Library

Notes: Ventricular Defibrillation and Cardiac Function. Introduction: The effect of implantable defibrillator shocks on cardiac hemodynamics is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that ventricular defibrillator shocks adversely effect cardiac hemodynamics. Methods and Results: The cardiac index was determined by calculating the mitral valve inflow with transesophogeal Doppler during nonthoracotomy defibrillator implantation in 17 patients. The cardiac index was determined before, and immediately, 1 minute, 2 minutes, and 4 minutes after shocks were delivered during defibrillation energy requirement testing with 27- to 34-, 15-, 10-, 5-, 3-, or 1-J shocks. The cardiac Index was also measured at the same time points after 27- to 34-, and 1-J shocks delivered during the baseline rhythm. The cardiac index decreased from 2.30 ± 0.40 L/min per m2 before a 27- to 34-J shock during defibrillation energy requirement testing to 2.14 ± 0.45 L/min per m2 immediately afterwards (P= 0.001). This effect persisted for 〉4 minutes. An adverse hemodynamic effect of similar magnitude occurred after 15 J (P= 0.003) and 10-J shocks (P= 0.01), but dissipated after 4 minutes and within 2 minutes, respectively. There was a significant correlation between shock strength and the percent change in cardiac index (r = 0.3, P= 0.03). The cardiac index decreased 14% after a 27- to 34-J shock during the baseline rhythm (P 〈 0.0001). This effect persisted for 〈4 minutes. A 1- J shock during the baseline rhythm did not effect the cardiac index. Conclusion: Defibrillator shocks 〉9 J delivered during the baseline rhythm or during defibrillation energy requirement testing result in a 10% to 15% reduction in cardiac index, whereas smaller energy shocks do not affect cardiac hemodynamics. The duration and extent of the adverse effect are proportional to the shock strength. Shock strength, and not ventricular fibrillation, appears to be most responsible for This effect. Therefore, the detrimental hemodynamic effects of high-energy shocks may be avoided when low-energy defibrillation is used.

Notes: Cardiac Memory. Introduction: “Cardiac memory” (primary T wave change) is thought to occur after 15 minutes to several hours of right ventricular (RV) pacing. The two components of the temporal change in repolarization are memory and accumulation. The purpose of this study was to examine quantitatively the effect of short periods of ventricular pacing on the human cardiac action potential, using monophasic action potential (MAP) recordings. Methods and Results: Thirty-one patients (ages 43 ± 14 years) with structurally normal hearts undergoing a clinically indicated electrophysiologic procedure were enrolled. Catheters were placed in the right atrium (RA) and RV, and a MAP catheter was positioned at the RV septum. APD90 was calculated from digitized MAP recordings. MAP morphology comparisons were performed using the root mean square (RMS) of the difference between complexes. All pacing was at 500-msec cycle length. There were four pacing protocols: (1) RA pacing was performed for approximately 15 minutes to evaluate temporal stability of the MAP recordings (5 pts); (2) to evaluate the memory phenomenon, four successive 1-minute episodes of RV pacing were interspersed with 2 minutes of RA pacing (5 pts); (3) the accumulation phenomenon was evaluated by assessing the effects of 1, 5, 10, and 15 minutes of RV pacing on the MAP during RA pacing (16 pts); and (4) 20 minutes of RV pacing was followed by 10 minutes of RA pacing to correlate visually apparent T wave changes with changes in MAP recordings (5 pts). In the control patients, no changes in APD90 or RMS analysis were noted during 14.9 ± 1.4 minutes of RA pacing. In the second protocol, RMS of the difference between the baseline MAP complexes and the signal average of the first 50 beats following each of four 1-minute RV pacing trains demonstrated progressively greater differences in morphology after successive episodes of RV pacing. In protocol 3, RMS analysis identified a progressively greater difference between the baseline MAP recording and the average of the first 50 beats after 1,5, 10, and 15 minutes of RV pacing. In protocol 4, visually apparent changes in T waves occurred in parallel with the RMS of the difference between the baseline MAP recordings and the average of the first 50 beats after 20 minutes of RV pacing. Similar changes also were demonstrated by APD90 analysis. Conclusion: This study is the first to demonstrate that episodes of abnormal ventricular activation as short as 1 minute in duration may exert lingering effects on the repolarization process once normal ventricular activation resumes.

