Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-0517
    Keywords: Key words GMO detection ; PCR ; Food labelling ; Quality assurance
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract  The detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a complex multiparameter problem. Therefore, a number of critical issues in respect to quality control need to be considered. For practical purposes, the PCR process itself can be divided into three subprocesses: template isolation and reaction setup (pre-PCR), PCR reaction and detection of amplification products, and data evaluation (post-PCR). Crucial factors for the pre-PCR process are the following: homogeneity of the sample to be analysed, performance of template isolation and purification in terms of yield and purity, standardized process for the estimation of concentrations of genomic DNA and all reagents used in the reaction. For the PCR itself, crucial factors to be controlled are: setup of reactions, batch to batch variations of reagents, temperature-time programs used for the PCR amplification, and the performance of different types of hardware (e.g. different brands of thermocyclers). The crucial factor for the post-PCR process is the detection of the amplification products of the PCR. The tremendous sensitivity of PCR methods requires a careful and consequent separation of the three processes in terms of hardware, laboratory space and sample handling. The avoidance of contamination is one of the most critical factors. The goal of quality assurance measures must be to ensure appropriate results at maximum sensitivity. The complexity of any PCR system used for the detection of GMOs leads to the requirement of a careful validation process for any laboratory using such methods. For qualitative analyses crucial validation parameters are: specificity, selectivity, repeatability, intermediate precision, reproducibility, limit of detection and robustness.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Zeitschrift für Lebensmittel-Untersuchung und -Forschung 206 (1998), S. 399-403 
    ISSN: 1431-4630
    Keywords: Key words Coeliac disease ; ELISA ; PCR ; Wheat prolamins ; Oats
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Process Engineering, Biotechnology, Nutrition Technology
    Notes: Abstract  It is well established that the consumption of wheat prolamins causes the characteristic symptoms of coeliac disease (CD) in subjects who are predisposed to it. There is currently much discussion about the role of oats in the pathogenesis of CD. Evidently, it is important that oats used for clinical studies are not contaminated with wheat. In this study, 38 oat samples were investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): 30 samples consisted of flakes or grains and 8 probes were industrially processed oat diets. Wheat prolamin (gliadin) detection by ELISA showed that 16 of these samples contained less than the detection limit of 0.2 mg gliadin/100 g dry weight; 21 samples contained less than 2.8 mg gliadin/100 g dry weight and 1 sample reached 38 mg gliadin/100 g dry weight, clearly exceeding the allowed Swiss limit of 10 mg gliadin/100 g dry weight for gluten-free products. Spiking experiments showed that the wheat PCR system is about ten times more sensitive than the ELISA system, provided that the isolated DNA is fully amplifiable. Thus, wheat DNA could be detected by the wheat PCR system in ten samples with gliadin contents below the detection limit of the ELISA system used. Applying a eukaryote-specific 18S-PCR system the presence of amplifiable DNA was verified. Only two of eight samples of industrially processed oat products contained amplifiable DNA, the other six samples had no detectable DNA left. One sample was wheat-PCR positive. However, all eight samples contained detectable amounts of gliadin in the ELISA.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...