ISSN:
1365-2842
Source:
Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
Topics:
Medicine
Notes:
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate in situ the microhardness of a composite resin, two resin-modified glass–ionomers and two polyacid-modified composite resins at different post-irradiation times. The materials analysed were: Z 100/3M (Z1); Fuji II LC/GC Corporation (Fu); Vitremer/3M (Vi); Freedom/SDI (Fr); and Dyract/Dentsply (Dy). Palatal intra-oral acrylic resin appliances were made for each of the 24 volunteers in the experiment. In each appliance, a specimen of each material was fixed. Microhardness tests were performed at 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 8, 24 and 48 h, 7, 10, 14, 17 and 21 days after initial light-curing. The analysis of variance followed by the Tukey test showed significant differences of microhardness among all materials (Fu 〈 Vi 〈 Fr 〈 Dy 〈 Z1) up to 48 h. From the seventh to the fourteenth day, statistical differences were not found between Freedom and Dyract (Fu 〈 Vi 〈 Fr=Dy 〈 Z1). On the seventeenth and twenty-first days, Vitremer, Freedom and Dyract did not present statistical differences, but differed from Fuji II LC and Z 100 (Fu 〈 Vi=Fr=Dy 〈 Z1). The polynomial regression showed an increase of microhardness over time for the glass–ionomers/composite resin hybrid materials, although there were differences of microhardness among these materials. There was no significant changes in microhardness levels for the composite resin over time.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00906.x
Permalink
