Library

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Hygienemaßnahmen ; Infektion ; nosokomial ; Key words Hygiene ; Infections ; Nosocomial
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract The objective of this review is to describe which hygiene measures are appropriate and necessary in anaesthesia and the ICU and which are not, whereby unnecessary hygiene measures are those which are not substantiated by scientific data. The most effective single infection control measure is still hand disinfection between patient contacts. Unnessecary measures include routine sampling of environmental surfaces, disinfecting the floor in the ICU, protective gowns for visitors, so called in-line filters in the infusion system etc. Ventilator tubes only need to be exchanged once a week, even when no HMEs are used.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung Ziel dieser Übersicht ist es, die wichtigsten sinnvollen bzw. notwendigen und nicht sinnvollen Hygienemaßnahmen in der Anästhesie und auf Intensivstationen zu beschreiben, wobei nicht sinnvolle Hygienemaßnahmen dadurch definiert sind, daß es für deren Notwendigkeit keine wissenschaftlichen Daten gibt. Die wirkungsvollste krankenhaushygienische Einzelmaßnahme ist nach wie vor die Händedesinfektion. Zu den unnötigen Hygienemaßnahmen gehören ungezielte Umgebungsuntersuchungen, Fußbodendesinfektion auf Intensivstationen, Schutzkittel für Besucher, sog. in-line-Filter im Infusionssystem usw. Das Wechselintervall für Beatmungsschläuche kann auf 7 Tage ausgedehnt werden, auch wenn keine HMEs verwendet werden.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Nosokomiale Infektionen ; Intensivstationen ; NIDEP ; Bundesweite Prävalenzstudie ; Key words Nosocomial infections ; Intensive care unit ; NIDEP ; Nationwide prevalence survey
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract In a large, multicenter survey in 1994, the prevalence of nosocomial infections in German hospitals was examined, predominant pathogens were identified, and possible risk factors evaluated. In this paper the results from the intensive care units (ICUs) are presented. Methods. Seventy-two representative hospitals in Germany were selected by randomisation and divided into four different groups according to their size (〈200 beds; 200–400 beds; 400–600 beds; 〉600 beds). During 10 months four especially trained doctors documented the patients clinical and laboratory data and possible endogenous and exogenous risk factors for nosocomial infections. For better evaluation, they discussed the cases with the responsible senior officers and health care workers and visited the patients. Diagnosis of nosocomial infection was based on CDC criteria. Results. In 515 patients in 89 ICUs, 78 hospital-acquired infections were documented (15.3%). The most common were pneumonia (5.9%), bronchitis (2.7%), urinary tract infections (2.4%), and septicaemia (2.2%). Possible exogenous risk factors included: peripheral venous catheters (65.6%); catheterisation of the urinary tract (64.5%); central venous catheters (60.4%); gastric tubes (38.0%); wound drainage (28.6%) and artificial ventilation (27.6%). The most frequent concomitant diseases were cardiovascular (61.9%), diabetes (20.2%), malignancies (18.8%), pre-existing infections (15.3%), and chronic respiratory disease (14.0%). The prevalence of nosocomial infections was higher in hospitals with more than 600 beds than in smaller ones (28.3% versus 12.9%, P〈0.001). Predominant pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enterococci, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida spp., Escherichia coli, and Klebsiella spp.. Fifty per cent of the ICUs changed ventilation tubes and 66.3% changed infusion sets daily; 34.8% of patients received drugs for the prevention of stress ulcers that neutralise or decrease production of gastric acid; only 7.6% received sucralfate. Routine microbiological surveillance of tracheal aspirates and urine was done by 25.9% and 24.6% of the ICUs, respectively. Discussion. Nosocomial infections are seen far more often in ICUs than on normal wards due to the immunosuppressed state of many ICU patients and the continuous use of invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Most of these infections are of endogenous origin. Other prevalence surveys have shown results comparable to