction in sneezing than patients treated with terfenadine. A positive correlation between total IgE and reduction in overall symptoms was found for patients treated with loratadine, whereas a negative correlation was found for patients treated with terfenadine. During the second study phase, the nonresponders received the other drug for 2 weeks. All seven nonresponders to terfenadine responded to loratadine after crossing over, whereas four of nine nonresponders to loratadine responded to terfenadine. Nonresponders to one drug may respond to the other drug. Thus, more than one antihistamine drug should be tried in perennial allergic rhinitis if the first fails.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Allergy 49 (1994), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1398-9995
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: The aim of the study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of loratadine on pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis, considering the patients’ sensation of itch. Sixteen patients, mean age 24.8 years, with moderate or severe atopic dermatitis were included in a double-blind and placebo-controlled study with a six-period, multi-crossover design. The patients were given 10 mg loratadine or placebo every day, alternating between loratadine and placebo every 2 weeks. The degree of pruritus during the day and during the night was recorded by the patients every morning and every evening, respectively, on a 10-cm visual analog scale. The study detected a significant effect of loratadine, as compared with placebo, on pruritus during the day, pruritus during the night, and severity of rash. At least nine of the 16 patients included were classified as responders and only one as a nonresponder to loratadine treatment. It is concluded that loratadine may be tried as an adjuvant therapy in the management of severe and moderate atopic dermatitis, in patients complaining of pruritus.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...