Notes: Introduction: A corridor of double potentials along the ablation line has been recognized to be an indicator of complete cavotricuspid isthmus block. Isoproterenol is used to confirm cavotricuspid isthmus block, but the effects of isoproterenol on the double potential interval (DPI), either in the absence or presence of amiodarone, are unknown. Methods and Results: Thirty-two patients with isthmus-dependent atrial flutter underwent successful ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. The procedure was performed in the drug-free state in 23 patients, and 2 to 7 days after discontinuation of chronic amiodarone therapy in 9 patients. Electrograms recorded along the ablation line before and during isoproterenol infusion were analyzed after isthmus block was achieved. Double potentials were recorded along the entire ablation line upon achievement of complete isthmus block in all patients. The DPI in 9 patients treated with amiodarone was longer than in the other patients (147 ± 32 msec vs 119 ± 19 msec, P 〈 0.001). The DPI increased as the pacing cycle length shortened in patients treated with amiodarone, but not in the other patients. At all pacing cycle lengths, isoproterenol shortened the DPI to a greater extent in the patients treated with amiodarone than in the other patients. Conclusion: Amiodarone results in rate-dependent prolongation of the DPI during coronary sinus pacing after ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. Isoproterenol shortens the DPI despite the presence of complete isthmus block, and this effect is accentuated in the presence of amiodarone. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 935-939, September 2003)

Notes: Immediate Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation. Introduction: An immediate recurrence of atrial fibrillation (IRAF) appears to be more common after early restoration of sinus rhythm with an implantable atrial defibrillator than after elective transthoracic cardioversion, which suggests that the probability of IRAF may be related to the duration of AF. Methods and Results: Transthoracic cardioversion was performed 85 ± 187 days (range 7 minutes to 8 years) after the onset of atrial fibrillation in 315 patients (mean age 61 ± 13 years). IRAF was defined as a recurrence of AF within 60 seconds after restoration of sinus rhythm. IRAF occurred in 56% of patients when cardioversion was performed within 1 hour of the onset of AF compared with 12% of patients when cardioversion was performed after 24 hours of AF (P 〈 0.001). The duration of AF was the only independent predictor of IRAF among the clinical variables of age, gender, structural heart disease, antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and cardioversion energy (P 〈 0.01). Conclusion: IRAF is more likely to occur when the duration of AF is 〈1 hour than when the duration is 〉24 hours. This observation has clinical implications for the most appropriate timing of cardioversion, particularly in patients who receive device therapy for AF. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 14, pp. 182-185, February 2003)

Notes: Pulmonary Vein Tachycardia. Introduction: The significance of intermittent tachycardia within a pulmonary vein (PV) during an episode of atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the role that intermittent PV tachycardias play in AF. Methods and Results: In 56 patients with AF, segmental ostial ablation guided by PV potentials was performed to isolate the PVs. The characteristics of intermittent PV tachycardias and the inducibility of AF before and after PV isolation were analyzed prospectively. During AF, a PV tachycardia (mean cycle length 130 ± 30 msec) with exit block to the left atrium was present in 93% of left superior, 80% of left inferior, 73% of right superior, and 7% of right inferior PVs. The site of shortest cycle length during AF alternated between the PVs and left atrium 1 to 13 times per minute. Complete isolation was achieved in 168 (94%) of 178 targeted PVs. In 99% of PVs, tachycardia resolved upon isolation. AF was persistent before and after PV isolation in 100% and 27% of patients, respectively (P 〈 0.001). Conclusion: Intermittent bursts of tachycardia are observed within multiple PVs during persistent AF in a majority of patients. After PV isolation, PV tachycardias almost always resolve, and AF is less likely to be inducible or persistent. These observations suggest a dynamic interplay between the atria and PVs, with intermittent bursts of PV tachycardia being dependent on left atrial input and with the probability of persistent AF diminishing when PV tachycardias are eliminated by PV isolation.

