Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 0006-291X
    Source: Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Physics
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 0006-291X
    Source: Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Physics
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 0340-1855
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Vitamin E ; chronische Polyarthritis ; Key words vitamin E ; rheumatoid arthritis
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Summary In a randomized, double blind parallel group comparison the antiphlogistic and analgetic efficacy of high-dosed vitamin E (3×400mg RRR-α-Tocopherolacetat/d) versus diclofenac-sodium has been investigated in hospitalized patients with established chronic rheumatoid arthritis. After 3 weeks of treatment the vitamin E group (n=42) as well as the diclofenac group (n=43) showed a significant improvement of all assessed clinical parameters. Duration of morning stiffness could be reduced under vitamin E treatment from 90min to 68min and under diclofenac treatment from 68min to 30min. The joint index according to Richie declined from 56 to 46 (vitamin E) and 49 to 34 (diclofenac). Grip strength increased in the vitamin E group as well as in the diclofenac group. In addition, the degree of pain, assessed by a 10cm visual analogue scale, reduced significantly under vitamin E as well as under diclofenac. Regarding the therapeutical result both, physicians and patients, considered both drugs to be similarly effective. Especially regarding the risk pro- file of NSAR in long-term treatment of chronic rheumatoid arthritis intake of high-dosed vitamin E is a possible alternative in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatoid diseases.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung In einem randomisierten, doppelblinden Parallelgruppenvergleich wurde die Wirksamkeit und Verträglichkeit von hochdosiertem Vitamin E (3×400mg RRR-α-Tocopherolacetat/d) gegen Diclofenac-Natrium (3×50mg/d) bei stationären Patienten mit gesicherter chronischer Polyarthritis geprüft. Nach einer dreiwöchigen Behandlung war sowohl unter der Vitamin E-Therapie (n=42) als auch unter der Behandlung mit Diclofenac (n=43) eine deutliche Besserung aller untersuchten klinischen Parameter zu beobachten. Die Dauer der Morgensteifigkeit verringerte sich unter der Vitamin E-Therapie von 90min auf 68min, unter der Diclofenac-Einnahme von 68min auf 30min. Der Gelenk-Index nach Ritchie ging von 56 auf 46 (Vitamin E) bzw. von 49 auf 34 (Diclofenac) zurück. Die Griffstärke erhöhte sich sowohl in der Vitamin-E-Gruppe als auch in der Diclofenac-Gruppe. Ebenso war in beiden Gruppen eine deutliche Verringerung des Schweregrades der Schmerzen, beurteilt anhand einer 10cm visuellen Analogskala zu beobachten. Das Gesamturteil von Arzt und Patient zum Therapieerfolg fiel für die beiden Arzneimittel ähnlich positiv aus. Insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund des Risikoprofils der NSAR in der Langzeitbehandlung der chronischen Polyarthritis stellt die Einnahme von hochdosiertem Vitamin E eine mögliche Alternative in der Behandlung entzündlich rheumatischer Erkrankungen dar.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: Benzodiazepines ; Antidepressants ; Lorazepam ; Alprazolam ; Amitriptyline ; Placebo ; Depressive disorder ; Drug taper ; Withdrawal and rebound phenomena
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract This randomized double-blind study in 342 mildly to moderately depressive outpatients investigated the antidepressant effectiveness and speed of action of lorazepam, alprazolam and amitriptyline versus placebo. Six weeks of drug treatment were followed by a drug taper period, a control period with placebo and a control period without placebo, of 2 weeks duration each. Clinical improvement was assessed by rating scales (Clinical Global Impressions, Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression and Anxiety) and patient's self-ratings (Patient's Global Impressions, Self-rating Depression Scale and Visual Analogue Scale). At the end of week 6 all active drugs showed similar efficacy which was significantly superior to placebo. Compared to placebo, onset of efficacy was earlier on benzodiazepines than on amitriptyline. While tapering by decreasing the dosage, replacing drug with placebo and finally discontinuing placebo, clear withdrawal phenomena were not seen, but 20% of patients, equally distributed to all treatment groups, did not want to stop taking tablets after replacing drug with placebo. Drop-out rate during the treatment period was very low (9%). Significantly interfering adverse effects were seen in 27 patients, without predominance in one of the active drug groups.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    ISSN: 1432-2072
    Keywords: Key words Buspirone ; Lorazepam ; General anxiety disorder (GAD) ; Rebound anxiety ; Withdrawal symptom
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract In this double-blind, placebo-controlled 10-week trial, the anxiolytic properties of the nonbenzodiazepine buspirone were compared with the benzo diazepine lorazepam and placebo in 125 outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder according to DSM-III. After a 3- to 7-day wash-out period, patients were allocated at random to receive orally 3 × 5 mg buspirone (n = 58), 3 × 1 mg lorazepam (n = 57), or placebo (n = 10) over a 4-week period. The study also comprised a 2-week taper period and a 4-week placebo-control period to assess the stability of clinical improvement. The patient´s clinical state was estimated on entry and at weekly intervals by general practitioners using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) assessment and by a self-rating scale (State Trait Anxiety Inventory X2 = STAI-X2). Lorazepam treatment resulted in descriptively, but not significantly, greater improvement on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety during the whole treatment (week 0–4) and taper period (week 5, 6) than did buspirone. After treatment with active drugs had been discontinued, the 4-week placebo control period showed buspirone-treated patients to display a stability of clinical improvement, while the symptoms of lorazepam-treated patients worsened at week 7–10. Both buspirone and lorazepam were more efficacious in reducing anxiety symptoms than placebo during the treatment and taper period; however, in contrast to the active drugs (buspirone, lorazepam), patients of the placebo group showed further clinical improvement during the control period, especially in the HAM-A score, so differences between placebo and active drugs became smaller at the end of the study.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...