Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 12 (1984), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1600-0528
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The need for complete denture treatment was compared to utilization of complete denture services. To estimate the need for complete denture treatment we used data from the Mini-Finland Survey which included 3620 persons who were edentulous in one or both jaws. Data about utilization of services was obtained through questionnaires sent to samples of dentists and special dental technicians. Utilization of services was 21.8% of the need assessed with professional criteria and 17.7% of the subjective need. Compared to the subjectively assessed need, utilization of complete denture services was highest among young women and lowest among men aged 60–69 yr. Subjective need for denture services was highest in older groups. From these results we conclude that certain barriers prevent patients from seeking care; and as these barriers are reduced, use of complete denture services may increase.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 26 (1998), S. 0 
    ISSN: 1600-0528
    Source: Blackwell Publishing Journal Backfiles 1879-2005
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract– The aim of the study was to investigate the costs of orthodontic care provided for children and adolescents up to the age of 18 by municipal health centers in Finland, and to study the productivity of these services. The data were gathered by a questionnaire sent to all health centers; 96% responded. The majority of respondents estimated the share of orthodontic care as 10% of the total gross costs of dental care, given that 14% of all dental visits were for orthodontic reasons. To study the productivity in individual health centers, the output was measured by the estimated number of completely treated patients. The cost of orthodontic treatment per completely treated patient was, on average, FIM 7358, ranging from FIM 1299 to FIM 24 751. The strongest explanatory factor for the average total costs of orthodontic clinics was the number of general dentists with little experience in providing orthodontic treatment. Other explanatory factors were the number of orthodontists or experienced dentists, the percentage of orthodontic tasks performed by auxiliary personnel, and the timing of treatment. Savings might be obtained by devolving treatment to orthodontists or experienced dentists in-stead of to dentists with little orthodontic experience, and by starting treatment early. The estimated optimal size for an orthodontic clinic was found to be a unit with 830 completely treated patients per year, but most of the orthodontic clinics were in fact much smaller with, on average, 133 completely treated patients per year.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1573-7217
    Keywords: breast cancer screening ; cost‐effectiveness ; double reading ; mammography screening
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Background. Double reading is a widely used criterion standard in breast cancer screening despite a lack of evidence of the cost‐effectiveness of the second reading. This study evaluates the incremental cost‐effectiveness of such a strategy. Design. Cost‐effectiveness analysis: Nationwide population‐based semi‐annual screening program for women aged 50–59 in Finland. Participation rate was 91%. All mammograms (95,423) performed during 1990–1995 in three screening centers of the Finnish Cancer Society were read by two radiologists with gradings recorded. The effectiveness of the double reading was the difference in cancers detected in the double compared to that of the single reading. Incremental costs of the double reading for the health care and non‐health care and the time costs were estimated. The main outcome measure was the incremental cost per additional cancer found as a result of the double‐reading strategy. Results. The total number of cancers detected with the double and single reading were 290 and 261, respectively. A significantly higher ratio of carcinoma in situ was the causative pathology in cancers detected only by the second reader. The cost per cancer detected with a single reading was US$ 18,340. The incremental cost of any additional cancer found was US$ 25,523, that is, a 39% higher cost per additional cancer found by double reading. Conclusions. The additional cost per cancer detected by double reading is not drastically higher than with single reading. However, the additional cost per life year saved may be much higher.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...