ISSN:
1436-5073
Keywords:
analytical chemistry
;
good laboratory practice (GLP)
;
good analytical practice (GAP)
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Chemistry and Pharmacology
Notes:
Abstract According to the chemical legislation in force in most of the industrialized nations to protect man and the environment from the harmful effects of hazardous substances and preparations, a product must be subjected to a large number of mandatory tests before it may be marketed, to demonstrate that it shows no adverse effects on man or the environment when properly handled. To ensure that the results of tests are comparable and above all verifiable, the OECD has drawn up a set of guidelines for Good Laboratory Practice, GLP, on the request of the FDA and EPA authorities in the USA. The application of these guidelines is now mandatory for all the tests specified by the chemical legislation, also for analytical methods. These methods not only apply to the stipulated determination of physical and chemical parameters they also apply to toxicological and ecotoxicological tests. Comprehensive documentation of all stages of these tests from preparatory work to reporting is designed to make the results verifiable. Agreement with the principles of GLP means that the procedures used in a test have been documented in such a manner as to be verifiable. However, does compliance with GLP necessarily guarantee accurate analytical values and thus correct test results? Is GLP necessarily also Good Analytical Practice, GAP? In the following the authors try to provide the answer.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01245195
Permalink