Notes: Pulmonary Vein Electrograms. Introduction: Accurate discrimination of atrial and pulmonary vein potentials recorded circumferentially within the pulmonary veins is important when performing segmental isolation of the pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results: Twenty patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent pulmonary vein mapping with a decapolar Lasso catheter during sinus rhythm and during pacing in the distal coronary sinus and left atrial appendage. Bipolar and unipolar electrograms were recorded within the left superior, right superior, and left inferior pulmonary veins. The atrial potentials were larger in the left pulmonary veins than in the right superior pulmonary vein, whereas the pulmonary vein potentials in the superior pulmonary veins were larger than in the left inferior pulmonary vein. The atrial and pulmonary vein potentials usually were readily distinguished during sinus rhythm in the right superior pulmonary vein. Characteristic distribution and morphologies of the atrial potentials as well as the response to distal coronary sinus and left atrial appendage pacing were useful for differentiating the atrial and pulmonary vein potentials in the left pulmonary veins. Conclusion: Atrial and pulmonary vein potentials recorded circumferentially within the pulmonary veins have characteristic features that are useful in distinguishing them from each other.In the left pulmonary veins, discrimination of the atrial and pulmonary vein potentials is aided by coronary sinus or left atrial appendage pacing.

Notes: Isthmus Block During Atrial Flutter Ablation. Introduction: Complete bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block is the endpoint for ablation of typical atrial flutter. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the extent of prolongation of the transisthmus interval after ablation predicts complete bidirectional block. Methods and Results: Fifty-seven consecutive patients underwent 60 ablation procedures for isthmus-dependent atrial flutter. The clockwise and counterclockwise transisthmus intervals were determined before and after ablation during pacing from the low lateral right atrium and the coronary sinus. Bidirectional block was achieved with ablation in 55 (96%) of 57 patients. The transisthmus intervals before ablation and after complete transisthmus block were 100.3 ± 21.1 msec and 195.8 ± 30.1 msec, respectively, in the clockwise direction (P 〈 0.0001), and 98.2 ± 24.7 msec and 185.7 ± 33.9 msec, respectively, in the counterclockwise direction (P 〈 0.0001). An increase in the transisthmus interval by ≥ 50% in both directions after ablation predicted complete bidirectional block with 100% sensitivity and 80% specificity. The positive and negative predictive values were 89% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of ≥ 50% prolongation in the a transisthmus interval was 92%. Conclusion: Prolongation of the transisthmus interval by ≥ 50% in the clockwise and counte clockwise directions is associated with a high degree of diagnostic accuracy and an excellent negative predictive value in determining complete bidirectional transisthmus block. This may be a useful and simple adjunctive criterion for assessment of complete transisthmus conduction block.

Notes: Atrial Electrical Remodeling. Introduction: The incidence of atrial fibrillation is greater in men than in women, but the reasons for this gender difference are unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of gender on the atrial electrophysiologic effects of rapid atrial pacing and an increase in atrial pressure. Methods and Results: Right atrial pressure and effective refractory period (ERP) were measured during sinus rhythm and during atrial and simultaneous AV pacing at a cycle length of 300 msec in 10 premenopausal women, 11 postmenopausal women, and 24 men. The postmenopausal women were significantly older than the premenopausal women (61 ± 8 years vs 34 ± 10 years; P 〈 0.01). During sinus rhythm, mean atrial ERP in premenopausal women was shorter (211 ± 19 msec) than in postmenopausal women and age-matched men (242 ± 18 msec and 246 ± 34 msec, respectively; P 〈 0.05). Atrial ERPs in all patients shortened significantly during atrial and simultaneous AV pacing. However, the degree of shortening during atrial pacing (43 ± 8 msec vs 70 ± 20 msec and 74 ± 21 msec; P 〈 0.05) and during simultaneous AV pacing (48 ± 16 msec vs 91 ± 27 msec and 84 ± 26 msec; P 〈 0.05) was significantly less in premenopausal women than in postmenopausal women or age-matched men. Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate a significant gender difference in atrial electrophysiologic changes in response to rapid atrial pacing and an increase in atrial pressure. The effect of menopause on the observed changes suggests that the gender differences may be mediated by the effects of estrogen on atrial electrophysiologic properties.

