Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of clinical pharmacology 39 (1990), S. 457-461 
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: Vancomycin ; drug utilization ; drug usage evaluation
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary A prospective, two-phase, drug utilization review (DUR) was performed at the Royal Adelaide Hospital (RAH) to determine the extent and pattern of vancomycin use. For all patients commencing oral or parenteral vancomycin, treatment indication, route of administration, duration of therapy, results of culture and sensitivity tests, adverse drug reactions and results of therapeutic drug level monitoring were recorded. Vancomycin courses were classified as being for therapy or prophylaxis and compared with predetermined audit criteria to assess appropriateness of use. During the 8 week initial phase, data on 62 treatment courses in 59 patients were recorded, 50% for therapy and 50% for prophylaxis. Sixty four percent were classified as inappropriate, occurring in 32% of therapeutic courses and 97% of those for prophylaxis. During the 10 week re-evaluation, conducted 10 months later, data for 43 treatment courses in 43 patients were reviewed, 42% for therapy and 58% for prophylaxis. Sixty five percent were inappropriate occuring in 17% of therapeutic courses and 100% of the prophylactic courses. When compared with the initial phase, the re-evaluation demonstrated a decrease in the empirical use of vancomycin in the combination treatment of neutropaenic fever and also in the duration of vancomycin use for surgical prophylaxis. During both study phases, criteria contraventions were mostly due to inappropriate indication or duration of therapy. The cost of inappropriate vancomycin use was reduced by over 50% between survey phases, from $Aus11,500 or 55% of total vancomycin cost during the initial phase to $Aus3,600 or 25.7% during the re-evaluation. The most effective of the remedial strategies implemented after the initial phase was direct consultation with prescriber groups. The effectiveness of this DUR has provided the basis for an ongoing DUR programme at the RAH which has been met with general acceptance by hospital clinicians and administrators.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: Lisinopril ; Hydrochlorothiazide ; hypertension ; electrolyte balance
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary The effects of lisinopril 10–20 mg or hydrochlorothiazide 25–50 mg (each given once daily) on blood pressure, serum sodium, potassium and magnesium concentrations, total body potassium and urinary cation excretion were compared in a group of hypertensive patients using a double blind randomised crossover design. Each active treatment phase lasted six weeks and a total of sixteen patients completed the study. Both lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide produced clinically significant decreases in blood pressure. However, lisinopril treatment produced a mean reduction of 14 mm Hg in sitting diastolic pressure compared with a 7 mm Hg reduction for hydrochlorothiazide treatment. This difference was statistically significant. The decrease in the concentration of serum potassium during hydrochlorothiazide treatment was greater than that during lisinopril treatment (0.53 vs 0.01 mmol·l−1). The absolute value of serum potassium was significantly lower on hydrochlorothiazide than on lisinopril therapy. Neither treatment had an effect on serum magnesium concentrations, nor was there any significant effect of either treatment on urine volume or urinary excretion of sodium, potassium or magnesium. There was a trend towards increased total body potassium concentration on lisinopril compared with a decrease in total body potassium on hydrochlorothiazide. However, this difference was just outside the range of statistical significance. Both treatments were equally well tolerated. The results indicate slight superiority of lisinopril over hydrochlorothiazide with regard to control of diastolic blood pressure with a better effect on overall electrolyte balance.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...