ours. Daily changing of ventilation tubes is no longer necessary, but is still routine in many hospitals. Infusion sets were also changed more often than required. The use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract for the prevention of pneumonia is still controversial; in our study it was practised in only 1.5% of the cases. The most commonly used drugs for the prevention of stress ulcers were H2-receptor blocking agents, although it has been shown that sucralfate is the better choice, as it can help prevent nosocomial pneumonia. Routine microbiological surveillance of tracheal aspirates and urine was done in 25.9% and 24.6% of the ICUs. No study so far has shown that routine cultures of tracheal secretions and urine have a preventive effect regarding infection.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung Im Auftrag des Bundesgesundheitsministeriums wurde von Januar bis Oktober 1994 eine für Deutschland repräsentative Prävalenzstudie mit insgesamt 14966 Patienten an 72 nach Größenklassen ausgewählten Kliniken mit dem Ziel durchgeführt, nosokomiale Infektionen, potentielle Risikofaktoren und Hygienemaßnahmen zu erfassen (NIDEP: Nosokomiale Infektionen in Deutschland – Erfassung und Prävention). Auf 89 Intensivstationen hatten von 515 Patienten 78 (15,3%) mindestens eine nosokomiale Infektion. Die häufigsten Infektionen waren Pneumonie (5,9%), Tracheobronchitis (2,7%), Harnwegsinfektion (2,4%) und primäre Sepsis (2,2%). Die häufigsten potentiellen endogenen Risikofaktoren für Krankenhausinfektionen waren Herz-Kreislauferkrankungen (61,9%), Diabetes mellitus (20,2%), Malignome (18,8%), vorbestehende Infektionen (15,3%) und chronische Atemwegserkrankungen (14,0%). Für die potentiell exogenen Risikofaktoren ergaben sich folgende Prävalenzen: Periphere Venenkatheter (65,6%), Harndrainagen (64,5%), zentrale Venenkatheter (60,4%), Magensonden (38,0%), Wunddrainagen (28,6%), und kontrollierte Beatmung (27,6%). 50,0% der Intensivstationen wechselten die Beatmungsschläuche und 66,3% die Infusionssysteme immer noch täglich. Bei 34,8% der Patienten wurde eine säurehemmende Streßulkusprophylaxe durchgeführt, lediglich 17,6% der Patienten erhielten Sucralfat. Die Mehrzahl der Intensivstationen führte kein routinemäßiges mikrobiologisches Monitoring durch. Einige Intensivstationen untersuchten jedoch Urin und Trachealsekret täglich. Die häufigsten Erreger nosokomialer Infektionen auf Intensivstationen waren in absteigender Reihenfolge Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterokokken, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida spp., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1432-055X
    Keywords: Schlüsselwörter Intensivmedizin ; Surveillance ; Infektionsraten ; Prävention ; Qualitätsmanagement ; Keywords Intensive care ; Surveillance ; Prevention ; Quality management ; Infection rates
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Abstract Objectives. To establish a surveillance system as an element of internal quality management, participating intensive care units (ICUs) report their ICU-associated infection surveillance data for aggregation into a national database. Methods. In order to provide data on ICU-associated infections, a nosocomial surveillance system in German intensive care units (Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System (KISS)) started in 1997. The method of data collection is based on the (adult) ICU surveillance component from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS)-System. Until now 113 German ICUs (most of them medical/surgical ICUs) were included in this system. We continuously collected and calculated the data from site-specific infections (device-associated pneumonias, blood stream infections and urinary tract infections). Results. There are now a total of 393.177 patient-days (100.015 patients) among them 176.415 ventilator-days, 295.221 central line-days and 316.799 urinary catheter-days in the data base. The data analysis showed the following device-associated infection rates: 11.2 pneumonias/1000 ventilator-days, 1.8 primary bloodstream infections/ 1000 central line-days and 4.0 urinary tract infections/1000 urinary catheter-days. Conclusion. The project has reached high interest in Germany and animated more ICUs to take part or to apply the same method in order to use the reference data for comparison.