Notes: Electrogram Polarity in Atrial Flutter Ablation. Introduction: The atrial activation sequence around the tricuspid annulus has been used to assess whether complete block has been achieved across the cavotricuspid isthmus during radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. However, sometimes the atrial activation sequence does not clearly establish the presence or absence of complete block. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a change in the polarity of atrial electrograms recorded near the ablation line is an accurate indicator of complete isthmus block. Methods and Results: Radiofrequency ablation was performed in 34 men and 10 women (age 60 ± 13 years [mean ± SD]) with isthmus-dependent, counterclockwise atrial flutter. Electrograms were recorded around the tricuspid annulus using a duodecapolar halo catheter. Electrograms recorded from two distal electrode pairs (E1 and E2) positioned just anterior to the ablation line were analyzed during atrial flutter and during coronary sinus pacing, before and after ablation. Complete isthmus block was verified by the presence of widely split double electrograms along the entire ablation line. Complete bidirectional isthmus block was achieved in 39 (89%) of 44 patients. Before ablation, the initial polarity of E1 and E2 was predominantly negative during atrial flutter and predominantly positive during coronary sinus pacing. During incomplete isthmus block, the electrogram polarity became reversed either only at E2, or at neither E1 nor E2. In every patient, the polarity of E1 and E2 became negative during coronary sinus pacing only after complete isthmus block was achieved. In 4 patients (10%), the atrial activation sequence recorded with the halo catheter was consistent with complete isthmus block, but the presence of incomplete block was accurately detected by inspection of the polarity of E1 and E2. Conclusion: Reversal of polarity in bipolar electrograms recorded just anterior to the line of isthmus block during coronary sinus pacing after ablation of atrial flutter is a simple, quick, and accurate indicator of complete isthmus block.

Notes: Defibrillation Energy Requirements. Introduction: Defibrillation energy requirements in patients with nonthoracotomy defibrillators may increase within several months after implantation. However, the stability of the defibrillation energy requirement beyond 1 year has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to characterize the defibrillation energy requirement during 2 years of clinical follow-up. Methods and Results: Thirty-one consecutive patients with a biphasic nonthoracotomy defibrillation system underwent defibrillation energy requirement testing using a step-down technique (20, 15, 12, 10, 8, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 J) during defibrillator implantation, and then 24 hours, 2 months, 1 year, and 2 years after implantation. The mean defibrillation energy requirement during these evaluations was 10.9 ± 5.5 J, 12.3 ± 7.3 J, 11.7 ± 5.6 J, 10.2 ± 4.0 J, and 11.7 ± 7.4 J, respectively (P= 0.4). The defibrillation energy requirement was noted to have increased by 10 J or more after 2 years of follow-up in five patients. In one of these patients, the defibrillation energy requirement was no longer associated with an adequate safety margin, necessitating revision of the defibrillation system. There were no identifiable clinical characteristics that distinguished patients who did and did not develop a 10-J or more increase in the defibrillation energy requirement. Conclusion: The mean defibrillation energy requirement does not change significantly after 2 years of biphasic nonthoracotomy defibrillator system implantation. However, approximately 15% of patients develop a 10-J or greater elevation in the defibrillation energy requirement, and 3% may require a defibrillation system revision. Therefore, a yearly evaluation of the defibrillation energy requirement may he appropriate.