Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Amsterdam : Elsevier
    Neuropsychologia 31 (1993), S. 251-259 
    ISSN: 0028-3932
    Source: Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002
    Topics: Psychology
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Amsterdam : Elsevier
    Neuropsychologia 28 (1990), S. 1251-1260 
    ISSN: 0028-3932
    Source: Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect 1907 - 2002
    Topics: Psychology
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 119 (1998), S. 92-102 
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Key words Monocular and binocular vision ; Interception ; Prehension ; Visuomotor behaviour ; Human
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  Previous work in our laboratory has demonstrated that binocular vision makes an important contribution to skilled reaching and grasping movements directed at static targets. In the present study we examine the contribution of binocular vision to interceptive reaching movements. We monitored such movements using a high-resolution, opto-electronic recording device (WATSMART), while subjects attempted to catch balls projected at them. No differences were found between monocular and binocular viewing conditions using this paradigm – either with respect to the velocity profiles or trajectories of the reaches. Moreover, the grasp was not affected by the type of vision available. It appears, then, that the moving targets provide adequate monocular depth and direction information (on the basis of optic flow) for the control of skilled interceptive movements directed at them. In addition, the time to achieve maximum grip aperture was constant across the trials – a finding consistent with the use of a time-to-contact variable derived from optic flow information. Finally, the transport component of prehension was found to be affected by certain variables that have, in the past, been thought to exclusively affect the grasp component of prehension, whereas the grasp component of prehension was affected by factors that have traditionally been thought to affect only the transport component.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 104 (1995), S. 107-114 
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Prehension ; Enucleation ; Monocular and binocular ; Visuomotor behaviour ; Human
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The aim of the present study was to determine whether normal subjects with one eye covered and patients in whom one eye had been enucleated generate more head movements than subjects using binocular vision during the performance of a visually guided grasping movement. In experiment 1, 14 right-handed normal subjects were tested binocularly and monocularly in a task in which they were required to reach out and grasp oblong blocks of different sizes at different distances. Although the typical binocular advantage in reaching and grasping was observed, the overall head movement scores did not differ between these testing conditions. In experiment 2, seven right-handed enucleated patients were compared to seven age and sex-matched control subjects (tested under binocular and monocular viewing conditions), on the same task as used in experiment 1. While no differences were found in the kinematics of reaches produced by the enucleated patients and the control subjects, the patients did produce larger and faster resultant head movements, composed mainly of lateral and vertical movements. This suggests that enucleated patients may be generating more head movements in order to better utilize retinal motion cues to aid in manual prehension.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Experimental brain research 130 (2000), S. 35-47 
    ISSN: 1432-1106
    Keywords: Key words Humans ; Prehension ; Monocular ; Binocular ; Limb movements ; Distance estimation ; Visual feedback ; Visuomotor behaviour
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract  Previous work has demonstrated that monocular vision affects the kinematics of skilled visually guided reaching movements in humans. In these experiments, prior to movement onset, subjects appeared to be underestimating the distance of objects (and as a consequence, their size) under monocular viewing relative to their reaches made under binocular control. The present series of experiments was conducted to assess whether this underestimation was a consequence of a purely visual distance underestimation under monocular viewing or whether it was due to some implicit inaccuracy in calibrating the reach by a visuomotor system normally under binocular control. In a purely perceptual task, a group of subjects made similar explicit distance estimations of the objects used in the prehension task under monocular and binocular viewing conditions, with no time constraints. A second group of subjects made these explicit distance estimations with only 500-ms views of the objects. No differences were found between monocular and binocular viewing in either of these explicit distance-estimation tasks. The limited-views subjects also performed a visually guided reaching task under monocular and binocular conditions and showed the previously demonstrated monocular underestimation (in that their monocular grasping movements showed lower peak velocities and smaller grip apertures). A distance underestimation of 4.1 cm in the monocular condition was computed by taking the y intercepts of the monocular and binocular peak velocity functions and dividing them by a common slope that minimised the sum of squares error. This distance underestimation was then used to predict the corresponding underestimation of size that should have been observed in the monocular reaches – a value closely approximating the observed value of 0.61 cm. Taken together, these results suggest that the monocular underestimation in the prehension task is not a consequence of a purely perceptual bias but rather it is visuomotor in nature – a monocular input to a system that normally calibrates motor output on the basis of binocular vision.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...