    Notes: Zusammenfassung Die fortlaufende, systematische Erfassung, Analyse und Interpretation (=Surveillance) nosokomialer Infektionsraten spielt die wesentliche Rolle bei der Problemidentifikation und der nachfolgenden Problemlösung im Rahmen der Infektionsprävention. Ziel des Nationalen Referenzzentrums für Krankenhaushygiene und des Robert Koch-Instituts war die Etablierung einer einheitlichen Surveillance-Methode auf mehreren Intensivstationen und die Bereitstellung der gewonnenen Daten als nationale Referenzdaten. Seit Januar 1997 wird für Deutschland eine Referenzdatenbank zur Surveillance nosokomialer Infektionen auf Intensivstationen aufgebaut. Auf 113 Intensivstationen wurden bisher die Daten von 100.015 Patienten (393.177 Patiententage) erfasst. Als Methode der Standardisierung wird die Anzahl der Infektionen, die während der Anwendung eines Risikofaktors auftreten (Harnwegskatheter, ZVK oder maschinelle Beatmung) auf die Anwendungshäufigkeit des Risikofaktors bezogen (“device”-assoziierte Infektionsrate). Folgende “device”-assoziierten Infektionsraten wurden ermittelt: 4, 0 Harnwegsinfektionen/1.000 Harnwegskathetertage, 1, 8 primäre Septikämien/1000 ZVK-Tage und 11, 2 Pneumonien/1.000 Beatmungstage (Mittelwerte). Durch den Vergleich der eigenen Daten mit denen der Referenzdatenbank haben Intensivstationen Gelegenheit, Anhaltspunkte für eine Optimierung von Präventionsmaßnahmen zu erhalten.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1432-1440
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of molecular medicine 57 (1979), S. 1203-1208 
    ISSN: 1432-1440
    Keywords: Hospital-acquired infections ; Prevention ; Control Priorities ; Krankenhausinfektionen ; Verhütung ; Bekämpfung ; Prioritäten
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung Die Häufigkeit krankenhauserworbener Infektionen schwankt zwischen 2 und 15%; durchschnittlich liegt die Rate zwischen 5 und 8%. Häufigste Infektionen sind Harnweginfektionen, Wundinfektionen, Atemweginfektionen, Sepsis und Infektionen der Haut und Subkutis. Krankenhausinfektionen entstehen insbesondere auf zwei Wegen, exogen durch Keime aus der Umwelt des Patienten bzw. endogen aus der körpereigenen Flora. Der wichtigste Übertragungsweg von Erregern krankenhauserworbener Infektionen sind die Hände. Die Luft als Überträger von Erregern krankenhauserworbener Infektionen spielt eine vergleichsweise untergeordnete Rolle. Wichtigste Bekämpfungsmaßnahmen sind: Händewaschen und Händedesinfektion, Verbesserung bestimmter pflegerischer Techniken, Isolierung infizierter und besonders infektionsanfälliger Patienten, Einsatz speziell geschulten Personals (Hygienefachschwestern/pfleger) zur Erfassung und Überwachung von Krankenhausinfektionen, Überwachung von Antibiotikatherapie, insbesondere Antibiotikaprophylaxe. Routinemäßige, ungezielte Fußbodendesinfektion hat keinen Einfluß auf die Krankenhausinfektionsrate.
    Notes: Summary The incidence of hospital-acquired infections varies between 2 and 15% (on average 5 to 8%). Most common nosocomial infections are urinary tract infections, wound infections, respiratory tract infections, septicemia and infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Nosocomial infections arise essentially via two routes: endogenously from the bodies own flora or exogenously via direct or indirect contact with the patient. Bacteria are most commonly transmitted from patient to patient by hands. Air as a vehicle, by which bacteria are transmitted, plays a relatively minor role. Priorities in hospital infection control are: hand washing and hand desinfection, improvement of certain nursing techniques, isolation of infected or susceptible patients, an infection control team with a nurse epidemiologist, surveillance and control of antibiotic therapy regimens, especially of antibiotic prophylaxis. Routine floor desinfection could not be shown to significantly reduce the hospital infection rate.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of molecular medicine 57 (1979), S. 147-148 
    ISSN: 1432-1440
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Intensive care medicine 22 (1996), S. 1155-1161 
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Nosocomial pneumonia ; scoring system ; Risk factors ; Intensive care units
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective To develop a scoring system for stratifying patients in intensive care units (ICUs) by risk of developing nosocomial pneumonia (NP), based on variables generally available in an ICU, and to determine the probability of a patient developing NP in the ICU. Design and setting A 2-year prospective cohort study conducted in a medical and surgical ICU. Patients 756 patients admitted to the ICU for 48 h or more were followed up until the development of NP or death or discharge from the ICU. Measurements and results 129 (17.1%) patients developed NP, 106 (14%) in the first 2 weeks. The following independent risk factors were identified by multivariate analysis: no infection on admission [relative risk (RR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI)=2.0 to 4.8]; thorax drainage (RR=2.1, 95% CI=1.2 to 3.5); administration of antacids (RR=2.1, 95% CI=1.4 to 3.1); partial pressure