Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    British journal of dermatology 98 (1978), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1365-2133
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a fermentation product of a penicillium mould which has shown anti-tumour activity in certain animal models. It blocks nucleic acid synthesis by interfering with the interconversions of inosine monophosphate (IMP), xanthine monophosphate (XMP) and guanine monophosphate (GMP) thereby inhibiting growth and/or replication of tumour cells. In vivo activity depends on the presence of a β-glucuronidase which is abundant in the cell wall of epithelial tissues. Encouraged by results obtained in earlier clinical trials, we have studied 28 patients with psoriasis, 21 in double-blind fashion. A comparison of disease severity in patients before and after receiving MPA versus patients receiving placebo clearly showed the superiority of drug over placebo. The mean severity score of patients receiving MPA as an initial course of therapy improved by 56% versus 9% in patients receiving placebo. Patients receiving MPA after an initial course of placebo therapy showed improvement in their mean severity score averaging 86%. Those patients receiving placebo after an initial course of MPA showed worsening of their mean severity score averaging 70%. Overall, about 75% of MPA treated patients have shown good to excellent responses, and toxicity appears low. Evidence suggests that MPA may be very useful in treating severe psoriasis.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK and Malden, USA : Blackwell Science Ltd
    BJOG 112 (2005), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1471-0528
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 237 (1999), S. 117-124 
    ISSN: 1435-702X
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  · Background: A study was carried out to ascertain, in ophthalmologically normal subjects, the short-term effects of dipivefrin hydrochloride 0.1% on visual performance and make comparisons with pilocarpine. · Methods: Twelve normal volunteers aged 20–26 years attended on three occasions. One eye, randomly selected, received one drop of either pilocarpine 2%, dipivefrin or saline 0.9%. High- and low-contrast LogMAR acuity at 6 m and pupil diameter (measured by infra-red pupillometry) were recorded at baseline (T0) and at intervals up to 90 min following instillation of drops. Program 30-2 of the Humphrey Visual Field Analyzer (HFA) was run at T0 and at 60 min after treatment instillation (T60). Saline was always instilled at visit 1, to allow for learning effects. On visits 2 and 3 either pilocarpine or dipivefrin was randomly instilled into the treated eye. · Results: Pilocarpine significantly worsened the field global indices mean deviation (P〈0.001) and pattern standard deviation (P〈0.01) compared with T0. There was no significant change with dipivefrin. A significant (P=0.01) pupil dilation from 5.44 mm (SD 0.79) at T0 to 6.19 mm (SD 1.09) at T90 occurred with dipivefrin. Pilocarpine caused significant miosis. No significant changes in LogMAR values were found with dipivefrin. Pilocarpine significantly (P〈0.01) increased LogMAR values (i.e. reduced acuity) compared with dipivefrin. At T30 the mean increase in LogMAR was 0.76 (SD 0.30) for high and 0.83 (SD 0.11) for low contrast. By T90 recovery of acuity was virtually complete. · Conclusions: In normals dipivefrin causes mydriasis but does not affect the central visual field global indices (as assessed by STATPAC), or high- and low-contrast LogMAR acuity. Pilocarpine adversely affects the visual field and both measures of acuity. Knowledge of these effects is of value in glaucoma therapy and when monitoring the progression of visual loss.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...