of oxygen (PO2)〉110 mmHg (RR=1.6, 95% CI=1.0 to 2.6); administration of coagulation factors (RR=1.8, 95% CI=1.0 to 3.2); male gender (RR=2.7, 95% CI=1.2 to 6.3); urgent surgery (RR=2.4, 95% CI=0.9 to 6.4); and neurological diseases (RR=4.2, 95% CI=1.9 to 9.4). To obtain a predictive risk index for NP, a scoring system was developed using a multivariate model. The probability of developing NP varied between 11.0% in the lowest risk group and 42.3% in the highest risk group. The patients' risk of acquiring NP was seven times higher in the highest score category (IV) than in the lowest one (I). Conclusions ICU patients can be stratified into high- and low-risk groups for NP. No infection on admission, thorax drainage, administration of antacids, and PO2〉110 mmHg were associated with a higher risk of NP during the entire 2-week period.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Intensive care medicine 22 (1996), S. 1155-1161 
    ISSN: 1432-1238
    Keywords: Key words Nosocomial pneumonia ; Scoring system ; Risk factors ; Intensive care units
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective: To develop a scoring system for stratifying patients in intensive care units (ICUs) by risk of developing nosocomial pneumonia (NP), based on variables generally available in an ICU, and to determine the probability of a patient developing NP in the ICU. Design and setting: A 2-year prospective cohort study conducted in a medical and surgical ICU. Patients: 756 patients admitted to the ICU for 48 h or more were followed up until the development of NP or death or discharge from the ICU. Measurements and results: 129 (17.1%) patients developed NP, 106 (14%) in the first 2 weeks. The following independent risk factors were identified by multivariate analysis: no infection on admission [relative risk (RR)=3.1, 95% confidence intervals (CI)=2.0 to 4.8]; thorax drainage (RR=2.1, 95% CI=1.2 to 3.5); administration of antacids (RR=2.1, 95% CI=1.4 to 3.1); partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) 〉110 mmHg (RR=1.6, 95% CI=1.0 to 2.6); administration of coagulation factors (RR=1.8, 95% CI=1.0 to 3.2); male gender (RR=2.7, 95% CI=1.2 to 6.3); urgent surgery (RR=2.4, 95% CI=0.9 to 6.4); and neurological diseases (RR=4.2, 95% CI=1.9 to 9.4). To obtain a predictive risk index for NP, a scoring system was developed using a multivariate model. The probability of developing NP varied between 11.0% in the lowest risk group and 42.3% in the highest risk group. The patients‘ risk of acquiring NP was seven times higher in the highest score category (IV) than in the lowest one (I). Conclusions: ICU patients can be stratified into high- and low-risk groups for NP. No infection on admission, thorax drainage, administration of antacids, and PO2〉110 mmHg were associated with a higher risk of NP during the entire 2-week period.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of pediatrics 110 (1971), S. 248-260 
    ISSN: 1432-1076
    Keywords: Leukodystrophia ; Orthochromatic ; Pelizaeus-Merzbacher Disease ; Classical Type ; Clinical Diagnosis
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Description / Table of Contents: Zusammenfassung In den meisten Fallbeschreibungen stützt sich die Diagnose der PMK vorwiegend auf den pathologisch-anatomischen Befund. Am Beispiel einer weiteren Familie mit PMK, die ausschließlich auf Grund des genetischen, klinischen und hirnbioptischen Befundes diagnostiziert wurde, wird dargelegt, daß das klassische klinisch und genetisch definierte Krankheitssyndrom für die Diagnose ein zuverlässigeres Kriterium bildet als der variationsreiche pathologische Befund.
    Notes: Abstract In most case-reports the diagnosis of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease is only made on morphological grounds without taking into consideration that the clinical and genetical findings of these cases were often incomplete. With the report of a new family with PM.-disease, where the diagnosis was made exclusively on the basis of clinical and genetical findings as well as brain biopsies, we want to point out, that the classical clinically and genetically defined syndrome is a more reliable criterium for making a diagnosis than the rather variable pathological findings.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Acta neurochirurgica 86 (1987), S. 79-82 
    ISSN: 0942-0940
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Medicine
    Notes: Summary How the method of shaving affects the incidence of deep postoperative wound infections was examined in 475 patients. It is shown that the rate of infection is not lower after wet shaving than after dry shaving. The overall infection rate was 4.2%, 2.9% in patients who had been shaved wet versus 5.5% in patients shaved dry. The difference is, however, not significant on the 5% level. With respect to dry shaving, the infection rate was not affected by whether the hair was removed with electric clippers alone (2.8%) or whether a disposable razor was also used for additional hair removal in the area of skin incision (3.2%).
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Library Location Call Number Volume/Issue/Year Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...